Refine
Language
Document Type
- Articles (147)
- Dissertations (28)
- Reviews (17)
- Books (16)
- Collections (2)
- Forewords (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (211) (remove)
Year of publication
- 2009 (211) (remove)
美籍华人作家白先勇与意识流大师乔伊斯都是具有世界影响的文学奇才,在他们所创作的众多作品中,白先勇的《台北人》和乔伊斯的《都柏林人》表现出了极大的相似性,两部作品都以作家所生活过的一个城市为背景,生动地描绘了各自所处的时代与环境下特定城市群体的人生百态,光怪陆离的城市生活,形形色色的城市人物,以及每个人都难以忘怀且诉说不尽的城市记忆,进而表现了博大的人生与历史主题。两位作家站在历史的、哲学的、社会的高度,以敏锐的洞察力深刻地剖析了时代的、民族的精神状态与具有现代色彩的城市人物情感,尤其是《台北人》和《都柏林人》在描写这些城市群体以及他们复杂的人生与命运时俱都透视与观照了这些特殊的文化类群所特有的一种孤独感,揭示了形成他们这种孤独的历史的现实的精神根源。本文拟采用平行研究的方法,对白先勇和乔伊斯的孤独意识进行深度比较,从他们各自所表现的孤独的形态、孤独的变异和形成孤独的根源展开系列研究,揭示两位作家在社会转型过程中所持有的一种非理性视角以及他们笔下的人物在荒诞的现实和无情的时间中的无助感和异化感,从而反思传统、拷问当下、展望未来,以人道主义情怀关注>人<的感受、观照>人<的生存、体验>人<的孤独。本论一方面依托《台北人》和《都柏林人》两个文本对白先勇和乔伊斯的孤独意识进行了具体的观察与比较,同时也从社会学与文化学角度审视了中西文化的差异性,进而在人类学的层面以美国学者弗洛姆>爱的理论<讨论实现>孤独的救赎<,尽管白先勇与乔伊斯在《台北人》和《都柏林人》中没有给孤独的救赎指出一条明路,但他们在作品中都体现出了>爱<,白先勇对>台北人<是尊重的、理解的、关心的,他以人道主义和悲悯情怀爱着笔下那群在历史和命运中苦苦挣扎的>台北人<,同样,乔伊斯也深爱着爱尔兰,深爱着都柏林,并通过>都柏林人<最后的>精神顿悟<,唤起民族意识的苏醒并激起民族性情的释放。>青春短暂,艺术永恒<的创作理念使得两位作家在>民族<、>人性<和>文化<的层面在对孤独感进行展示时获得了艺术生命的永恒。
This book seeks to make a presentation of eclectic concepts and explanation of a theory of psychopathology. Initially the first question arises: What is normal or abnormal for a particular culture? This is always present when we describe the concept of psychopathology. This understanding comes at a very auspicious time, the intention is to help the future psychoanalyst to understand and understand on the basis of this explanation, on the psychopathological aspects of the human mind. My intention is to enable the professional future of health care, a comprehensive and transdisciplinary as a subsidy to better formulate your diagnosis.
This approach focuses on a multidimensional view, this means that the reader can make their own deductions and conclusions from reading this writing. This is a textbook for professionals who are in psychoanalytic training or other related fields who wish to understand the pathological anomalies and misfits of the human mind. I believe that this reflection on several theoretical provides a vision of the whole and not just a single theory. There is, anyway, no desire to defend hypotheses with theoretical variables that may be a particular paradigm or a school of thought psychobiological or genetics. My intention is to get the reader to formulate their own point of view, in relation to the formulation of a diagnosis, with children, adolescents, adults or seniors.