• search hit 4 of 4
Back to Result List

Moving towards patient-centered care and shared decision-making in Germany

  • The main focus of this paper is to describe the development and current state of policy, research and implementation of patient-centered care (PCC) and shared decision-making (SDM) in Germany. What is the current state in health policy? Since 2013, the Law on Patients' Rights has standardized all rights and responsibilities regarding medical care for patients in Germany. This comprises the right to informed decisions, comprehensive and comprehensible information, and decisions based on a clinician-patient partnership. In addition, reports and action plans such as the German Ethics Council's report on patient well-being, the National Health Literacy Action Plan, or the National Cancer Plan emphasize and foster PCC and SDM on a policy level. There are a number of public organizations in Germany that support PCC and SDM. How are patients and the public involved in health policy and research? Publishers and funding agencies increasingly demand patient and public involvement. Numerous initiatives and organizations are involved in publicizing ways to engage patients and the public. Also, an increasing number of public and research institutions have established patient advisory boards. How is PCC and SDM taught? Great progress has been made in introducing SDM into the curricula of medical schools and other health care providers' (HCPs) schools (e.g., nursing, physical therapy). What is the German research agenda? The German government and other public institutions have constantly funded research programs in which PCC and SDM are important topics. This yielded several large-scale funding initiatives and helped to develop SDM training programs for HCPs in different fields of health care and information materials. Recently, two implementation studies on SDM have been conducted. What is the current uptake of PCC and SDM in routine care, and what implementation efforts are underway? Compared to the last country report from 2017, PCC and SDM efforts in policy, research and education have been intensified. However, many steps are still needed to reliably implement SDM in routine care in Germany. Specifically, the further development and uptake of decision tools and countrywide SDM trainings for HCPs require further efforts. Nevertheless, an increasing number of decision support tools - primarily with support from health insurance funds and other public agencies - are to be implemented in routine care. Also, recent implementation efforts are promising. For example, reimbursement by health insurance companies of hospital-wide SDM implementation is being piloted. A necessary next step is to nationally coordinate the gathering and provision of the many PCC and SDM resources available.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author:Pola Hahlweg, Christiane Bieber, Anna Levke BrüttGND, Marie-Luise Dierks, Jörg DirmaierORCiD, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, Wolfgang Eich, Friedemann Geiger, David KlempererORCiDGND, Klaus Koch, Mirjam Körner, Hardy Müller, Isabelle Scholl, Martin Härter
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.001
ISSN:1865-9217
Parent Title (German):Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen
Publisher:Elsevier
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2022
Release Date:2022/06/24
Tag:Health policy; Implementation; Patient involvement; Patient-centered care; Shared decision-making
GND Keyword:Patientenorientierte Krankenpflege; Entscheidungsfindung; Patient; Deutschland; Gesundheitswesen
Volume:171
First Page:49
Last Page:57
Institutes:Fakultät Angewandte Sozial- und Gesundheitswissenschaften
Begutachtungsstatus:peer-reviewed
research focus:Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik
Licence (German):Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG