Review of road tunnel risk assessment - common aspects?
- Safety measures like tunnel emergency Ventilation Systems cause high financial costs. Hence, safety measures have to be chosen with the focus on the expected reduction of the consequences like fatalities or damage on structures and in conjunction with the investments. Since 2004, the European directive EU 2004/54/EC proposes therefore the application of risk assessments. Because the EU directive provides only few legal requirements on risk assessments, the methodologies developed on this basis have large differences. After one decade of intensive research, the comparative study now highlights common aspects and differences of several methodologies.
Autor*innen: | Florian Berchtold, Sebastian ThönsORCiD, Christian Knaust, Andreas Rogge |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband |
Veröffentlichungsform: | Graue Literatur |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes (Englisch): | 6th International symposium on tunnel safety and security |
Jahr der Erstveröffentlichung: | 2014 |
Erste Seite: | 669 |
Letzte Seite: | 670 |
Freie Schlagwörter: | Comparative study; Fire; Risk assessment; Safety; System; Tunnel |
Veranstaltung: | 6th International symposium on tunnel safety and security |
Veranstaltungsort: | Marseille, France |
Beginndatum der Veranstaltung: | 12.03.2014 |
Enddatum der Veranstaltung: | 14.03.2014 |
Verfügbarkeit des Dokuments: | Datei im Netzwerk der BAM verfügbar ("Closed Access") |
Datum der Freischaltung: | 20.02.2016 |
Referierte Publikation: | Nein |