Nano
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (347)
- Vortrag (336)
- Posterpräsentation (99)
- Forschungsdatensatz (50)
- Sonstiges (20)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (16)
- Buchkapitel (10)
- Beitrag zu einem Sammelband (10)
- Forschungsbericht (9)
- Zeitschriftenheft (Herausgeberschaft für das komplette Heft) (6)
- Video (5)
- Sammelband (Herausgeberschaft für den kompletten Band) (4)
- Handbuch (4)
- Preprint (3)
- Monografie (1)
- Dissertation (1)
- Newsletter (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (867)
- Deutsch (52)
- Spanisch (2)
- Mehrsprachig (1)
Schlagworte
- Nanoparticles (124)
- Nano (70)
- SAXS (64)
- XPS (60)
- Laser-induced periodic surface structures (LIPSS) (59)
- Fluorescence (53)
- Quantum yield (51)
- Electron microscopy (48)
- Nanoparticle (46)
- X-ray scattering (45)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 6 Materialchemie (656)
- 6.1 Oberflächen- und Dünnschichtanalyse (344)
- 1 Analytische Chemie; Referenzmaterialien (184)
- 1.2 Biophotonik (159)
- 6.6 Physik und chemische Analytik der Polymere (134)
- 6.5 Synthese und Streuverfahren nanostrukturierter Materialien (127)
- 6.2 Material- und Oberflächentechnologien (90)
- 5 Werkstofftechnik (61)
- 4 Material und Umwelt (46)
- 5.4 Multimateriale Fertigungsprozesse (33)
- 6.3 Strukturanalytik (27)
- 7 Bauwerkssicherheit (27)
- 4.2 Material-Mikrobiom Wechselwirkungen (26)
- 9 Komponentensicherheit (25)
- 9.5 Tribologie und Verschleißschutz (20)
- 4.1 Biologische Materialschädigung und Referenzorganismen (19)
- 7.5 Technische Eigenschaften von Polymerwerkstoffen (17)
- 1.5 Proteinanalytik (14)
- 6.7 Materialsynthese und Design (14)
- 8 Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (14)
- 5.1 Mikrostruktur Design und Degradation (13)
- 5.6 Glas (10)
- 8.5 Röntgenbildgebung (9)
- VP Vizepräsident (9)
- VP.1 eScience (9)
- 1.9 Chemische und optische Sensorik (8)
- 6.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (7)
- 1.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (5)
- 7.6 Korrosion und Korrosionsschutz (5)
- 1.1 Anorganische Spurenanalytik (4)
- 7.4 Baustofftechnologie (4)
- 1.8 Umweltanalytik (3)
- P Präsident (3)
- 1.7 Organische Spuren- und Lebensmittelanalytik (2)
- 3 Gefahrgutumschließungen; Energiespeicher (2)
- 5.2 Metallische Hochtemperaturwerkstoffe (2)
- 5.5 Materialmodellierung (2)
- 8.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (2)
- 9.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (2)
- 9.4 Integrität von Schweißverbindungen (2)
- P.0 Präsident und andere (2)
- 1.3 Instrumentelle Analytik (1)
- 1.4 Prozessanalytik (1)
- 2 Prozess- und Anlagensicherheit (1)
- 2.1 Sicherheit von Energieträgern (1)
- 3.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (1)
- 3.5 Sicherheit von Gasspeichern (1)
- 4.5 Kunst- und Kulturgutanalyse (1)
- 5.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (1)
- 5.3 Polymere Verbundwerkstoffe (1)
- 6.4 Materialinformatik (1)
- 7.1 Baustoffe (1)
- 7.2 Ingenieurbau (1)
- 8.1 Sensorik, mess- und prüftechnische Verfahren (1)
- 8.4 Akustische und elektromagnetische Verfahren (1)
- 8.6 Faseroptische Sensorik (1)
- 9.2 Versuchsanlagen und Prüftechnik (1)
- 9.3 Schweißtechnische Fertigungsverfahren (1)
- MP Mitglied des Präsidiums (1)
- MP.0 Mitglied des Präsidiums und andere (1)
- PST Präsidiale Stabsstelle (1)
Paper des Monats
- ja (15)
Standardised methods need validation. The main validation parameters like trueness, repeatability and intermediate precision and reproducibility are presented. Furthermore, different methods for the validation are disussed: (certified) reference materials, representative testing materials and interlaboratory comparisons. At last, the need of proficiency testing is stressed.
Revealing surface functionalities of micro- and nanoplastic particles’ surface by means of XPS
(2024)
Over the last 20 years, many researchers, politicians, and citizens themselves have become increasingly aware of the growing plastic problem of our time. Inadequate recycling concepts, collection points, and careless dumping of plastic products in the environment lead to an accumulation of plastic. External weather influences can cause these to degrade and fractionate, so that today microplastics (1-1000 µm, ISO/TR 21960:2020) [1] of different polymer materials can be detected in all parts of the world.
