Part of a Book
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (911) (remove)
Language
- English (639)
- German (247)
- French (10)
- Spanish (7)
- Italian (3)
- Other (2)
- Multiple languages (1)
- Dutch (1)
- Portuguese (1)
Keywords
- social innovation (10)
- Governance Report (7)
- Social Entrepreneurship (4)
- Sociology (4)
- Liberal Order (3)
- Ministerial advisers (3)
- Social Policy (3)
- Social entrepreneurship (3)
- China (2)
- Democracy (2)
- Gemeinwirtschaft (2)
- Jugend (2)
- Policy advice (2)
- Politicisation (2)
- Rente (2)
- Social Media (2)
- Soziologie (2)
- Academic discourse (1)
- Accountability; Eurogroup; European Parliament; Council of the EU; Economic Dialogue; European Semester; ESM (1)
- Administrative data (1)
- Agile development (1)
- Aktivität (1)
- Altersvorsorge, Jugend, Finanzen (1)
- Alterung – Bewältigung – Bevölkerungssoziologie – Demographie – Fertilität – Migration – Mortalität (1)
- Aufsatzsammlung (1)
- Außenpolitik (1)
- Beteiligung (1)
- Big data (1)
- Births (1)
- Brexit (1)
- Business Strategy/Leadership (1)
- COVID-19 Hashtags Networks Political communication strategies #CoronaVirusDE #FlattenTheCurve (1)
- Centre for Sustainability (1)
- Charles Sabel (1)
- Child’s residence, Divorce, Gender differences, Life satisfaction, Separation (1)
- Civil Society or Community (1)
- Civil servants (1)
- Civil service (1)
- Climate Policy Departmental Principle Implementation Plan Adaptation Policy Mitigation Policy (1)
- Comparative public administration (1)
- Conflicts law (1)
- Continental tradition (1)
- Control (1)
- Coordination (1)
- Corruption (1)
- Dani Rodrik (1)
- Data processing (1)
- Deaths (1)
- Defence (1)
- Demographic rates (1)
- Demography (1)
- Differentiation (1)
- Digital Governance (1)
- Digital government (1)
- Disintegration (1)
- Divorce (1)
- Dual vocational training, Higher education, Permeability, Institutional change (1)
- EU Law, International Law, Law (1)
- Economic crimes (1)
- Empirical research finding (1)
- Empirical study (1)
- Entrepreneurship (1)
- Entwicklungsländer (1)
- European Court of Human Rights and minority rights in Turkey (1)
- European Union law (1)
- Europäische Union (1)
- Executive triangle (1)
- Explainable AI User research Financial technology HCI Usability Artificial Intelligence (1)
- Fertility Finland Germany Multipartner fertility Stepfamily (1)
- Forecasting (1)
- Foreign Policy (1)
- Framework Convention on National Minorities (1)
- Gender (1)
- Germany Fertility (1)
- Global civil society (1)
- Globalisation (1)
- Hashtags (1)
- Health (1)
- Identity (1)
- Innovation (1)
- Institutional Entrepreneurship (1)
- Institutional development (1)
- Institutionalismus (1)
- Institutionelle Infrastruktur (1)
- International trade (1)
- Internet (1)
- Jonathan Zeitlin (1)
- Karl Polanyi (1)
- Konfliktforschung (1)
- Kurdish question and democratization in Turkey (1)
- Latin America (1)
- Legitimacy (1)
- Liberal-democratic values (1)
- Management (1)
- Marriages (1)
- Media and journalism in Turkey (1)
- Mega-regional trade agreements (1)
- Migration (1)
- Ministerial cabinets (1)
- NATO (1)
- NGOs (1)
- Nachhaltige Entwicklung (1)
- Networks (1)
- New modes of governance (1)
- Nongovernmental Organizations (1)
- Nudging (1)
- Patronage (1)
- Policy advisory systems (1)
- Policy sciences, policy planning, public administration (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Political Science, Political Institutions, Comparative Politics, Corruption, Governance (1)
- Political communication strategies (1)
- Politikberatung (1)
- Politikrelevantes Wissen (1)
- Population registers (1)
- Prognosen (1)
- Public Affairs (1)
- Public administration (1)
- Public services (1)
- Quantitative Methoden (1)
- Rechtsstaat (1)
- Residential moves (1)
- Scaling (1)
- Security cooperation (1)
- Self-selection (1)
- Social Change (1)
- Social Sciences (1)
- Social constructivism (1)
- Social enterprises - Hybrid organizing - Institutional context - Social problems - Isomorphism - Context dependence (1)
- South Africa (1)
- Sozialunternehmertum · Sozialunternehmen · Organisationen · Institutioneller Kontext · Governance (1)
- Sozialwesen (1)
- Special advisers (1)
- State capacity (1)
- Statistical information (1)
- Survey data (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Tax evasion (1)
- Teilnahme (1)
- The historical evolution and the legal and political framework of Turkey's media policies (1)
