6 Materialchemie
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (7)
- Forschungsbericht (4)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (2)
- Sonstiges (2)
- Posterpräsentation (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (16)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (16) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- XPS (4)
- Biofilms (3)
- 3D nano SIMS (2)
- EU FP7 project NanoValid (2)
- Inter-laboratory comparison (2)
- Metrology (2)
- Raman-spectroscopy (2)
- Silica nanoparticles (2)
- Surface chemical analysis (2)
- AEROSIL® OX50 (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (7)
Biofouling constitutes a major challenge in the application of biosensors and biomedical implants, as well as for (food) packaging and marine equipment. In this work, an antifouling surface coating based on the combination of mussel-inspired dendritic polyglycerol (MI-dPG) and an amine-functionalized block copolymer of linear polyglycerol (lPG−b−OA11, OA = oligo-amine) was developed. The coating was compared to a MI-dPG surface which was postfunctionalized with commercially available amine-terminated Polyethylene glycol (HO−PEG−NH2) of similar molecular weight. In the current work, These coatings were compared in their chemical stability, protein fouling characteristics, and cell fouling characteristics. The lPG−b−OA11-functionalized coating showed high chemical stability in both phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solutions and reduced the adhesion of fibrinogen from human plasma with 99% and the adhesion of human serum albumin with 96%, in comparison to the bare titanium dioxide substrate. Furthermore, the Proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) was reduced with 85% when the lPG−b−OA11 system was compared to bare titanium dioxide. Additionally, a reduction of 94% was observed when the lPG−b−OA11 system was compared to tissue culture polystyrene.
This talk was given within the scope of the SIMS-22 conference in October 2019 in Kyoto (Japan). It deals with the surface analytical investigation of nanoparticles by PCS-assisted ToF-SIMS. This technique is applicable to core-shell nanoparticles, in order to distinguish a complete encapsulation from an incomplete encapsulation of the core by the shell material. Furthermore, the depletion process of organic nanoparticle coatings caused by UV-weathering is investigated. Finally, the significance of grouping studies for nanomaterials research and risk assessment is demonstrated.
An inter-laboratory comparison on the surface charge, expressed as zeta potential ζ, of nanoscaled SiO2 has been performed using #14 BAM Silica (see D.5.41/5.42) nanoparticles. The comparability of results delivered by participants has been tested.
The Task 5.4 of NanoValid is designed to test, compare and validate current methods to measure and characterize physicochemical properties of selected engineered nanoparticles. The measurand is Surface charge expressed as zeta-Potential. The measurements are to be accompanied by estimates of the uncertainties at a confidence level of 95%, deduced from the standard uncertainties. Therefore an uncertainty budget comprising statistical (Type A) and systematic (Type B) errors has to be established and delivered for the measurand. The protocol comprises two Annexes addressing the establishment of uncertainty budgets following GUM. The final goal of the comparison is to identify those methods of measurement which have potential as reference methods in pc characterization of nanoparticles for the determination of a given measurand.
This Report describes an inter-laboratory comparison aiming on the establishment of the used method (BET) as a reference method. Another purpose was the certification of the porous reference material #15 BAM Titania as CRM BAM-P110 (cf. D 5.41/42). The certified values determined by nitrogen ad-sorption at 77.3 K according to the international standards ISO 15901-2 and ISO 9277 are summarized in the Table below.
An inter-laboratory comparison on the particle size, expressed as mean diameter d, of nanoscaled SiO2 (#14 BAM Silica (see NanoValid DoW, D.5.41/5.42)) has been performed. The majority of participants used Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS). A few used Electron Microscopy as method. Following methods had been applied by only one partner, respectively: Small Angle X-ray Scattering, Analytical Ultracentrifugation, Atomic Force Microscopy and Atomizer with electric mobility spectrometer.
This report describes a standard operation procedure for dispersion of nanomaterials in liquids prior to toxicological or ecotoxicological testing. Main factors, who determine the state of agglomeration and aggregation of ENMs after dispersion are specific energy input, particle concentration and fluid composition. The method was validated in two round robin tests, where two typical nanomaterials (a nanopowder and a nanodispersion) were investigated. One main result arising out of the data comparison was that only those participants, who were able to follow the instructions in the SOPs completely, received similar results regarding particle size and zeta potential. The SOP is easy to adapt for other types of nanomaterials. The results provide the standardization process and were presented at DIN working group.
