Evil and Evil Aesthetics - Reading >Aesthetic Evil Course: A Romantic Interpretation< [恶的美学与美学的恶——读《恶的美学历程:一种浪漫主义解读》][application of Fromm's theories to art]

  • 哲学家弗洛姆曾说:>凡服务于生者为善,凡服务于死者为恶。<如果坚持伦理学的取向,>恶<根本就不可能有美学的价值。然而>美<,并不是客观唯物的,而是主观唯心的,它是人们对自己的需求被满足时所产生的愉悦反应的反应,在这个角度,>恶<又不失去一种美学的可能。正因为如此,黑格尔关于>恶<的美学,便充满了矛盾,一方面,他认为恶是>乏味的、无意义的<,不允许成为艺术的对象;另一方面,黑格尔又说:>假如他
  • Philosopher Erich Fromm said: >Where the service is good for the living, the dead who serve evil<. If you insist on ethical orientation, >evil< simply do not have aesthetics value. However, >the United States< is not an objective materialist, but subjective idealism, it is people's reactions to pleasant reaction was to meet their needs arising, in this point of view, >evil< without losing the possibility of an aesthetic . Because of this, Hegel on the >evil< of aesthetics, it is full of contradictions, on the one hand, he believes that evil is >boring, meaningless<, is not allowed to become art objects; on the other hand, Hegel again said: >If they […] [automatic translation]

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Lei Ye
Document Type:Articles
Language:Chinese
Year of first Publication:2014
Release Date:2015/12/14
Format:no copy existent / keine Kopie vorhanden
IdNo:Ye_Lei_2014
Writings about Erich Fromm (Secondary Literature):Articles / Artikel
Erich Fromm's Library and Erich Fromm Archive:Articles / Artikel
Licence (German):
Einverstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.