7.2 Ingenieurbau
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (168)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (67)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (16)
- Posterpräsentation (10)
- Dissertation (4)
- Beitrag zu einem Sammelband (3)
- Buchkapitel (2)
- Tagungsband (Herausgeberschaft für den kompletten Band) (1)
- Sonstiges (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (196)
- Deutsch (75)
- Mehrsprachig (1)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (272) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Structural Health Monitoring (22)
- Ground vibration (18)
- Fatigue (12)
- Offshore wind energy (11)
- Structural health monitoring (11)
- Monitoring (10)
- Brücken (9)
- Offshore (9)
- Impact (8)
- Building vibration (7)
- Damage characterization (7)
- Planar tomography (7)
- Vibration measurements (7)
- Bahnerschütterungen (6)
- Design methods (6)
- Deterioration (6)
- Hammer impact (6)
- Layered soil (6)
- Model interpolation (6)
- Numerical modelling (6)
- Offshore wind turbines (6)
- Physical phenomenology (6)
- Pile foundations (6)
- Soil-structure interaction (6)
- Structural systems (6)
- Grout (5)
- Inspection (5)
- Numeric simulation (5)
- Reinforced concrete structure (5)
- SHM (5)
- Train passage (5)
- Train-induced ground vibration (5)
- Vibration (5)
- Bayesian updating (4)
- Container loading (4)
- Crack detection (4)
- Damage detection (4)
- Datenmanagement (4)
- Drop test (4)
- Environmental effects (4)
- Erschütterungen (4)
- Erschütterungsminderung (4)
- Excitation forces (4)
- Foundation load (4)
- Foundations (4)
- Gründungsstrukturen (4)
- High-strength concrete (4)
- Interface (4)
- Layered soils (4)
- Modalanalyse (4)
- Reliability (4)
- Repair (4)
- Shell Buckling (4)
- Slab track (4)
- Steel structures (4)
- Temperature rejection (4)
- Ultrasonic testing (4)
- Vehicle-track-soil interaction (4)
- Wind Energy (4)
- Windenergie (4)
- BIM (3)
- Belastungsversuch (3)
- Bridges (3)
- Buckling (3)
- Compaction Grouting (3)
- Damage localization (3)
- Deep foundations (3)
- Dispersionsmessung (3)
- Elastische Gleiselemente (3)
- Emission (3)
- Erosion (3)
- Erschütterungsprognose (3)
- Fault detection (3)
- Großer Fallturm Horstwalde (3)
- Inspection planning (3)
- Leichtbau (3)
- Maintenance (3)
- Material moisture (3)
- Mitigation (3)
- Monopiles (3)
- Offshore Pile Foundation (3)
- Offshore Windenergieanlagen (3)
- Offshore foundations (3)
- Offshore geomechanics (3)
- Physical testing (3)
- Probabilistic (3)
- Reinforced concrete (3)
- Schwingungsdynamik (3)
- Subspace methods (3)
- Temperature effects (3)
- Train speed (3)
- Tunnel (3)
- Vibration measurement (3)
- Wellengeschwindigkeit (3)
- Wind (3)
- Zivile Sicherheit (3)
- 2-span bridge (2)
- AISTEC (2)
- Acceleration sensors (2)
- Acoustic emission testing (2)
- Amplitude-charge weight laws (2)
- Amplitude-distance laws (2)
- Analysis of variance (2)
- Ansys Autodyn (2)
- Apartment building (2)
- Artificial intelligence (2)
- Attenuation (2)
- Automatisierte schweißtechnische Fertigung (2)
- Axle-sequence spectrum (2)
- Bayes'sche Analyse (2)
- Bayesian System Identification (2)
- Bayesian methods (2)
- Bemessung (2)
- Big Data (2)
- Bitumen (2)
- Bodenübertragungsfunktion (2)
- Box-Behnken (2)
- Brücke (2)
- Cable failure (2)
- Cable-stayed bridge (2)
- Changing process noise (2)
- Chemisoprtion (2)
- Climate chamber (2)
- Compressive Cyclic loading (2)
- Compressive cyclic loading (2)
- Compressive strength (2)
- Coupled fluid-particle simulation (2)
- Coupler systems (2)
- Crack formation (2)
- Crack pattern (2)
- Cracks (2)
- Cyclic load (2)
- DEM (2)
- DUCON® (2)
- Design (2)
- Digital twin (2)
- Displacements (2)
- Drone (2)
- Drucker-Prager (2)
- Ductility (2)
- E-modulus (2)
- Earth masonry (2)
- Elastische Elemente (2)
- Energy (2)
- Erschütterungsausbreitung (2)
- Evaluation (2)
- Explosion-induced ground vibrations (2)
- Faseroptik (2)
- Feuchte (2)
- Filter effects (2)
- Finite Elemente Simulation (2)
- Finite element models (2)
- Fly ash (2)
- Freight train (2)
- GPU parallel computation (2)
- Gleiströge (2)
- Ground vibration measurements (2)
- Grouted Connection (2)
- Grouted connection (2)
- Grouting (2)
- Halbraum (2)
- High-performance computing (2)
- High-speed (2)
- High-speed train (2)
- Immission (2)
- Injection Sequence (2)
- Irregularities (2)
- Klimakammer (2)
- Knudsen effect (2)
- Laboratory beam structure (2)
- Lehm (2)
- Linear parameter varying systems (2)
- Load vector (2)
- Long-term shrinkage (2)
- Macromechanical Sample Strength (2)
- Material tests (2)
- Mauerwerk (2)
- Measurement (2)
- Measurements (2)
- Messen im Bauwesen (2)
- Metakaolin (2)
- Micro silica (2)
- Micro-reinforcement (2)
- Micromechanical Tensile Failure (2)
- Micromechanical modelling (2)
- Mobile elements (2)
- Modal Analysis (2)
- Molecular diffusion (2)
- Non destructive testing (2)
- Non-destructive testing (2)
- Numerical model (2)
- Numerical modeling (2)
- Office tower (2)
- Offshore Wind Energy (2)
- Offshore Windenergy Pile Buckling (2)
- Offshore geotechnics (2)
- Offshore wind (2)
- Offshore wind turbine (2)
- Offshore-Windenergieanlagen (2)
- Optimal Sensor Placement (2)
- Passenger train (2)
- Physisorption (2)
- Pile Foundation (2)
- Pile Tip Buckling (2)
- Post-impact evaluation (2)
- Prediction (2)
- Prediction of explosion induced ground and building vibration (2)
- Prädiktive Instandhaltung (2)
- Quasi-static and dynamic tests (2)
- Radar (2)
- Railway (2)
- Railway bridge (2)
- Railway tunnel (2)
- Railways (2)
- Randomly heterogeneous soil (2)
- Rehabilitation (2)
- Reinforcement (2)
- Research data management (2)
- Risk (2)
- Risslumineszenz (2)
- SDDLV (2)
- Scattering (2)
- Schadensdetektion (2)
