Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Beitrag zu einem Sammelband (8) (entfernen)
Sprache
- Englisch (8)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (8)
Schlagworte
- Quality assurance (3)
- Calibration (2)
- Fluorescence (2)
- Fluorescence spectroscopy (2)
- Plasma modification (2)
- Quantification (2)
- Spectral correction (2)
- Standard (2)
- Comparability (1)
- Emission (1)
The potential of spectrofluorometry and fluorescence microscopy for the characterization and quantification of different functionalities like OH and NH2 groups at plasma-chemically modified polymer surfaces is assessed using traditional reactive dyes such as dansyl derivatives and a sophisticated VIS-excitable chromogenic and fluorogenic pyrylium label showing binding-induced spectral and intensity changes in absorption and emission. Aiming at an improved fluorometric surface analysis, based upon these measurements, several sources of uncertainty inherent to fluorescence measurements are illustrated ranging from environment-dependent dye absorption and emission features over spectral correction and nonspecific adsorption to the critical influence of label choice on the measured background. Solutions to these drawbacks are given thereby underlining the potential of fluorometry for surface analysis.
The aim of this article is to illustrate the need for an improved quality assurance in fluorescence microscopy. From the instrument-side, this can be achieved by a better understanding, consideration, and regular control of the instrument-specific parameters and quantities affecting measured fluorescence signals. Particularly, the need for requirements on physical- and chemical-type instrument standards for the characterization and performance validation of spectral fluorescence microscopes (SFMs) is discussed and suitable systems are presented. Special emphasis is given to spectral fluorescence standards and to day-to-day intensity standards for SFMs. Fluorescence standards and well-characterized fluorescence microscopes are the first and essential steps towards the comparability and the understanding of the variability in fluorescence microscopy data in medical and life sciences. In addition, standards enable the distinction between instrument-specific variations and fluorescent label- or probe-related uncertainties as well as generally sample-related effects.
Problems associated with the measurement of photoluminescence are briefly reviewed, including relevant instrument parameters affecting these measurements. Procedures for the characterization of relevant instruments are discussed, focusing on spectrofluorometers, and fit-for-purpose methods including suitable standards are recommended. The aim here is to increase the awareness of the importance of reliable instrument characterization and to improve the comparability of measurements of photoluminescence.