- The implementation of the European Court of Human Rights judgments on the Kurdish conflict in Turkey (1)
- Transatlantic security community (1)
- Verfassungsrecht (1)
- Vital events (1)
- Vital statistics (1)
- Wahlprognosen (1)
- Weberian bureaucracy (1)
- Wohlfahrtspflege (1)
- Work disability (1)
- Worldwide Governance Indicators (1)
- carbon colonialism (1)
- causal model (1)
- charity (1)
- climate change (1)
- coal (1)
- communication (1)
- credibility (1)
- deliberative democracy, deliberation, democratic innovation, democratization, deliberative systems, political theory (1)
- e-government (1)
- governance (1)
- higher vocational education, equity, higher level skills, comparison (1)
- institutions (1)
- integration costs (1)
- market value (1)
- mechanism-based research (1)
- media access (1)
- media capacity (1)
- nonprofit sector (1)
- philanthropy (1)
- realism (1)
- rule of Law, europeanization, state building, conditionality, corruption, East Central Europe (1)
- scaling (1)
- scientists (1)
- social change (1)
- variable renewables (1)
- vocational education, vocational training, Germany, France, comparison, typology (1)
- vocational training ; higher education ; Europe ; Germany ; France ; Austria ; Europeanization ; Bologna process ; Copenhagen process (1)
- welfare, Lisbon Treaty, social welfare law, social welfare policy, social inclusion, Lisbon Strategy policy (1)
- » Sociology of Familiy, Youth and Aging (1)
Contrary to conventional wisdom, even Xi Jinping, who is often depicted in the media and pundit world as having centralized control over nearly every dimension of Chinese governance, still must rely on powerful technology corporations to carry out his will in the increasingly important Internet sector. This suggests a model of political control significantly more nuanced than most observers realize. This chapter argues that Xi Jinping does not rule the Internet and more specifically social media via a tight command-and-control structure, which implies that he is the ultimate decision-maker and companies simply implement his policy decisions. Instead, the chapter demonstrates based on process-tracing that China’s governance of the Internet is best understood as a corporate management model, whereby the Chinese state engages in a partnership with technology companies. Xi Jinping assumes a leadership role enforced by state instruments of control and cooptation strategies. At the same time, the state remains dependent on companies due to their informational, organizational, and institutional resources.
The aim of this chapter is to consider whether accusations of judicial activism towards the European Courts are rooted not in the activity of the CJEU per se but rather a wider ‘imbalance’ between law and politics in the present-day EU. Revisiting an earlier chapter, the chapter considers three sources of such an imbalance: the gap between the jurisdiction of the CJEU and the EU’s legislative competence; judicial reasoning at the EU level; and the imbalance in the EU between market and non-market objectives. While the chapter argues that the EU retains such an imbalance, recent developments, particularly the increasing dynamism of the EU legislature, have significantly narrowed the gap between the EU’s political and legal capacities in the last decade. As the chapter will conclude, the EU carries a less institutionally ‘lonely’ Court than in the past, providing the Union’s judiciary with greater leverage to temper activist claims.
The Court inhabits a ‘political space’ to which it is called upon to respond. This points to its need to develop cooperative relationships not only with courts but also with political actors (such as national governments and the EU legislature) and even to directly address and explain decisions to EU citizens themselves. This book is aimed at answering the question of ‘How does the CJEU position itself as a political as well as a legal actor?’ with a view to better understanding the work of the Court and addressing its contestation. For that purpose, we explore in this introductory chapter what is meant by judicial ‘activism’ and judicial ‘politics’, before examining the different varieties of judicial politics our authors have shown an interest in. This will pave the way to drawing some lessons on the factors to take into account when seeking to address and respond to contestation of the work of the Court.