- Schwingungsbasierte Verfahren (2)
- Size effect (2)
- Slenderness effect (2)
- Soil properties (2)
- Soil-Structure-Interaction (2)
- Soil-pile interaction (2)
- Soil-wall-floor model (2)
- Static load (2)
- Statistical evaluation (2)
- Statistical method (2)
- Stereo photogrammetry (2)
- Subspace-based method (2)
- Subspace-based residual (2)
- Suction bucket (2)
- Supplementary cementitious materials (2)
- Surface-tunnel reduction (2)
- System Identification (2)
- Tensile Capacity (2)
- Time-variant reliability (2)
- Tomographic damage evaluation (2)
- Track damage (2)
- Train excitation (2)
- Transmission (2)
- UHPC (2)
- Umwelteinflüsse (2)
- Unterraummethoden (2)
- Value of Information (2)
- Vehicle-track interaction (2)
- Vibrations (2)
- Vollraum (2)
- Wellenausbreitung (2)
- Wellenausbreitung in der Tiefe (2)
- Wind Turbines (2)
- Windenergy (2)
- Zuggeschwindigkeit (2)
- Zuverlässigkeit (2)
- 3D imaging (1)
- Achsfolgespektren (1)
- Achsimpulse (1)
- Amplituden-Abstands-Gesetze (1)
- Analytical Design Methods (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
- Asphalt (1)
- Assessment (1)
- Asymptotic local approach (1)
- Automatic modal parameters identification (1)
- Automatisierte Fertigung (1)
- Automatisierte schweißtechniche Fertigung (1)
- Axial load bearing (1)
- Axle impulses (1)
- Axle loads (1)
- Axle pulses (1)
- BAM Windenergie Fügetechnik (1)
- Bahngleis (1)
- Ballast track (1)
- Base isolation (1)
- Baugrunddynamik (1)
- Bauteile (1)
- Bauwerk-Boden-Wechselwirkung (1)
- Bauwerke (1)
- Bauwerksmonitoring (1)
- Bauwerksüberwachung (1)
- Bayesian analysis (1)
- Bayesian system identification (1)
- Beanspruchungszustand (1)
- Belastungsfahrt (1)
- Belastungszug (1)
- Beton (1)
- Betonautobahn (1)
- Betonautobahnen (1)
- Beulen (1)
- Bewertung (1)
- Bionik (1)
- Blast (1)
- Blast tests (1)
- Bodenschlitz (1)
- Bodenvariabilität (1)
- Boundary element method (1)
- Bridge (1)
- Bridge monitoring (1)
- Bruchlastwechselzahlen (1)
- Brückensicherheit (1)
- Buckling piles circular shells (1)
- Building information modelling (1)
- Building response (1)
- Bulging (1)
- CFD (1)
- Cars (1)
- Centerline solidification cracking (1)
- Chemisorption (1)
- Civil structures (1)
- Climate Chamber (1)
- Cohesive soils (1)
- Column/wall resonance (1)
- Combined finite-element boundary-element method (1)
- Components of excitation (1)
- Computer Vision (1)
- Concrete (1)
- Conductor (1)
- Crack (1)
- Crack Luminescence (1)
- Crack growth (1)
- Crack repair (1)
- Cyclic axial shearing (1)
- Cyclic degradation (1)
- DEM-LBM simulation (1)
- Damage Detection (1)
- Damage identification (1)
- Deckeneigenfrequenzen (1)
- Deckenschwingungen (1)
- Design models (1)
- Design practice (1)
- Detection (1)
- DiMoWind RDS-PP Maintenance Digital Twin Offshore Wind Energy (1)
- Digital Image Correlation (1)
- Digital Models (1)
- Digital Twin (1)
- Digitale Zwillinge (1)
- Digitalisierung (1)
- Drop Test (1)
- Drop Tests (1)
- Drop tower (1)
- Druckfestigkeit (1)
- Druckschwellenversuch (1)
- Dynamic loads (1)
- Dynamic soil properties (1)
- Dynamische Bodenkennwerte (1)
- Dynamische Bodensteifigkeit (1)
- Dämpfung (1)
- EERA Joint Program (1)
- Earth (1)
- Earth material (1)
- Earthen hydraulic constructions (1)
- Earthen hydraulic infrastructures (1)
- Einflusslinie (1)
- Einflusslinien (1)
- Einfügungsdämmung (1)
- Elastische Gebäudelagerung (1)
- End-of-life decision making (1)
- Entscheidungsfindung (1)
- Environmental (1)
- Environmental Effects (1)
- Environmental influence (1)
- Erhaltungsmanagement (1)
- Ermüdungsprüfung (1)
- Ermüdungsschäden (1)
- Ermüdungsverhalten (1)
- Erneuerbare Energien (1)
- Erosion of cohesive soils (1)
- Erschütterungen im Fernfeld (1)
- FEM (1)
- FEM analysis (1)
- Fahrzeug-Fahrweg-Boden-Wechselwirkung (1)
- Fallturm (1)
- Fatigue damage (1)
- Fatigue deterioration (1)
- Fiber optic sensing (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Finite element model updating (1)
- Finite-Elemente-Modellkalibrierung (1)
- Flexibility (1)
- Flexible car body (1)
- Flexible wheelset (1)
- Floor resonance (1)
- Floors (1)
- Fluid-structure interaction (1)
- Footbridge (1)
- Force reconstruction (1)
- Foundation Pile (1)
- Foundation reliability analysis (1)
- Freileitung (1)
- Frequency response function (1)
- GMNIA (1)
- GNSS (1)
- GPU parallelisation (1)
- Gebäudelagerung (1)
- Gebäudemodelle (1)
- Gebäudeschwingungen (1)
- Geomechanics (1)
- Geomechanics of offshore foundations (1)
- Geometrie (1)
- Global ambient vibrations (1)
- Granular Cohesive Materials (1)
- Granular Cohesive Materials, (1)
- Ground (1)
- Grout Injection (1)
- HTLS (1)
- Hard impact (1)
- Harter Anprall an Stahlbetonstrukturen (1)
- High-Rise Building (1)
- High-rise buildings (1)
- Horizontal stress (1)
- IEPE (1)
- Impact damage of reinforced concrete (1)
- Impact damage on reinforced concrete (1)
- Impakt (1)
- Impedanzmethode (1)
- Inertial Interaction (1)
- Inertial interaction (1)
- Inhomogeneous soils (1)
- Innovative Messtechnik (1)
- Inspeciton (1)
- Inspektion (1)
- Interface model (1)
- Irregular ballast (1)
- Irregular soil (1)
- Jacket support structure (1)
- Jet erosion test (1)
- Kinematic Interaction (1)
- Kinematic interaction (1)
- Kraft auf den Boden (1)
- LBM-DEM (1)
- LBM-DEM coupling (1)
- LBM-DEM simulation (1)
- Laminography (1)
- Laser beam welding (1)
- Lateral load bearing (1)
- Leichtbauprinzipien (1)
- Load Test (1)
- Load bearing behaviour (1)
- Load-bearing (1)
- Long-span bridge (1)
- Low-frequency shaker (1)
- Luminescence (1)
- MEMS (1)
- Maintal Bridge Gemuenden (1)
- Maintalbrücke Gemünden (1)
- Maintenance Digital Twin Offshore Wind Energy (1)
- Marine geomechanics (1)
- Marine geotechnics (1)
- Maschinenbetrieb (1)
