Chemie und Prozesstechnik
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (44)
- Vortrag (7)
- Beitrag zu einem Sammelband (5)
- Sonstiges (2)
- Posterpräsentation (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (59)
Schlagworte
- XPS (25)
- NEXAFS (8)
- Nanoparticles (7)
- Graphene (5)
- Surface chemical analysis (5)
- Core-shell (4)
- Metrology (4)
- Bacteria (3)
- Biofilms (3)
- NAP-XPS (3)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 6 Materialchemie (59)
- 6.1 Oberflächen- und Dünnschichtanalyse (59)
- 4 Material und Umwelt (5)
- 4.1 Biologische Materialschädigung und Referenzorganismen (5)
- 1 Analytische Chemie; Referenzmaterialien (1)
- 1.2 Biophotonik (1)
- 6.2 Material- und Oberflächentechnologien (1)
- 9 Komponentensicherheit (1)
- 9.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (1)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (7)
In this talk sample prep/handling, instrument calibration and data acquisition methods with examples from XPS, Auger and SIMS will be addressed in terms of their contributions to the reproducibility of data delivered by the methods.
Active parties in the field are VAMAS TWA 2 “Surface chemical analysis” (http://www.vamas.org/twa2/index.html), ISO/TC 201 “Surface chemical analysis” (https://www.iso.org/committee/54618.html) and the Surface Analysis Working Group (SAWG) at the International Meter Convention (https://www.bipm.org/en/ committees/cc/wg/sawg.html). The tools to improve the reproducibility of spectra, depth profiles and images at these international platforms are inter-laboratory comparisons, validated SOPs, standards and certified reference materials (CRM) as well as uncertainty budgets and establishment of traceability chains. The last point is of specific importance because all the methods, XPS, Auger and SIMS, are not primary methods.
To address quantitative XPS, AES and SIMS results of relevant inter-laboratory comparisons organized by SAWG considering measurands as alloy surface composition and thickness of thin films will be introduced. These comparisons delivered results which are viewed to be benchmarking, some of them resulted in ISO/TC 201 standards. For quantitative XPS and AES the principal outline of an uncertainty budget will be discussed together with the audience. Another issue of quantitative XPS which definitely needs consideration are valid methods for a determination of the transmission function of the instruments and even for the emission angle in the respective experiments.
Concerning the field of depth profiling it has to be investigated together with the audience whether the ISO (or ASTM) standards we have are sufficient to guarantee comparable results. Having in mind the number of different sputter ion species available today and range of samples of interest (metals, semiconductors, organic films) this might be questionable. And, how do depth profiling by AR-XPS and variable excitation energy XPS compete here?
For imaging surface chemical analysis, the characterization of the imaging system is an issue to be investigated. Here the determination of lateral resolution is a relevant topic.
Finally, the future needs to develop metrology for new applications e.g., ambient-pressure XPS, bio samples, and core-shell nanoparticles, will be issues raised for a discussion with the audience.
This talk was given within the scope of the SIMS-22 conference in October 2019 in Kyoto (Japan). It deals with the surface analytical investigation of nanoparticles by PCS-assisted ToF-SIMS. This technique is applicable to core-shell nanoparticles, in order to distinguish a complete encapsulation from an incomplete encapsulation of the core by the shell material. Furthermore, the depletion process of organic nanoparticle coatings caused by UV-weathering is investigated. Finally, the significance of grouping studies for nanomaterials research and risk assessment is demonstrated.
Dr Martin Seah, NPL, was the initiator, founder, and first chairman of the Surface Analysis Working Group (SAWG) at the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance, Metrology in Chemistry and Biology (CCQM) at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), the international organization established by the Metre Convention. This tribute letter summarizes his achievements during his chairmanship and his long-running impact on the successful work of the group after his retirement.
ISO 18516:2019 Surface chemical analysis—Determination of lateral resolution and sharpness in beam-based methods with a range from nanometres to micrometres revises ISO 18516:2006 Surface chemical analysis—Auger electron spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy—Determination of lateral resolution. It implements three different methods delivering parameters useful to express the lateral resolution: (1) the straight edge method, (2) the narrow line method and (3) the grating method. The theoretical background of these methods is introduced in ISO/TR 19319:2013 Surface chemical analysis—Fundamental approaches to determination of lateral resolution and sharpness in beam-based methods. The revised International Standard ISO 18516 delivers standardized procedures for the determination of the (1) effective lateral resolution by imaging of square-wave gratings, the (2) lateral resolution expressed as the parameter D12–88 characterizing the steepness of the sigmoidal edge spread function (ESF) determined by imaging a straight edge and (3) the lateral resolution expressed as the full width of half maximum of the line spread function (LSF), wLSF, determined by imaging a narrow line. The last method also delivers information on the shape of the LSF, which characterizes an individual imaging instrument. Finally, the implementation of all three standardized methods in the field of imaging laboratory X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is shortly presented. This part of the letter is based on the use of a new test sample developed at ETH Zurich, Switzerland. This test sample displays a micrometre scaled pattern motivated by the resolving power of recent imaging XPS instruments.