The precautionary principle applies to microplastics. The particles can break down further to form nanoplastics (<1 µm, ISO/TR 21960:2020) [1]. Whether microplastics or nanoplastics pose a toxicological hazard is being investigated in a variety of ways. Valid results are still pending, however, investigations into the frequency, transport, possible sinks and entry paths must be taken into account. This is why monitoring of microplastics is already required in the revision of the Drinking Water Framework Directive [2]. The same is still pending in the final version of the revision of the Waste Water Framework Directive this year, but is expected.
Nanoplastics are particularly under discussion for having a toxic effect on humans and animals, as these particles are small enough to be absorbed by cells. For targeted toxicological studies, it is important to have test and reference materials that resemble the particles found in the environment. To mimic environmental samples, these materials should also have an irregular shape and show aging at the surface, which can be detected with XPS or SEM/EDS.
BAM in collaboration with the EMPIR project "PlasticTrace" works on a reference material candidate of nano-sized polypropylene (nano-PP) [3]. The nano-PP vials were tested for homogeneity with PTA and further characterized with bulk and surface-sensitive techniques. An SEM image and a corresponding XPS spectrum are presented in Figure 1. Raman measurements as well as XPS indicate an aged surface.
Small-area XPS analysis is one of the most popular and powerful methods for analysing the surface of features in the micro-range. When measuring microstructures, the ques-tion arises whether the measuring point is really located at the point intended to be ana-lysed. Information in a measured spectrum might originate within the field of view (FoV) on the surface of the sample, from outside the FoV, or even from inherent contamination. To ensure that small structures can be measured correctly regardless of user and instru-ment, certain instrument and sample settings must be known and selected correctly: beam and aperture size as well as the aperture settings and the approximate dimensions of the structure to be analysed. This is the only way to ensure that the information in the spectrum originates only from the FoV on the analysed structure.
To test the performance of the XPS instruments, a dedicated test material was developed that consists of a gold surface on which 8 circles and 8 squares of chrome are incorpo-rated using a masking process, so that the Au substrate and the Cr structure surfaces are in the same surface plane. In order to be able to test as many as possible instruments from different manufacturers, the structures have been designed with a size ranging from 300 µm down to 7 µm. The layout of the test material has been optimised in regard of the handling. The structures are arranged along lines instead of a circumference, marking arrows around the smaller structures (≤50 µm) are added, and the lithography mask is optimised regarding edge and diffraction effects. Furthermore, the manufacturing process was changed from electron-beam deposition to mask lithography due to costs reasons. The structures on the test material were measured with a metrological SEM to determine their accurate dimensions and check the repeatability of the manufacturing process. XPS investigations with a Kratos AXIS Ultra DLD and an ULVAC-Phi Quantes demonstrates the suitability of this new test material for measuring the analysed area.
Ni-Fe oxide nanoparticles have gained a lot of interest because of their high activity in the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) which is crucial for water splitting. [1] Although there have been great efforts in the last years, the understanding of the synergistic effect between Fe and Ni is still under discussion.
Therefore, we prepared different Ni-Fe oxide nanoparticles with different compositions from pure iron oxide to pure nickel oxide adapting a known procedure. [2,3] Size and morphology of the nanoparticles depend on the composition which was shown with Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). The compositions of the nanoparticles were measured with a comparative approach using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), Hard X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (HAXPES), and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS) coupled with the TEM providing detailed chemical information of the nanoparticles in different sample regions. EDS reveals that the different sample regions are dominated by one of the components, Fe or Ni, but a slight mixing between the components can be found (see Figure 1), which was confirmed with X-ray Diffraction (XRD). XPS indicates the enrichment of Fe at the sample surface, while HAXPES and EDS data agree on the stoichiometry of the bulk. High-resolution XPS and HAXPES exhibit some differences in the valence states of Fe and Ni, whereas Ni seems to be easier to reduce than Fe. Further investigations combining these different techniques and additionally Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) are ongoing by using in situ approaches and coupling cyclic voltammetry to the analytical techniques.
The main properties and main methods which are needed for the physico-chemical characterisation of graphene related 2D materials are discussed. As expample for standardization, protocols for the measurement of the chemical composition with XPS are discussed. The results of an interlaboratory comparisons led to new recommendations for the reliable measurments protocols.
Graphene and related 2D materials (GR2Ms) are now entering an exciting phase of commercialization and use in products. Graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) can be obtained in rather large quantities, but the properties of these industrially produced powders can vary depending on the production method, and even from batch to batch. Understanding and optimizing the surface chemistry of GNPs, modified through chemical functionalization processes is crucial, because it affects their dispersibility in solvents and matrices for the purpose of embedding them into real-world products. Therefore, reliable and repeatable measurements of the surface chemistry of functionalized GNPs are an important issue for suppliers as well as users of these materials. To address these concerns, international documentary ISO standards for measurement methodologies are under development which incorporate protocols that are becoming widely accepted in the community.
Recently, it was shown that pelletizing led to lower average O/C atomic ratios than those measured for powders [1]. In another study, the influence of the morphology on the degree of functionalization was shown [2]. As expected, a higher degree of functionalization was detected for smaller GNPs. The functionalization was located at the outermost surfaces of the GNPs by comparing experiments using photoelectron with soft (Al Kα, 1.486 keV) and hard X-rays (Cr Kα, 5.405 keV). Therefore, it is important for those using GNPs to understand both the physical and chemical properties of these particles, when considering their use in different applications.