- Material Point Method (1)
- Material model (1)
- Measurement campaigns (1)
- Mechanical challenges (1)
- Messfahrt (1)
- Microfine cement (1)
- Micromechanical LBM-DEM simulation (1)
- Micromechanical analysis (1)
- Micromechanical simulation (1)
- Minderungsmaßnahmen (1)
- Mix design (1)
- Modal force spectrum (1)
- Modal load spectrum (1)
- Modal system identification (1)
- Model Update (1)
- Model updating (1)
- Modellierung (1)
- Modes (1)
- Modes and waves (1)
- Moisture (1)
- Monopile (1)
- Monopile Buckling (1)
- Monopile installation risks (1)
- Movin load test (1)
- Multi-beam method (1)
- Multiple impact (1)
- NDT (1)
- Nachgiebigkeiten (1)
- Nelson’s method (1)
- Non-Destructive Evaluation (1)
- Normung (1)
- Numerical analysis (1)
- Numerical damage simulation (1)
- Numerical simulation (1)
- Numerical simulation of impact damage (1)
- Numerical simulations (1)
- Offhore (1)
- Office building (1)
- Offshore Structures (1)
- Offshore Wind (1)
- Offshore Wind Energy Converter (1)
- Offshore Windenergie (1)
- Offshore pile foundations (1)
- Offshore wind energy foundations (1)
- Offshore wind farm (1)
- Offshore wind farms (1)
- Offshore wind-turbine foundations (1)
- Offshore-Wind (1)
- Operational modal analysis (1)
- Optimierungsmethoden (1)
- Optimization techniques (1)
- Pfahlfußbeulen (1)
- Pfahlnachgiebigkeiten (1)
- Physisoprtion (1)
- Pile Buckling (1)
- Pile Capacity (1)
- Pile ageing (1)
- Pile groups (1)
- Pile retrofit system (1)
- Pile-Tip-Buckling (1)
- Point Cloud (1)
- Predictive maintenance (1)
- Probabilistic modelling (1)
- Probabilitische Ingenieurmodelle (1)
- Probability of Detection (1)
- Probability of detection (1)
- Probekörpergeometrien (1)
- Prognose (1)
- Propagation from a tunnel (1)
- Railbridge (1)
- Railway induced vibration (1)
- Railway track (1)
- Railway tracks (1)
- Railway trafiic (1)
- Randelementmethode (1)
- Rayleighwellendispersion (1)
- Rechenmodelle (1)
- Rechenverfahren (1)
- Repowering (1)
- Residential building (1)
- Residual evaluation (1)
- Richtige Fahrzeugmasse (1)
- Rigid vehicle model (1)
- Risiko (1)
- Risikoanalyse (1)
- Risk-based maintenance planning (1)
- Rissprozes (1)
- Rissprozess (1)
- Road bridges (1)
- SHM Environmental (1)
- Safety (1)
- Scaling (1)
- Scattered axle impulses (1)
- Schadensüberwachung (1)
- Scherwellengeschwindigkeit (1)
- Schienenfahrweg (1)
- Schienenfahrwege (1)
- Schubmodul (1)
- Schwingungsmessungen (1)
- Schwingungsmonitoring (1)
- Schädigungsprozesse (1)
- Sensitivity vectors (1)
- Shearing (1)
- Shrinkage (1)
- Sicherheit (1)
- Simple and fast prediction (1)
- Simple prediction (1)
- Simulation and experiment (1)
- Site-characterization (1)
- Soft impact (1)
- Soft track elements (1)
- Soil Struture Interaction (1)
- Soil erosion (1)
- Soil-building interaction (1)
- Soil-building resonance (1)
- Soil-wall floor model (1)
- Soil-water-structure interaction (1)
- Spatially varying ground conditions (1)
- Spektralanalyse (1)
- Stability Buckling soil-structure-interaction piles offshore (1)
- Stabilität (1)
- State of stress (1)
- Statistical correlations (1)
- Statistical tests (1)
- Statistische Auswertung (1)
- Statistische Korrelationen (1)
- Stochastic Subspace Damage Detection (1)
- Strength (1)
- Stress stiffening (1)
- Structural Systems (1)
- Structural integrity (1)
- Structural integrity maintenance (1)
- Structural integrity management (1)
- Strukturmonitoring (1)
- Störgrößen (1)
- Substructures (1)
- Support structures (1)
- Surface Foundation (1)
- Surface line (1)
- Switch (1)
- System identification (1)
- Systemidentifikation (1)
- TOP (1)
- Tagung (1)
- Temperatureinflüsse (1)
- Tensile test (1)
- Test specification (1)
- Tip Buckling (1)
- Track and vehicle irregularities (1)
- Track beam (1)
- Track damage monitoring (1)
- Track damage quantification (1)
- Track vibration (1)
- Track-soil interaction (1)
- Tragfähigkeit (1)
- Tragstrukturen (1)
- Train configuration (1)
- Train passages (1)
- Tran speed (1)
- Transfer fuction (1)
- Transfer function (1)
- Truss structures (1)
- Tunnel line (1)
- Tunnel-pile transfer (1)
- Tunnelstrecke (1)
- Turnout (1)
- Un- certainty (1)
- Uncertainty (1)
- Uncertainty in reference (1)
- Uncertainty quantification (1)
- Under-sleeper pads (1)
- Varying soil stiffness (1)
- Varying stiffness (1)
- Varying track stiffness (1)
- Vibration analysis (1)
- Vibration excitation (1)
- Vibration monitoring (1)
- Wahrscheinlichkeit (1)
- Water-structure interaction (1)
- Wave-Tower interaction (1)
- Wavenumber integrals (1)
- Wavenumber method (1)
- Waves (1)
- Welded (1)
- Wellenfeldberechnung (1)
- Wheelset accelerations (1)
- Wind Energy Structures (1)
- Wind energy (1)
- Wind turbines (1)
- Wind-farm aerodynamics (1)
- Windenergieanlagen (1)
- Windfarm wake analysis (1)
- Zerstreute Achsimpulse (1)
- building information modelling (1)
- elastische Gebäudelagerungen (1)
- fachwerkartige Stahltragwerken (1)
- risk, reliability, inspection planning, offshore wind turbines (1)
- structural health monitoring (1)
- structural integrity management (1)
- support structures (1)
- zerstreute Achslastimpulse (1)
- Übertragungsmatrizen (1)
- Überwachung (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 7.2 Ingenieurbau (272) (entfernen)