The SAWG was established as an ad-hoc working group in 2003 before being established as a permanent working group. The first comparison was in 2007. Dr Unger recalled the terms of reference for the group, which paralleled those of the CCQM itself, with a focus on spatially resolved chemical surface analysis at the micro- and nano-scale. The group also had a remit to act as a forum for exchange of information on research and development of surface analysis, establish contact with relevant stakeholders and promote the development of SI traceable chemical surface measurements. The group currently had participants from 18 institutes, although five had not sent participants to recent meetings.
Reporting progress on studies, Dr Unger said that P-190CCQM-K-157 (measurement of HfO2 in thin film) had been completed, and the subsequent K-157 approved is ongoing and that for CCQM-K153 (Measurement of Specific Adsorption of N2 and Kr on nonporous SiO2 at liquid nitrogen temperature by BET) was at the draft B was completed stageand distributed to CCQM WG chairpersons for approval.
Dr Unger reported that CCQM-K-153 had covered measurement of specific absorption of nitrogen or krypton on nonporous silica at liquid nitrogen [ambient] temperature. This included an application of the BET method, a standard method for determination of surface area. This fitted into the ‘nonporous’ region of the SAWG measurement space, which included microporous, mesoporous and microporous regions. Of these regions, CCQM-K136 and CCQM-K153 demonstrated capability in meso- and microporous media respectively. CCQM-K153 involved two measurands; amount of absorbed gas at liquid nitrogen temperature, expressed as specific absorption, and the BET surface area. Specific absorption could in principle be traceable to the SI; BET was operationally defined. Five institutes participated. A detailed uncertainty budget was available for both measurands. Results had been excellent, with all laboratories agreeing well within their uncertainties and all in agreement with the reference value.
Reporting on CCQM P190, Dr Unger described the study objective measurand (amount of substance of HfO2 in a thin film), samples and methods. After showing transmission electron microscope images obtained in the study, he briefly reviewed the conclusions. The study identified a need to handle carbon contamination, harmonise the XPS measurement protocol, determine emission angle and identify a consensus value for attenuation length. These conclusions had informed the design of the proposed ongoing K157 study approved at the 24th Meeting of te CCQM.
The group planned a number of comparisons for the next three years:
2019: A pilot study on the amount of substance in a thin organic layer (previously approved).
2020: CCQMK-157, Measurement of the amount of substance of HfO2; A Key comparison on specific gas adsorption on microporous samples and a Pilot study on Homogeneous surface composition of an ionic liquid.
2021: A key comparison measuring the amount of substance in a thin organic layer.
Dr Unger additionally described a recently proposed pilot study to examine chemical composition in a deep nanoscale layer. This was important for the electronics industry. Four participants had expressed interest. The measurand will be the amount of Ir(ppy)2(acac) in a thin organic layer within an organic layer stack on a silicon substrate. He also reported that SAWG had started work on characterisation of graphene material grown by chemical vapour decomposition (CVD). The work would examine coverage on the substrate, number of layers, level of disorder, uncertainty budgets associated with the measurement, and data analysis. A link to VAMAS Technical Work Area 41 “Graphene and Related 2D Materials“ would also be established.
Looking forward, Dr Unger said the group had established a task group on application of Raman spectroscopy. This had important applications but was currently seen as qualitative. He presented the terms of reference for the task group for approval by the CCQM.
Dr Unger reviewed the SAWG activities that have progressed the state of the art in measurement science. He listed the past and ongoing comparisons that had addressed new and challenging measurement problems, and drew attention to a number of key publications in surface analysis. He additionally described stakeholder engagement activities, including collaboration with VAMAS, input to ISO TC 201, contributions to Euramet projects, and contributions to two recent stakeholder workshops.
