Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Enzymatische Alkoholyse (3)
- Altspeisefett (2)
- Kühlschmierstoffe (2)
- Transmission function (2)
- X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (2)
- Altfett (1)
- Cooling lubricants (1)
- Enzymatic alcoholysis (1)
- Esteröle (1)
- Fatty acid ethylhexylester (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Hintergrund und Ziel. Kühlschmierstoffe auf der Basis von Fettsäureestern bieten technologische Vorteile gegenüber mineralölbasierten Produkten. Außerdem sind sie umweltgerechter und leisten einen Beitrag zum nachhaltigen Wirtschaften. Dennoch werden sie in der Praxis kaum eingesetzt, da sie bisher aufgrund von Rohstoffpreisen und Synthesekosten teurer sind, als konventionelle Konkurrenzprodukte. Alternativen hinsichtlich Rohstoffen und Synthesewegen werden betrachtet und die Eigenschaftsbilder resultierender Esterprodukte miteinander verglichen.
Methoden. In die Untersuchungen wurden drei auf enzymatischkatalytischem Weg hergestellte Fettsäure-2-Ethylhexylester auf der Basis von Erdnussfett, Rindertalg und Altspeisefett sowie vier konventionell synthetisierte Ester aus Tier- bzw. Pflanzenfetten und 2-Ethyl-1-Hexanol einbezogen. Bestimmt wurden physikalische Eigenschaftswerte, Fettsäurespektren, Gehalte an freien Fettsäuren sowie Oxidations- und Hydrolysestabilitäten. Ferner wurden Thermolyseexperimente durchgeführt.
Ergebnisse. Die physikalischen Eigenschaften der sieben Ester, d.h. Dichte, Viskosität, Pourpoint und Flammpunkt, waren vergleichbar und ließen die Anwendbarkeit der Produkte als Basisöle für Kühlschmierstoffe erwarten. Hydrolysebeständigkeiten waren hoch und thermische Belastungen der Ester gaben keine Hinweise auf besondere Schadstoffbildungspotentiale. Defizite wiesen insbesondere die enzymatisch hergestellten Ester hinsichtlich Oxidationsstabilitäten und den Gehalten an freien Fettsäuren auf.
Ausblick. Für die Praxis wird es notwendig sein, Mindestqualitäten für Rohstoffe und resultierende Esteröle zu definieren, die als Grundöle im Kühlschmierstoffbereich eingesetzt werden sollen. Außerdem müssen Verfahren ausgearbeitet werden, die es ermöglichen, zu qualitativ hochwertigen Esterprodukten zu gelangen, ohne den Preisvorteil von Rohstoffen wie Altspeise- und Tierfetten durch hohe Produktions- und Veredelungskosten zu verlieren. Ein Beitrag hierzu ist sicherlich die Weiterentwicklung der wenig energieaufwändigen enzymatischen Alkoholyse zur Esterproduktion.
We report the results of a Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards interlaboratory study on the intensity scale calibration of x-ray photoelectron spectrometers using low-density polyethylene (LDPE) as an alternative material to gold, silver, and copper. An improved set of LDPE reference spectra, corrected for different instrument geometries using a quartz-monochromated Al Kα x-ray source, was developed using data provided by participants in this study. Using
these new reference spectra, a transmission function was calculated for each dataset that participants provided. When compared to a similar calibration procedure using the NPL reference spectra for gold, the LDPE intensity calibration method achieves an absolute offset of ∼3.0% and a systematic deviation of ±6.5% on average across all participants. For spectra recorded at high pass energies (≥90 eV), values of absolute offset and systematic deviation are ∼5.8% and ±5.7%, respectively, whereas for spectra collected at lower pass energies (<90 eV), values of absolute offset and systematic deviation are ∼4.9% and ±8.8%, respectively; low pass energy spectra perform worse than the global average, in terms of systematic deviations, due to diminished count rates and signal-to-noise ratio. Differences in absolute offset are attributed to the surface roughness of the LDPE induced by sample preparation. We further assess the usability of LDPE as a secondary reference material and comment on its performance in the presence of issues such as variable dark noise, x-ray warm up times, inaccuracy at low count rates, and underlying spectrometer problems. In response to participant feedback and the results of the study, we provide an updated LDPE intensity calibration protocol to address the issues highlighted in the interlaboratory study. We also comment on the lack of implementation of a consistent and traceable intensity calibration method across the community of x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) users and, therefore, propose a route to achieving this with the assistance of instrument manufacturers, metrology laboratories, and experts leading to an international standard for XPS intensity scale calibration.
The lead authors failed to name two collaborators as co-authors. The authors listed should include:
Miss Claudia L. Compean-Gonzalez (ORCID:
0000-0002-2367-8450) and Dr. Giacomo Ceccone (ORCID:
0000-0003-4637-0771).
These co-authors participated in VAMAS project A27, provided data that were analyzed and presented in this publication (and supporting information), and reviewed the manuscript before submission.
We report the results of a Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards (VAMAS) interlaboratory study on the measurement of the shell thickness and chemistry of nanoparticle coatings. Peptide-coated gold particles were supplied to laboratories in two forms: a colloidal suspension in pure water and particles dried onto a silicon wafer. Participants prepared and analyzed these samples using either X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) or low energy ion scattering (LEIS). Careful data analysis revealed some significant sources of discrepancy, particularly for XPS. Degradation during transportation, storage, or sample preparation resulted in a variability in thickness of 53%. The calculation method chosen by XPS participants contributed a variability of 67%. However, variability of 12% was achieved for the samples deposited using a single method and by choosing photoelectron peaks that were not adversely affected by instrumental transmission effects. The study identified a need for more consistency in instrumental transmission functions and relative sensitivity factors since this contributed a variability of 33%. The results from the LEIS participants were more consistent, with variability of less than 10% in thickness, and this is mostly due to a common method of data analysis. The calculation was performed using a model developed for uniform, flat films, and some participants employed a correction factor to account for the sample geometry, which appears warranted based upon a simulation of LEIS data from one of the participants and comparison to the XPS results.