The resonances of railway bridges have often been analysed for short bridges under periodical high-speed trains, for simply supported one-span bridges, for the fundamental bridge mode, and by time-domain analyses. Many time-consuming calculations have been performed to establish simplified rules for standards. In this contribution, the passage of different (existing, new and hypothetic) trains over different bridges will be analysed in frequency domain by using three separated spectra with the purpose to get a better physical insight in the phenomena. At first, the excitation spectrum of the modal forces is built by the mode shape and the passage time of the train over the bridge. The second spectrum is the frequency response function of the bridge which include the modal frequency, damping and mass. The third part is the spectrum of the axle sequence of an arbitrary train which is not limited to periodical or specific (conventional, articulated, regular or standard) trains and which does not include any bridge parameters. The final solution in frequency domain is obtained as the product of these three complex, strongly varying spectra for the dominating bridge mode or in general as the sum of these products over all relevant bridge modes. The time domain solution is obtained via the inverse Fourier transform, and the resulting time histories have been successfully compared with some measurement results. The method is applied to the vertical and torsional modes of a mid-long 1-span bridge on elastomeric bearings under standard train speeds, and to a long multi-span integral bridge under long periodical freight trains. Different resonance and cancellation effects have been found for systematically varied train speeds according to the axle sequence of the whole train which is dominated by the two locomotives in that case. To be more specific, the first torsional mode of the mid-span bridge is excited for a train speed of 100 km/h whereas the second bending mode is excited for a train speed of 160 km/h. In both cases, the other mode is suppressed by the minima of the axle-distance spectra. In addition, the case of the German high-speed train ICE4 and the very high-speed hyperloop case will be discussed briefly. In general, it is shown that resonance effects are also worth to be studied for freight and passenger trains with lower speeds.
Train-induced ground vibrations – The emission and transmission from tunnel and surface lines
(2023)
Train-induced ground vibrations are quite different for tunnel and surface lines. The excitation of the track and ground vibration by the vehicle-track-soil interaction maybe influenced by the stiffer track support of the tunnel invert. The excited waves are propagating on a different path compared to the surface line. The wave propagation in the interior of the soil is calculated by a wavenumber integral in a similar way as the propagation along the surface and a general reduction of < 0.5 has been found. An additional reduction has been found because of the missing Rayleigh wave. The different excitation of tunnel lines is analysed theoretically by the combined finite-element boundary-element method and some results about the influencing tunnel and soil parameters will be shown. Measurements have been made at the Mühlberg-Tunnel in Germany. The vibrations of the train, the track and the soil have been measured simultaneously at the tunnel and a nearby surface line. Spectra will be shown for different train speeds between 60 and 160 km/h. A clear reduction effect for the tunnel line compared to the surface line has been observed in a specific (train-speed-dependent) frequency range. This agrees well with the observations of other research institutes. The mid-frequency tunnel-surface reduction seems to be a consequence of the stiffer track structure which leads to a wider distribution of the axle loads. Therefore, the axle impulses due to the train passage are longer and have a lower frequency content. This will have an effect on the ground vibrations at some distance which are present in case of an irregular transmission path through a ballast and soil with varying stiffness. A similar reduction effect can also be found for other track forms where the axle impulses are distributed on a longer track segment, for example slab tracks, tracks with under ballast plates, under ballast mats or under sleeper pads.
The soil-foundation-structure interaction is always important when building vibrations due to train passages have to be considered. The frequency range for train vibrations is up to 100 Hz. Normally, soft surface soils are crucial so that the wavelength can be much smaller than the foundation dimensions. Three topics are of interest for the prediction and the under-standing of building vibrations. 1. The „kinematic interaction“ or the „added foundation ef-fect“, which is calculated either by the combined boundary-element finite-element method or by the wavenumber domain method, results in a reduction of the free-field vibration. The stiff-ness of the foundation resists the wave deformation, plates and walls for horizontally propa-gating waves or piles for vertically incident waves. 2. The „inertial interaction“ or the „added building effect“ yields an amplification around the vertical building resonance, which may be a rigid mode on the compliant soil or a flexible mode for high-rise buildings, and a reduction at higher frequencies. This has been analysed by detailed finite element models of apartment and office buildings. 3. Base isolation is a method to further reduce building vibrations. It is important to know the soil-foundation impedance for the possible reduction, as well as the correct building impedance. A high-rise building cannot be considered as a rigid mass model. It has a frequency-dependent behaviour with longitudinal waves travelling from the founda-tion to the top of the building which include the effect of floor vibrations. Experiences from building projects in Vienna, Frankfort and Berlin will give some additional results for the ex-citation from tunnel lines, the kinematic response of pile foundations, and the inertial re-sponse of the flexible multi-storey buildings.
