Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (26)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (20)
- Forschungsbericht (13)
- Beitrag zu einem Sammelband (11)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (8)
- Posterpräsentation (5)
- Sonstiges (3)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (86) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Aerosol (8)
- Laserdrucker (8)
- Blauer Engel (6)
- Bürogeräte (5)
- Cascade impactor (5)
- Emissionen (4)
- Particles (4)
- Partikelemission (4)
- Partikelemissionen (4)
- TXRF (4)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (26)
In einem von der Firma GSE Lining Technology GmbH geförderten F+E-Vorhaben wurde die Langzeitscherfestigkeit und die Oxidationsstabilität von deren strukturierten PE-HD- Dichtungsbahnen untersucht. Bei diesen strukturierten Dichtungsbahnen wird das Strukturmaterial in einem eigenen Arbeitsgang aufgebracht. Das PE-HD-Material der Grundbahn war in allen Fällen Vestolen A 3512 R. Für das Strukturmaterial wurden die PE- LLD-Werkstoffe Ladene 118 N mit zwei Rußbatches (Proben 229/1 und 229/2) und Dowlex 2045 E mit zwei Rußbatches (Proben 229/3 und 229/4) verwendet. Die Langzeitscherfestigkeit wurde in Zeitstand-Scherversuchen in Wasser bei 80 °C getestet und dabei auch die Veränderung der OIT Werte von Grundbahn und Strukturmaterial gemessen. Die Oxidationsstabilität des Strukturmaterials im Vergleich zur Grundbahn wurde in Autoklavenversuchen an Proben im Wasserbad unter einem Sauerstoffdruck von 20 bar und 80°C geprüft. Nach der Immersion wurde die Veränderung der Reibungsparameter in Scherkastenversuchen ermittelt.
Dr. Stefan Seeger of the German Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung - BAM) tells of his successful experience using Granta's CES software to make an eco-materials knowledge resource for automotive, construction, and other industries in the Berlin region.
Zulassung von Schutzlagen
(1995)
Long term waste containment - A challenge to geotextiles and geomembranes made of plastic materials
(1997)
Qualitative characterization of nanoparticle emissions from office machines with printing functions
(2007)
Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison of Particulate Emissions from Office Machines (ABSTRACT)
(2009)
This work presents results of investigations towards the emission of chemical reaction products and sound pressure during an outdoor and an indoor firework display. Potentially harmful and toxic gases, and aerosols, were measured as well as sound pressures. Aerosols were measured with a Differential Mobility Analyzer (DMA) as well as a Laser Particle Counter. The focus was on particles with diameters between 11 nm and 20 µm. A transportable Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy detector registered the concentrations of emitted reaction gases, simultaneously. During the outdoor firework display, peak particle concentrations of >550000 particles cm-3, equivalent to a mass concentration of approximately 3.95 mg m-3, were detected, revealing a concentration maximum at approximately 175 nm particle diameter. The time-averaged particle mass concentration did not exceed 1.58 mg m-3 over 15 minutes. Due to the large distances (110 m) to the firing points, no significant harmful or toxic gas concentrations were measured during the entire firework display. In contrast, concentrations of sulphur dioxide (SO2) rose after an indoor firework display in a large event hall. On two days, more than 23000 particles cm-3 (which equates to a mass concentration of approximately 0.41 mg m-3) were detected when the hall ventilation was turned off, and more than 11000 particles cm-3 (which equates to a mass concentration of approximately 1.18 mg m-3) when the hall ventilation was activated. Concentration maxima appeared at approximately 300 nm particle diameter. The time-averaged particle concentrations in this case did not exceed 0.56 mg m-3 (over 15 minutes).
Development of wood-inorganic composites with enhanced properties and environmental stability
(2002)
NM 105, Ti02 (P25) could not be ignited as dust layer and dispersed in air as dust/air-mixture as well. This dust is not dust explosible and the burning behaviour corresponds to Burning Class 1 (no Ignition). The results have shown that the tested sample is thus not combustible at all, because it is already oxidized completely.