The proposed ISO Technical Report provides a description of a variety of physical methods of analytical chemistry by which bacteria and biofilms can be analysed. The state of the art, sample requirements and strengths associated with each method are identified. Presented at the DIN-meeting for NA 062-08-16 AA „Chemische Oberflächenanalyse und Rastersondenmikroskopie“
Graphene is a two-dimensional carbon network with unique properties. However, its low solubility, poor reactivity and the limited accessibility of a well-defined basal plane are major challenges for applications. An ideal method to overcome these problems is the covalent attachment of functional molecules to its surface which enable further reactive modifications for specific applications. There are several technologies for surface functionalization of graphene and related CNT materials. To get control on the functionalization process and to optimize the performance of the modified surfaces analytical tools for surface chemical characterization are required. X-ray absorption (NEXAFS) and photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) have been identified to be rather powerful here [1-3]. Specifically, NEXAFS spectroscopy underpinned by quantum chemical spectrum simulations [4] is unique in a way to address changes of aromaticity and defect formation at the graphene surface during functionalization.
For relevant surface modification technologies, we present examples on how NEXAFS and XPS can do a good job. All presented modifications aim on the production of platforms for defined functional 2D nanomaterials, as for example multifunctional hybrid architectures. In detail, we investigated:
• A wet chemical method for covalent functionalization of graphene sheets by a one-pot nitrene [2+1] cycloaddition reaction under mild conditions. Here a reaction between 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine and sodium azide with thermally reduced graphene oxide (TRGO) results in defined dichlorotriazine-functionalized graphene sheets.
• Graphene and carbon nanotube functionalized by Vacuum-Ultraviolet (VUV) induced photochemical or r.f. cw low pressure plasma processes to introduce amino, hydroxy or brominated functionalities.
To underpin finger-print information delivered by C K-edge NEXAFS we studied the effects of selected point and line defects as well as chemical modifications for a single graphene layer model by density functional theory based spectrum simulations.
References
[1] P.-L. Girard-Lauriault et al., Appl. Surf. Sci., 258 2012 8448-8454, DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.03.012
[2] A. Lippitz et al., Surf. Sci., 611 2013 L1-L7, DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2013.01.020
[3] A. Faghani et al., Angew. Chemie (International ed.), 56 2017 2675-2679, DOI:10.1002/anie.201612422
[4] C. Ehlert, et al., Phys.Chem.Chem.Phys., 16 2014 14083-14095, DOI: 10.1039/c4cp01106f
In this talk sample prep/handling, instrument calibration and data acquisition methods with examples from XPS, Auger and SIMS will be addressed in terms of their contributions to the reproducibility of data delivered by the methods.
Active parties in the field are VAMAS TWA 2 “Surface chemical analysis” (http://www.vamas.org/twa2/index.html), ISO/TC 201 “Surface chemical analysis” (https://www.iso.org/committee/54618.html) and the Surface Analysis Working Group (SAWG) at the International Meter Convention (https://www.bipm.org/en/ committees/cc/wg/sawg.html). The tools to improve the reproducibility of spectra, depth profiles and images at these international platforms are inter-laboratory comparisons, validated SOPs, standards and certified reference materials (CRM) as well as uncertainty budgets and establishment of traceability chains. The last point is of specific importance because all the methods, XPS, Auger and SIMS, are not primary methods.
To address quantitative XPS, AES and SIMS results of relevant inter-laboratory comparisons organized by SAWG considering measurands as alloy surface composition and thickness of thin films will be introduced. These comparisons delivered results which are viewed to be benchmarking, some of them resulted in ISO/TC 201 standards. For quantitative XPS and AES the principal outline of an uncertainty budget will be discussed together with the audience. Another issue of quantitative XPS which definitely needs consideration are valid methods for a determination of the transmission function of the instruments and even for the emission angle in the respective experiments.
Concerning the field of depth profiling it has to be investigated together with the audience whether the ISO (or ASTM) standards we have are sufficient to guarantee comparable results. Having in mind the number of different sputter ion species available today and range of samples of interest (metals, semiconductors, organic films) this might be questionable. And, how do depth profiling by AR-XPS and variable excitation energy XPS compete here?
For imaging surface chemical analysis, the characterization of the imaging system is an issue to be investigated. Here the determination of lateral resolution is a relevant topic.
Finally, the future needs to develop metrology for new applications e.g., ambient-pressure XPS, bio samples, and core-shell nanoparticles, will be issues raised for a discussion with the audience.