The resonances of railway bridges have often been analysed for short bridges under periodical high-speed trains, for simply supported one-span bridges, for the fundamental bridge mode, and by time-domain analyses. Many time-consuming calculations have been performed to establish simplified rules for standards. In this contribution, the passage of different (existing, new and hypothetic) trains over different bridges will be analysed in frequency domain by using three separated spectra with the purpose to get a better physical insight in the phenomena. At first, the excitation spectrum of the modal forces is built by the mode shape and the passage time of the train over the bridge. The second spectrum is the frequency response function of the bridge which include the modal frequency, damping and mass. The third part is the spectrum of the axle sequence of an arbitrary train which is not limited to periodical or specific (conventional, articulated, regular or standard) trains and which does not include any bridge parameters. The final solution in frequency domain is obtained as the product of these three complex, strongly varying spectra for the dominating bridge mode or in general as the sum of these products over all relevant bridge modes. The time domain solution is obtained via the inverse Fourier transform, and the resulting time histories have been successfully compared with some measurement results. The method is applied to the vertical and torsional modes of a mid-long 1-span bridge on elastomeric bearings under standard train speeds, and to a long multi-span integral bridge under long periodical freight trains. Different resonance and cancellation effects have been found for systematically varied train speeds according to the axle sequence of the whole train which is dominated by the two locomotives in that case. To be more specific, the first torsional mode of the mid-span bridge is excited for a train speed of 100 km/h whereas the second bending mode is excited for a train speed of 160 km/h. In both cases, the other mode is suppressed by the minima of the axle-distance spectra. In addition, the case of the German high-speed train ICE4 and the very high-speed hyperloop case will be discussed briefly. In general, it is shown that resonance effects are also worth to be studied for freight and passenger trains with lower speeds.
Train-induced ground vibrations - the emission and transmission from tunnel and surface lines
(2023)
Train-induced ground vibrations are quite different for tunnel and surface lines. The excitation of the track and ground vibration by the vehicle-track-soil interaction maybe influenced by the stiffer track support of the tunnel invert. The excited waves are propagating on a different path compared to the surface line. The wave propagation in the interior of the soil is calculated by a wavenumber integral in a similar way as the propagation along the surface and a general reduction of < 0.5 has been found. An additional reduction has been found because of the missing Rayleigh wave. The different excitation of tunnel lines is analysed theoretically by the combined finite-element boundary-element method and some results about the influencing tunnel and soil parameters will be shown. Measurements have been made at the Mühlberg-Tunnel in Germany. The vibrations of the train, the track and the soil have been measured simultaneously at the tunnel and a nearby surface line. Spectra will be shown for different train speeds between 60 and 160 km/h. A clear reduction effect for the tunnel line compared to the surface line has been observed in a specific (train-speed-dependent) frequency range. This agrees well with the observations of other research institutes. The mid-frequency tunnel-surface reduction seems to be a consequence of the stiffer track structure which leads to a wider distribution of the axle loads. Therefore, the axle impulses due to the train passage are longer and have a lower frequency content. This will have an effect on the ground vibrations at some distance which are present in case of an irregular transmission path through a ballast and soil with varying stiffness. A similar reduction effect can also be found for other track forms where the axle impulses are distributed on a longer track segment, for example slab tracks, tracks with under ballast plates, under ballast mats or under sleeper pads.
Die VDI Richtlinie 3837 enthält detaillierte Angaben zur Erschütterungsemission. Die DIN 45672-3 enthält nur den Tunnel- oder einen Bodenmesspunkt als Ausgangspunkt der Prognose. Die Erschütterungsanregung durch die Fahrzeug-Fahrweg-Wechselwirkung wird beschrieben. Die ERgebnisse der BAM stimmen sehr gut mit dem Prognosekonzept von Highspeed 2 überein. Dies wird an den Punkten 1. Störgrößen, 2. Achsimpulse, 3. Tunnelstrecken aufgezeigt.
Ground vibrations near railway lines are generated by the forces that are acting between wheel and rail. It seems to be a straight forward assumption that the vehicle dynamics are important for the level and the frequencies of the excitation forces. Different vehicle dynamics phenomena are analysed for their role in the excitation of ground vibrations: rigid body modes of the bogies, elastic (bending) modes of the car body, and elastic modes of the wheelset. The theoretical analyses use rigid body models, simplified elastic models, and detailed elastic models. Some of these problems are vehicle–track interaction problems where 3D finite‑element boundary‑element models have been used for the track and soil. It is shown that the rigid or flexible vehicle modes are well in the frequency range of ground vibrations (4 to 100 Hz). They have an influence on the excitation force but the additional forces are rather small and can be neglected in ground vibration prediction. The theoretical results are checked by experimental results of a simultaneous measurement of vehicle,
track, and ground vibrations.
A prediction software has been developed by BAM. The following topics have still be solved. A realistic irregularity spectrum can be derived from axle-box measurements. It agrees wel with the spectrum used for the high-speed 2 project in the United Kingdom. In addition, the scattering of axle pulses should be included. This mid-frequency component can also be found in the HS2 procedure. Finally, the reduction in case of a tunnel line compared to a surface line should be included. Some measurement results of BAM, HS2 and other institutes show a certain mid-frequency reduction. This is due to the load distribution of the tunnel which yields softer axle pulses and the scattered axle impulses are reduced.
The contribution shows measurement examples of cars, floors, foundations, railway tracks, a footbridge, and a railbridge. Vibrations may include modes and waves. Namely in soil-structure interaction, modes are damped, shifted and prevented so that alternatives for the modal analysis are necessary: The approximation of the whole spectrum (flexibility function) and of the whole train passage (moving-load response).
Die Prognose und Minderung von Bahnerschütterungen haben eine lange Tradition in der Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung. Im Jahr 2006 wurde eine Prognose-Software fertiggestellt, die viele Forschungs- und Messergebnisse zusammenfasst. Sie umfasst die Teilbereiche Emission (die Anregung durch die Fahrzeug-Fahrweg-Untergrund-Wechselwirkung), die Transmission (die Ausbreitung durch den Boden) und die Immission (die Übertragung vom Freifeld in ein Gebäude). Die Prognose geschieht in allen Teilen mit einfachen Formeln, die veröffentlicht sind und zur Anwendung für Jedermann zur Verfügung stehen. Es werden Beispiele zur Emission und zur Transmission gezeigt.
