2.2 Prozesssimulation
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (32)
- Deutsch (22)
- Mehrsprachig (2)
Schlagworte
- CLP (8)
- Einstufung (7)
- GHS (6)
- Anerkennungen (5)
- Festlegungen (5)
- Prüfmethoden (5)
- Richtlinien (5)
- Zulassungen (5)
- Dangerous Goods (4)
- Fireball (4)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 2 Prozess- und Anlagensicherheit (56)
- 2.2 Prozesssimulation (56)
- 2.1 Sicherheit von Energieträgern (8)
- 3 Gefahrgutumschließungen; Energiespeicher (8)
- 2.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (5)
- 8 Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (5)
- 8.1 Sensorik, mess- und prüftechnische Verfahren (5)
- 3.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (4)
- 4 Material und Umwelt (4)
- 4.3 Schadstofftransfer und Umwelttechnologien (4)
- 3.1 Sicherheit von Gefahrgutverpackungen und Batterien (3)
- 2.3 Einstufung von Gefahrstoffen und -gütern (2)
- 7 Bauwerkssicherheit (2)
- 7.5 Technische Eigenschaften von Polymerwerkstoffen (2)
- 2.4 Prüfung und Bewertung von Explosivstoffen/Pyrotechnik (1)
- 3.2 Gefahrguttanks und Unfallmechanik (1)
- Z Zentrale Dienstleistungen (1)
- Z.1 Organisation, Controlling (1)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (30)
The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (UN-GHS) is being implemented in more and more countries all over the world; the EU has done so with the CLP-Regulation (EU-CLP). Compared to the undeniably important questions on health and environmental hazards, the classification of physical hazards of chemicals often has not been in the focus, although their implementation can be challenging and there are traps and pitfalls to be avoided. The following overview of the classification systematics for physical hazards aims at a principle understanding without detailing all criteria or test methods. Similarities and differences between the classification systems of the UN-GHS and EU-CLP, the transport of dangerous goods and the former EU system are reviewed with regard to the physical hazard classes. Available physical hazard classifications for the transport of dangerous goods and according to the former EU system can be used as available information when classifying according to the GHS. However, the interfaces of these classification systems and their limitations have to be understood well when concluding on GHS/CLP classifications. This applies not only to industry when applying CLP but especially to legislators when adapting legislation that in one way or another refers to the classification of chemicals.
One of the fundamental principles of the UN-GHS (Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals) is that all hazards of a chemical should be assigned and communicated. There is no general prioritization of hazards in the sense that certain hazard classes are not applicable if another one has been assigned. In contrast to health and environmental hazards, there are physical or chemical factors which preclude certain combinations of physical hazard classes. So far, there is no common understanding as to which combinations are relevant and which not. For example, should a pyrophoric liquid be classified as flammable liquid in addition, or is this redundant and unnecessary? In the course of the implementation of the GHS by countries or sectors and the actual application by industry all over the world, such questions become more and more important. For many of the combinations an unambiguous decision based on theGHS alone is not possible, thus confirming that the question which physical hazard classes might be assigned simultaneously to a chemical is not trivial. As one more milestone on the path to a globally harmonized system for the classification of hazardous chemicals, this should be discussed and ultimately solved on a global basis. It is the hope that this presentaion might serve as an impetus for such discussions.
Die „Empfehlungen über die Beförderung gefährlicher Güter, Handbuch über Prüfungen und Kriterien“ ergänzen die „ Empfehlungen über die Beförderung gefährlicher Güter, Modellvorschriften“ und das „Global harmonisierte System zur Einstufung und Kennzeichnung von Chemikalien (GHS)“. Sie enthalten Kriterien, Prüfmethoden und Verfahren, die für die Klassifizierung gefährlicher Güter gemäß den Vorschriften der Teile 2 und 3 der Modellvorschriften als auch von Chemikalien, von denen physikalische Gefahren nach dem GHS ausgehen, anzuwenden sind. Das Handbuch über Prüfungen und Kriterien, ursprünglich entwickelt vom „Economic and Social Council’s Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods“, welches eine erste Version im Jahre 1984 annahm, wurde regelmäßig aktualisiert und berichtigt. Gegenwärtig erfolgt die Aktualisierung unter Federführung des „Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods and on the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals“ (Sachverständigenausschuss), welches das ursprüngliche Gremium 2001 ersetzte. Die sechste überarbeitete Ausgabe enthält alle Änderungen zur fünften überarbeiteten Ausgabe, die vom Ausschuss während seiner fünften und sechsten Sitzungsperiode 2010 und 2012 angenommen wurden (veröffentlicht unter den Dokumentennummern ST/SG/AC.10/11/Rev.5/Amend.1 und ST/SG/AC.10/11/Rev.5/Amend.2), die während der siebenten Sitzungsperiode 2014 angenommenen Änderungen (ST/SG/AC.10/42/Add.2) sowie das Corrigendum zur 6. Ausgabe vom Februar 2016 (ST/SG/AC.10/11/Rev.6/Corr.1) und die während der achten Sitzungsperiode 2016 angenommenen Änderungen (ST/SG/AC.10/11/Rev.6/Amend.1) vom 9. Dezember 2016.