Imaging and small-spot (small area) XPS have become increasingly important components of surface chemical analysis during the last three decades, and its use is growing. Some ambiguity in the use of terminology, understanding of concepts, and lack of appropriate reference materials leads to confusing and not always reproducible data. In this paper, it is shown that by using existing knowledge, appropriate test specimens, and standardized approaches, problems of comparability and such reproducibility issues recently observed for XPS data reported in the scientific literature can be overcome. The standardized methods of ISO 18516:2019, (i) the straight-edge, (ii) the narrow-line, and (iii) the grating method, can be used to characterize and compare the lateral resolution achieved by imaging XPS instruments and are described by reporting examples. The respective measurements are made using new test specimens. When running an XPS instrument in the small-spot (small area) mode for a quantitative analysis of a feature of interest, the question arises as to what contribution to the intensity originates from outside the analysis area. A valid measurement approach to control the intensity from outside the nominal analysis area is also described. As always, the relevant resolution depends on the specific question that needs to be addressed. The strengths and limitations of methods defining resolution are indicated.
Auger electron spectroscopy
(2020)
An introduction in the application of Auger Electron Spectroscopy to surface chemical analysis of nanoparticles is given. Auger Electron Spectroscopy is a mature method in the field of surface chemical analysis. The chapter addresses the physical basis of the method, the principal design of recent instruments together with modes of operation and options for the presentation of spectra, as well as different approaches for qualitative (including identification of chemical species) and quantitative surface analysis of elements. An application paragraph on surface chemical analysis of nanoparticles by AES or SAM introduces the different measurement approaches and sample preparation strategies applied by analysts. The analysis of nanoparticle ensembles, the so-called selected point analysis where a narrow primary electron beam is centered on an individual nanoparticle, and chemical mapping of individual nanoparticles (or a line scan across) are addressed. Existing literature is reviewed and informative case studies presented. Limitations and pitfalls in the application of AES in surface chemical analysis of nanoparticles are also addressed.
Reversible light-modulation of fulgimide based monolayers on Si(1 1 1) and Si(1 0 0) was investigated using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Fulgimide monolayers were prepared from neat COOH-terminated SAMs on Si(1 1 1) obtained from methyl undec-10-enoate, (1:1)-diluted COOH-terminated monolayers on Si(1 1 1), and GPTMS monolayers on Si(1 0 0). The epoxy-terminated monolayer on oxidized Si(1 0 0) was characterized with ellipsometry, XPS, as well as contact angle measurements, and ATR-FTIR spectroscopy revealed a strong influence of toluene water content on reproducible high-quality monolayer formation. The results of this study show that environmental polarity has a strong influence on fulgimide imide IR band locations and read-out options for the two photostationary states PSS(365 nm), containing E/Z- and C-isomers, and PSS(545 nm), with solely the E/Zisomers.
Neat COOH-terminated monolayers on flat Si(1 1 1) have the Advantage of high functional Group concentration, orientation and stability, and an upright arrangement of fulgimide head groups.
Controlling thickness and tightness of surface passivation shells is crucial for many applications of core–shell nanoparticles (NP). Usually, to determine shell thickness, core and core/shell particle are measured individually requiring the availability of both nanoobjects. This is often not fulfilled for functional nanomaterials such as many photoluminescent semiconductor quantum dots (QD) used for bioimaging, solid state lighting, and display technologies as the core does not show the applicationrelevant functionality like a high photoluminescence (PL) quantum yield, calling for a whole nanoobject approach. By combining high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), a novel whole nanoobject approach is developed representatively for an ultrabright oleic acid-stabilized, thick shell CdSe/CdS QD with a PL quantum yield close to unity. The size of this spectroscopically assessed QD, is in the range of the information depth of usual laboratory XPS. Information on particle size and monodispersity were validated with dynamic light scattering (DLS) and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and compared to data derived from optical measurements. In addition to demonstrating the potential of this novel whole nanoobject approach for determining architectures of small nanoparticles, the presented results also highlight challenges faced by different sizing and structural analysis methods and method-inherent uncertainties.