Im Bereich Transmissionsprognose werden zu den Anregungskräften (aus dem Emissionsteil) die Bodenerschütterungen als Schwinggeschwindigkeitsterzspektren berechnet. Das Ergebnis hängt stark von der Bodensteifigkeit, -dämpfung und -schichtung ab. Dies wurde später mit einer Messkampagne in der Schweiz an 10 Messorten bestätigt (Bild 1). Die Berechnung erfolgt näherungsweise für einen geschichteten Boden mit einer frequenzabhängigen Wellengeschwindigkeit (Dispersion) oder einem tiefenabhängigen Wellengeschwindigkeitsprofil.
Die Anregungskräfte werden im Prognosebereich Emission mit einem 2-dimensionalen Gleismodell berechnet (Bild 2). 1-dimensionale Modelle liefern meist falsche Ergebnisse und 3-dimensionale Modelle (zum Beispiel mit der kombinierten Finite-Element-Randelement-Methode) sind für eine Erschütterungs¬prognose sicherlich zu aufwändig. Das 2-dimensionale Modell wurde an 3-dimensionale Ergebnisse so angepasst, dass die Ergebnisse für viele Gleise und Böden annähernd zutreffen. Auch Minderungs¬maßnahmen am Gleis können mit diesem Modell sehr gut berechnet werden.
Die Prognoseverfahren wurden in den folgenden Jahren weiter verfeinert. Es wurde die quasi-statische Anregung durch die bewegten statischen Zuglasten mit einer Näherungsformel ergänzt, so dass auch das tieffrequente Nahfeld realistisch erfasst werden kann. Mit der Berücksichtigung der Achsfolge (insbesondere zwischen den Achsen im Drehgestell) ergeben sich zwei typische Minima in den Erschütterungsspektren, die oft auch in den Messungen beobachtet werden. Der Amplitudenanteil zwischen diesen beiden Minima ist oft stärker angehoben, so dass hier eine zusätzliche Erschütterungsanregung vermutet wird. Dieser Anteil kann rein empirisch prognostiziert werden, so wie das in den englischen Prognosen (zuletzt für das Highspeed2-Projekt) enthalten ist. Die Begründung dieses Anteils ist allerdings nicht die Achsfolge, sondern die Zerstreuung der statischen Achslastimpulse durch einen unregelmäßigen Gleisuntergrund und Boden.
Die messtechnische Ermittlung eines Minderungseffektes ist komplizierter als allgemein angenommen. Es reicht nicht aus, jeweils an einem Messpunkt in der Nähe eines Gleises mit und ohne Minderungs¬maßnahme die Erschütterungen zu messen und aus dem Verhältnis der Amplituden (beziehungsweise aus der Differenz der Pegel) „die Einfügedämmung“ zu ermitteln. Es wird an Beispielen gezeigt, wie man hier sinnvoller vorgehen kann.
1. Zunächst ist es wichtig, nicht nur die Einfügedämmung sondern auch die Originalspektren mit und ohne Minderung zu dokumentieren und zu veröffentlichen, damit man kontrollieren kann, ob wesentliche Amplituden und Frequenzbereiche reduziert sind oder ob es sich um eher zufällige Minderungen oder Verstärkungen handelt. (Beispiel Unterschottermatte/Raron, Müller/SBB)
2. Der Messpunkt sollte nicht im Nahbereich des Gleises liegen, da ansonsten eine zu günstige, falsche Einfügedämmung bestimmt wird. (Beispiel Tunnel/ Leipzig/Breitsamter)
3. Um Zufälligkeiten zu vermeiden, sollte man an mehr als einem Punkt messen. (Beispiel Unterschotterplatte/Altheim/Auersch)
4. Man sollte eigentlich immer auch die Bodenkennwerte (Steifigkeit, Dämpfung, Amplituden-abnahme, Übertagungsfunktion) messen. Selbst bei nahegelegene Messquerschnitten kann man Überraschungen erleben. (Beispiel erste ICE-Messungen/bei Würzburg/Auersch)
5. Bei verschiedenen Bodenkennwerten kann man eine Korrektur durchführen. (Beispiel Gleis-tröge/Mistler) Am besten bestimmt man ein äquivalentes Kraftspektrum zu jedem Messort und jedem Messzug (Beispiel Feste Fahrbahn/Gardelegen/Auersch)
6. Prinzipiell gibt es nicht die Einfügedämmung einer Maßnahme. Die Einfügedämmung ist immer boden- und referenzsystemabhängig. Die „beste“ Einfügungsdämmung erhält man mit einem steifen Untergrund (Beispiel Unterschottermatte/Tunnel/München Gasteig/Wettschureck) Das heißt aber nicht, dass die Maßnahme durch einen künstlich versteiften Untergrund besser wird (Beispiel Unterschottermatten/RRT2006/Auersch)
Es werden Messbeispiele gezeigt, die alle neben einer hochfrequenten dynamischen Minderung auch eine mittelfrequente quasi-statische Minderung aufweisen. Dabei wird der mittelfrequente Zerstreuanteil der statischen Achslastimpulse durch die breitere Lastverteilung und damit die Impulsdehnung der Achslastimpulse reduziert. Diese Impulsdehnung lässt sich mit dem 2-dimensionalen Gleismodell berechnen. Die Minderungswirkung hängt aber wiederum vom Referenzsystem und dessen unregel¬mäßiger Steifigkeitsverteilung ab. Je unregelmäßiger der Boden und Gleisuntergrund des Referenz¬systems, desto stärker ist die Minderungswirkung.