Die neuen Änderungen aus 2016 betreffen insbesondere:
- Änderungen des Prüfverfahrens für die Klassifizierung von Lithium-Metall und Lithium-Ionen-Batterien
- Änderung des Klassifizierungsverfahrens für ammoniumnitrathaltige Düngemittel
- Ein neuer Unterabschnitt für die Prüfungszusammenfassung für Lithiumzellen und -batterien
- Ein neuer Abschnitt für das Klassifizierungsverfahren und Kriterien in Bezug auf feste ammoniumnitrathaltige Düngemittel
- Änderung des Anhangs 7 für die Prüfung von Blitzknallsätzen
- Änderungen zur Unterstützung der Verwendung des UN-Prüfhandbuchs im Sinne des GHS
Final report of research activities at BAM concerning large scale fireballs of organic peroxides (OP). New models for OP fireball diameter, duration, height and Surface Emmissive Power (SEP) are proposed and discussed based on a large number of large-scale and small-scale experiments using Di-tert-butylperoxide (DTBP) as a liquid OP and heptane as a liquid hydrocarbon fuel. Finally, CFD simulations are used to predict the fireball parameters: diameter, duration, height and SEP. Also the impact on the German storage regulations for organic peroxides are discussed.
Transposition of regulations of the (German) employer’s liability insurance association (BGV’n) into Federal responsibility.
Fundamentals are regulated in the German Hazardous Substances Ordinance (GefStoffV). Prospectively, some definitions and more details are specified in a Technical Rule (TRGS 741 „Organic Peroxides“). A second project outline was discussed in 2014; because of some formal objections concerning the process and, particularly, the membership in a project group, no progress et al. since 2014.
Nevertheless, the BGV B4 is still valid. Because of some new findings and new test results a revision and Supplementation of the table of assignments of OP to risk (storage) groups was required.
Summary of recent research activities at BAM concerning large scale fireballs of organic peroxides (OP). Videos of the tests performed in Nanjing, China, are presented. A new model for OP fireball diameter, duration, height and SEP is proposed based on all experiments. In addition, small scale test results using DTBP and heptane are presented. Finally, CFD simulation is used to predict the fireball parameters: diameter, duration and height.
Self-Accelerating Decomposition Temperature (SADT) is a safety characteristic for the transport of self-reactive substances and organic peroxides. Its determination is time-consuming and in dependence on the test method also material-consuming. As shown previously, DSC measurements, which can be carried out fast and with a few milligram of material, supply a good correlation with SADT for technical pure, liquid organic peroxides. The approach is now applied for solid organic peroxides. Besides, the parameters, which are involved in the correlation, are discussed and their effect on the result is weighted qualitatively. In addition it was shown, that the method is inapplicable in an easy manner for diluted organic peroxides and pure self-reactive substances.
In case of a vehicle fire, an installed LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) tank with a malfunctioning safety device poses severe hazards. To investigate the consequences in case of tank failure, we conducted 16 tests with toroidal shaped LPG vehicle tanks. Three tanks were used for a Hydraulic Burst Test under standard conditions. Another three tanks were equipped with a statutory safety device and were subjected to a gasoline pool fire. The safety device prevented tank failure, as intended. To generate a statistically valid dataset on tank failure, ten tanks without safety devices were exposed to a gasoline pool fire. Five tanks were filled to a level of 20 %; the re-maining five were filled to a level of 100 %. In order to gain information on the heating process, three tem-perature readings at the tank surface, and three nearby flame temperatures were recorded. At distances of l = (7; 9; 11) m to the tank, the overpressure of the shock wave induced by the tank failure and the unsteady tem-peratures were measured. All ten tanks failed within a time of t < 5 min in a BLEVE (boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion). Seven of these resulted directly in a catastrophic failure. The other three resulted in partial failure followed by catastrophic failure. A near field overpressure at a distance of l = 7 m of up to p = 0.27 bar was measured. All ten tests showed massive fragmentation of the tank mantle. In total, 50 fragments were found. These 50 fragments make-up 88.6 % of the original tank mass. Each fragment was georeferenced and weighed. Fragment throwing distances of l > 250 m occurred. For the tanks with a fill level of 20 %, the average number of fragments was twice as high as it was for the tanks that were filled completely.
Compressed natural gas (CNG) is a widely used automotive fuel in a variety of countries. In case of a vehicle fire where the safety device also malfunctions, a failure of the CNG automotive cylinder could occur. Such a cylinder failure is associated with severe hazards for the surrounding environment. Firstly, a comprehensive analysis is given below, summarizing various accidents involving CNG automotive cylinders and their consequences. In an extensive experimental program, 21 CNG automotive cylinders with no safety device were tested. Of the 21, burst tests were carried out on 5 Type III and 5 Type IV cylinders. Furthermore, fire tests with 8 Type III and 3 Type IV cylinders were conducted. Apart from cylinder pressure, inner temperature and cylinder mantle temperature, the periphery consequences, such as nearfield blast pressure and fragmentation are documented. The maximum measured overpressure due to a Type III cylinder failure was p = 0.41 bar. Each traceable fragment was georeferenced. All-in-all, fragment throw distances of d > 300 m could be observed. As one key result, it can be stated that the tested Type IV CNG cylinders showed less critical failure behavior then the Type III cylinders under fire impingement.