EU Police Cooperation (1976 - 2016). State Preferences in the Context of Differentiated Integration

  • European internal security has become increasingly relevant in recent years. Various incidents across EU Member States have demonstrated the transnationalisation of terrorism and organised crime as well as the need to work together to safeguard security in a progressively borderless Europe. Governments and citizens have consistently called for a growing role of the EU and coordinating at this level. In this light, it appears striking that different cooperation initiatives continue to mushroom inside and outside the EU framework. Their parallel emergence duplicates efforts at best but can also obstruct information exchange and produce security failures. This dissertation sets out to investigate why Member States acknowledge the benefits of integration, yet advance differentiation as well. Concretely, it studies the formation of state preferences in the still largely intergovernmental field of EU police cooperation. It asks which factors shape government positions and how they drive Member States to favour integration. In particular, the influence of cross-country interdependencies, politicisation and policy entrepreneurship might help explain processes of integration and differentiation in this policy area. Their relative importance as drivers of state preferences is studied across the institutional development of EU police cooperation between 1976 and 2016. The analysis is organised around four ‘milestones’ in the integration of this field: 1) the 1976 intergovernmental Trevi Group; 2) the 1995 Europol Convention establishing the European Police Office (Europol); (3) the 2009 Europol Council Decision establishing Europol as official EU agency; and (4) the 2016 Europol Regulation. This dissertation finds that interdependencies in the fight against common threats mattered most as driver of state integration preferences in the early stages of European police cooperation. More recently, supranational policy entrepreneurship has emerged as key influence of pro-integration attitudes among Member States and can be expected to grow in importance. Politicisation, against it, provides windows of opportunity to this end and acts rather as amplifier of integration pressure from interdependencies and policy entrepreneurs. In sum, the asymmetrical effects of all three drivers explains the formation of diverging governmental attitudes towards integration and can thus help account for the persistence of parallel processes of differentiation and integration.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Document Type:Doctoral Thesis
Language:English
Author(s):Franca König
Advisor:Markus Jachtenfuchs
Referee:Markus Jachtenfuchs, Trauner Florian
Hertie Collections (Serial Number):Dissertations submitted to the Hertie School (07/2019)
Publication year:2019
Publishing Institution:Hertie School
Granting Institution:Hertie School
Thesis date:2019/11/29
Number pages:297
DOI:https://doi.org/10.48462/opus4-3107
Release Date:2019/12/16
Notes:
Please contact the Hertie library team (library@hertie-school.org) for getting access.
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften
Licence of document (German):Metadaten / metadata