The next step for reliable characterization protocols was the realization of an interlaboratory comparison under the auspices of VAMAS (Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards) with 22 participating laboratories from all over the world. Samples of oxygen-, nitrogen-, and fluorine- functionalized GNPs were provided to the participants along with a measurement protocol. Participants were asked to prepare the samples as powders on a tape, powders in a sample holder recess, or as pellets. The lower measured O/C ratio reported for pelletized samples [1] was confirmed. The lowest scattering of the results was observed for the powders measured in the recess (Fig. 1). Furthermore, an influence of the humidity on the results was observed.
Interlaboratory comparisons (ILCs) are an important tool for the validation of characterisation methods, and, herwith, a prerequisite for standardisation. The "Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards" offers a framework for performing such ILCs: (i) TiO2 nanoparticles using ToF-SIMS, and (ii) the chemical composition of functionalized graphene using XPS. The results of both ILCs underline the importance of sample preparation for the measured results.
Optical measurements of scattering luminescent materials dispersed in liquid and solid matrices and luminescent powders play an important role in fundamental research and industry. Typical examples are luminescent nano- and microparticles and phosphors of different composition in different matrices or incorporated into ceramics with applications in energy conversion, solid-state lighting, medical diagnostics, and security barcoding. The key parameter for the performance of these materials is the photoluminescence quantum yield QY, i.e., the number of emitted photons per number of absorbed photons. QY of transparent luminophore solutions can be determined relatively to a fluorescence quantum yield standard of known QY. Such standards are meanwhile available as certified reference materials.[1] The determination of QY of scattering liquid and solid samples like dispersions of luminescent nanoparticles, solid phosphors, and optoceramics requires, however, absolute measurements with an integrating sphere setup. Although the importance of reliable absolute QY measurements has been recognized, no interlaboratory comparisons (ILCs) on measurement uncertainties and the identification of typical sources of uncertainty have been yet reported. Also, no scattering reference materials with known QY are available.
We present here the results of a first ILC of 3 laboratories from academia and industry performed to identify and quantify sources of uncertainty of absolute QY measurements of scattering samples. Thereby, two types of commercial stand-alone integrating sphere setups with different illumination and detection geometries were utilized for measuring QY of transparent and scattering dye solutions and solid phosphors. As representative and industrially relevant solid and scattering samples, YAG:Ce optoceramics of varying surface roughness were chosen, applied, e.g., as converter materials for blue light emitting diodes. Special emphasis was dedicated to the influence of the measurement geometry, the optical properties of the blank, utilized to determine the number of photons of the incident excitation light absorbed by the sample, and the sample-specific surface roughness. While matching QY values could be obtained for transparent dye solutions and scattering dispersions, here using a blank with scattering properties closely matching those of the sample, QY measurements of optoceramic samples with different blanks revealed substantial differences, with the blank's optical
properties accounting for measurement uncertainties of more than 20 %. Based upon the ILC results, we recommend non-absorbing blank materials with a high reflectivity (>95 %) such as a 2 mm-thick PTFE target placed on the sample holder which reveals a near-Lambertian light scattering behavior, yielding a homogeneous light distribution within the integrating sphere.
Characterization and quantification of functional groups and coatings on nanoobjects an overview
(2024)
Characterization of Nanoparticles – Questions to Ask, Functional Nanoparticles (NPs) – Organic, Inorganic, and Hybrid Nanoparticles Nanomaterial Characterization Standardization – Addressing Remaining Gaps Surface FGs Particle Surface Chemistry - Why is it Important? Particle Surface Chemistry - A Key Driver for Performance, Applications, and Safety Aspects Method Development for Quantifying FGs and Ligands on Particle Surfaces FG Quantification – Method Choice & Criteria Relevant for Data Interpretation Quantifying the Amount of Total and Accessible FGs on Aminated Silica Nanoparticles (SiO2-NH2) Comparing the Total and Accessible –NH2 Content on Aminated Silica NPs of Different Size Characterization of Nanoparticles Standardization Standardized Measurements of Surface FGs on Nanoparticles EMP Project SMURFnano EMP Project SMURFnano Work Packages & Goals Certified Reference Materials from BAM
Despite the physiological and pathophysiological significance of microenvironmental gradients, e.g., for diseases such as cancer, tools for generating such gradients and analyzing their impact are lacking. Here, we present an integrated microfluidic-based workflow that mimics extracellular pH gradients characteristic of solid tumors while enabling high-resolution live imaging of, e.g., cell motility and chemotaxis, and preserving the capacity to capture the spatial transcriptome. Our microfluidic device generates a pH gradient that can be rapidly controlled to mimic spatiotemporal microenvironmental changes over cancer cells embedded in a 3D matrix. The device can be reopened allowing immunofluorescence analysis of selected phenotypes, as well as the transfer of cells and matrix to a Visium slide for spatially resolved analysis of transcriptional changes across the pH gradient. This workflow is easily adaptable to other gradients and multiple cell types and can therefore prove invaluable for integrated analysis of roles of microenvironmental gradients in biology.