Die Prognose und Minderung von Bahnerschütterungen haben eine lange Tradition in der Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung. Im Jahr 2006 wurde eine Prognose-Software fertiggestellt, die viele Forschungs- und Messergebnisse zusammenfasst. Sie umfasst die Teilbereiche Emission (die Anregung durch die Fahrzeug-Fahrweg-Untergrund-Wechselwirkung), die Transmission (die Ausbreitung durch den Boden) und die Immission (die Übertragung vom Freifeld in ein Gebäude). Die Prognose geschieht in allen Teilen mit einfachen Formeln, die veröffentlicht sind und zur Anwendung für Jedermann zur Verfügung stehen. Es werden Beispiele zur Emission und zur Transmission gezeigt. Im Bereich Transmissionsprognose werden zu den Anregungskräften (aus dem Emissionsteil) die Bodenerschütterungen als Schwinggeschwindigkeitsterzspektren berechnet. Das Ergebnis hängt stark von der Bodensteifigkeit, -dämpfung und -schichtung ab. Dies wurde später mit einer Messkampagne in der Schweiz an 10 Messorten bestätigt. Die Berechnung erfolgt näherungsweise für einen geschichteten Boden mit einer frequenzabhängigen Wellengeschwindigkeit (Dispersion) oder einem tiefenabhängigen Wellengeschwindigkeitsprofil. Die Anregungskräfte werden im Prognosebereich Emission mit einem 2-dimensionalen Gleismodell berechnet. 1-dimensionale Modelle liefern meist falsche Ergebnisse und 3-dimensionale Modelle (zum Beispiel mit der kombinierten Finite-Element-Randelement-Methode) sind für eine Erschütterungs¬prognose sicherlich zu aufwändig. Das 2-dimensionale Modell wurde an 3-dimensionale Ergebnisse so angepasst, dass die Ergebnisse für viele Gleise und Böden annähernd zutreffen. Auch Minderungs¬maßnahmen am Gleis können mit diesem Modell sehr gut berechnet werden. Die Prognoseverfahren wurden in den folgenden Jahren weiter verfeinert. Es wurde die quasi-statische Anregung durch die bewegten statischen Zuglasten mit einer Näherungsformel ergänzt, so dass auch das tieffrequente Nahfeld realistisch erfasst werden kann. Mit der Berücksichtigung der Achsfolge (insbesondere zwischen den Achsen im Drehgestell) ergeben sich zwei typische Minima in den Erschütterungsspektren, die oft auch in den Messungen beobachtet werden. Der Amplitudenanteil zwischen diesen beiden Minima ist oft stärker angehoben, so dass hier eine zusätzliche Erschütterungsanregung vermutet wird. Dieser Anteil kann rein empirisch prognostiziert werden, so wie das in den englischen Prognosen (zuletzt für das Highspeed2-Projekt) enthalten ist. Die Begründung dieses Anteils ist allerdings nicht die Achsfolge, sondern die Zerstreuung der statischen Achslastimpulse durch einen unregelmäßigen Gleisuntergrund und Boden. Die messtechnische Ermittlung eines Minderungseffektes ist komplizierter als allgemein angenommen. Es reicht nicht aus, jeweils an einem Messpunkt in der Nähe eines Gleises mit und ohne Minderungsmaßnahme die Erschütterungen zu messen und aus dem Verhältnis der Amplituden (beziehungsweise aus der Differenz der Pegel) „die Einfügedämmung“ zu ermitteln. Es wird an Beispielen gezeigt, wie man hier sinnvoller vorgehen kann. 1. Zunächst ist es wichtig, nicht nur die Einfügedämmung sondern auch die Originalspektren mit und ohne Minderung zu dokumentieren und zu veröffentlichen, damit man kontrollieren kann, ob wesentliche Amplituden und Frequenzbereiche reduziert sind oder ob es sich um eher zufällige Minderungen oder Verstärkungen handelt. (Beispiel Unterschottermatte/Raron, Müller/SBB) 2. Der Messpunkt sollte nicht im Nahbereich des Gleises liegen, da ansonsten eine zu günstige, falsche Einfügedämmung bestimmt wird. (Beispiel Tunnel/ Leipzig/Breitsamter) 3. Um Zufälligkeiten zu vermeiden, sollte man an mehr als einem Punkt messen. (Beispiel Unterschotterplatte/Altheim/Auersch) 4. Man sollte eigentlich immer auch die Bodenkennwerte (Steifigkeit, Dämpfung, Amplituden-abnahme, Übertagungsfunktion) messen. Selbst bei nahegelegene Messquerschnitten kann man Überraschungen erleben. (Beispiel erste ICE-Messungen/bei Würzburg/Auersch) 5. Bei verschiedenen Bodenkennwerten kann man eine Korrektur durchführen. (Beispiel Gleis-tröge/Mistler) Am besten bestimmt man ein äquivalentes Kraftspektrum zu jedem Messort und jedem Messzug (Beispiel Feste Fahrbahn/Gardelegen/Auersch) 6. Prinzipiell gibt es nicht die Einfügedämmung einer Maßnahme. Die Einfügedämmung ist immer boden- und referenzsystemabhängig. Die „beste“ Einfügungsdämmung erhält man mit einem steifen Untergrund (Beispiel Unterschottermatte/Tunnel/München Gasteig/Wettschureck) Das heißt aber nicht, dass die Maßnahme durch einen künstlich versteiften Untergrund besser wird (Beispiel Unterschottermatten/RRT2006/Auersch) Es werden Messbeispiele gezeigt, die alle neben einer hochfrequenten dynamischen Minderung auch eine mittelfrequente quasi-statische Minderung aufweisen. Dabei wird der mittelfrequente Zerstreuanteil der statischen Achslastimpulse durch die breitere Lastverteilung und damit die Impulsdehnung der Achslastimpulse reduziert. Diese Impulsdehnung lässt sich mit dem 2-dimensionalen Gleismodell berechnen. Die Minderungswirkung hängt aber wiederum vom Referenzsystem und dessen unregelmäßiger Steifigkeitsverteilung ab. Je unregelmäßiger der Boden und Gleisuntergrund des Referenzsystems, desto stärker ist die Minderungswirkung.
The Federal Institute of Material Research and Testing has performed many impact tests from very small laboratory tests to very big “free-field” tests with heavy containers on stiff foundations. The first measurements have been done on a big foundation where it should be guaranteed that the foundation is rigid and the container is tested properly. Later on, a smaller drop test facility has been built on the ground inside an existing building. It had to be controlled by prediction and measurements that the drop test will not damage the building. Tests from different heights on soft, medium, and stiff targets have been done to find out rules which allow to identify acceptable and unacceptable drop tests. Later on, the biggest drop test facility has been built for masses up to 200 t. It was necessary for the design of the foundation to estimate the forces which oc-cur during the drop tests. In addititon, the acceptable tests should be selected and controlled by measurements where the impact duration is important. Dif-ferent sensors, accelerometers, accelerometers with mechanical filters, geo-phones (velocity transducers), strain gauges, and pressure cells have been ap-plied for these tasks. Signal transformations and model calculations have been used to check and understand the dynamic measurements. The simplest law is the conservation of the momentum which is a good approximation if the impact is short. If the soil under the foundation has an influence on the deceleration of the container, the maximum foundation velocity is lower than the simple esti-mation.
The Federal Institute of Material Research and Testing has performed many impact tests from very small laboratory tests to very big “free-field” tests with heavy containers on stiff foundations. The first measurements have been done on a big foundation where it should be guaranteed that the foundation is rigid and the container is tested properly. Later on, a smaller drop test facility has been built on the ground inside an existing building. It had to be controlled by prediction and measurements that the drop test will not damage the building. Tests from different heights on soft, medium, and stiff targets have been done to find out rules which allow to identify acceptable and unacceptable drop tests. Later on, the biggest drop test facility has been built for masses up to 200 t. It was necessary for the design of the foundation to estimate the forces which oc-cur during the drop tests. In addititon, the acceptable tests should be selected and controlled by measurements where the impact duration is important. Dif-ferent sensors, accelerometers, accelerometers with mechanical filters, geo-phones (velocity transducers), strain gauges, and pressure cells have been ap-plied for these tasks. Signal transformations and model calculations have been used to check and understand the dynamic measurements. The simplest law is the conservation of the momentum which is a good approximation if the impact is short. If the soil under the foundation has an influence on the deceleration of the container, the maximum foundation velocity is lower than the simple esti-mation.
This contribution presents experimental methods to detect track damage. At BAM (Federal Institute of Material Research and Testing), a measuring car with a measuring system of 72 channels, geophones, mountings, cables, harmonic and impulsive exciters is used for dynamic measurements of the track, the soil and buildings. An instrumented hammer allows force measurements and to evaluate transfer functions of the track, and the soil. Wave measurements are used to identify the soil characteristics. Train passages are measured at the track and for the train induced ground vibrations. In addition to these in situ options, tests of tracks or track elements can be performed in a large laboratory.
Measured train passages and hammer impacts in combination with track-soil calculation have been successfully used for the detection of damaged slab tracks. This approach is now extended to intact slab and ballast tracks. The vibrations of many tracks have been measured at several levels from rail, sleeper, track plate, base plate, base layer to the subsoil by velocity or acceleration sensors. The time histories have to be integrated once or twice to get the displacements. The displacement signals include an arbitrary time-dependent shift which must be eliminated or respected in the interpretation. On the other hand, the calculation of slab and ballast tracks have been done in frequency-wavenumber domain. The displacements along the track and the frequency-dependent compliance transfer functions can be calculated. The latter can be compared with the results of the hammer impacts on the track. The deformation of the track can be transformed to time histories for a whole train and compared to the measured train passages. Many slab (and ballast) tracks have been measured at different sites. The displacements of the tracks are presented, and the following parameters have been analysed in the measurement results: slab track vs. ballast track, different types of slab tracks, damaged slab tracks, different trains, switches at different measuring points, an elastic layer, the mortar layer, different soils at different places. The soil should have the dominant influence on the track-plate displacements. Slab and ballast track yield also big differences in maximum displacement and width of deformation. Some of the preceding aspects will be analysed in comparison of measurement and theory.
Vibration measurements have many causes and many technical and natural sources. Problems can sometimes be solved by short-term measurements, but in many cases, a long-term measurement is necessary. In long-term measurements of days, weeks, months and even years, it is easy to collect a huge quantity of raw data, but at the end, the post-processing of these data can be exhausting (for example one-year vibration data of a wind energy tower). A software has been developed which con-sists of measuring and evaluation routines where the measuring routines can operate different meas-uring systems and different measuring cards. The main advantage of this software is the fact that the interesting evaluations can be integrated in the measuring process so that the characteristics of the vibration can be extracted without storing all the raw data. Only important time segments are stored, for example train passages. The overall concept of the software and the main evaluation routines will be described in some details. Examples of our measurement experience will illustrate the capabilities of the software. 1) Surveying construction work in nearby sensitive buildings (for example an old wind tunnel), including a stable alarm system and meaningful vibration limits. 2) Prediction of train-induced vibration for a planned building to prevent annoyance and to improve the building design. 3) Modal analysis and long term measurements of several single- or multi-span, concrete or steel bridges 4) Modal and wave analysis of coupled floors in a historical building (“Neues Palais” at Potsdam). 5) Soil properties of various measurement sites (different routines to evaluate the dispersion). Moreover, from many projects, amplitudes, frequencies, and attenuation laws have been collected and analysed for the different sources such as vibratory or impact pile driving and ground compaction, demolition work with different machines, blasting in quarries and in tunnel works, bomb and mine clearing.
The train passages over intact or damaged slab tracks on different soils have been calculated by two methods. The finite element method (FEM) uses a Winkler soil under the track model by adding a thin “soil layer”. The combined finite element boundary element method has a continuous soil model which is included by the boundary element method. The basic results are the distributions of the track (rail, track plate, and base layer) displacements along the track for a single axle laod. These solutions are superposed to a complete train load and transformed to time histories. The influence of track and soil parameters has been analysed. The main interest is the influence of the track damage. A gap between track plate and base layer of different lengths has been studied for changes in amplitudes and widths of deflection. A best fit to measured track displacements has been found so that the track damage can be identified and quantified. The FEM model with Winkler soil cannot be fitted to the amplitude and width with the same soil parameters. Therefore, the FEBEM model is preferable for these railway track problems.
A study on building vibrations has been performed by finite element calculations. Family houses, multi-storey residential buildings, office buildings and office towers have been modelled in detail. The frequency-dependent response due to a free-field excitation has been evaluated for walls, columns and floors. The ratio of building amplitudes to free-field amplitudes starts with uB/u0 = 1 at zero frequency and is usually lower than 1 at 50 Hz, the end of the frequency range considered here. In between, amplifications occur due to several reasons. There are „soil resonances“ where the whole building is vibrating on the compliant soil, “column resonances” where the upper storeys are vibrating on the compliant columns, and the “floor resonances” where the floors are vibrating excited by their supports. Results are presented for all building types, but a special focus is set on office buildings. A parameter study shows the influence of the stiffness of the soil, the number of storeys, and the width of the building. It has been found that the “soil resonance” is strongly modified by the low-frequency floor resonances for the normal office building. The main resonance of a twenty-storey office tower is determined equally by the “soil mode” and the “column mode”. It is an important observation for these office buildings that the resonances can differ for different parts of the building such as the centre, the edge, the corner, and the core of the building. This leads to non-uniform vibration modes across the building, which look like another type of “floor resonance” and which have been observed in several real building projects. Experimental results will be shown which can confirm the calculated phenomena.