Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (89)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (50)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (30)
- Posterpräsentation (8)
- Beitrag zu einem Sammelband (5)
- Forschungsbericht (5)
- Buchkapitel (1)
- Dissertation (1)
- Sonstiges (1)
Schlagworte
- Tensile properties (15)
- BAM-Liste (14)
- Dangerous goods (14)
- Sealing materials (12)
- Biodiesel (11)
- Biofuels (11)
- Compatibility (11)
- BAM-List (9)
- Polyethylene grades (9)
- Shore hardness (9)
- Beständigkeit (7)
- Compatibility evaluations (7)
- Polyethylen (7)
- Corrosion resistance (6)
- Dichtungswerkstoffe (6)
- Korrosionsbeständigkeit (6)
- Polyethylenformstoffe (6)
- Beständigkeitsbewertung (5)
- Corrosion tests (5)
- Gefahrguttransport (5)
- Gefahrgutverpackungen (5)
- High-alloyed metallic tank materials (5)
- Spannungsrissbeständigkeit (5)
- Biokraftstoffe (4)
- Change in tensile properties (4)
- Dangerous goods packagings (4)
- Design type tests (4)
- E85 (4)
- Gefahrgüter (4)
- Heizöllagerbehälter (4)
- Tankcontainer (4)
- Tankfahrzeuge (4)
- Tankwerkstoffe (4)
- B10 (3)
- Baumusterprüfungen (3)
- Bioethanol (3)
- Dangerous goods packaging (3)
- Duplexstahl (3)
- Eisenbahnkesselwagen (3)
- FAME (3)
- FTIR (3)
- Gefahrgutverpackung (3)
- Heizöl (3)
- Lebensdauer (3)
- Mass loss (3)
- Material parameters (3)
- Metallene Werkstoffe (3)
- Monitoring (3)
- Nickel alloy (3)
- Polyethylene (3)
- Polyethylenterephthalat (3)
- Schadensursachen (3)
- Schädigungsgrad (3)
- Verpackungen (3)
- Acoustic emission (2)
- Aged biodiesel (2)
- Aged heating oil with 10% biodiesel (B10) (2)
- Beschleunigungssensoren (2)
- Beständigkeitsuntersuchungen (2)
- Change in MFR and tensile properties (2)
- Change in mass (2)
- Compatibility evaluation (2)
- Duplex steel (2)
- Duplexsteel (2)
- E10 (2)
- FTIR analysis (2)
- FTIR spectra (2)
- Faseroptische Sensorik (2)
- HDPE grades (2)
- Heating oil tanks (2)
- Korrosion (2)
- Korrosionsschäden (2)
- Korrosionsuntersuchungen (2)
- Laboratory method (2)
- Leckage (2)
- Materialschäden (2)
- Metallische Behälterwerkstoffe (2)
- Permeation barriers (2)
- Polyethylene terephthalate (2)
- Polymeric materials (2)
- Polymers (2)
- Polymerwerkstoffe (2)
- Resistance to oxidative degradation (2)
- Rohrleitung (2)
- Schallemission (2)
- Service life (2)
- Shore-Härte (2)
- Standardflüssigkeiten (2)
- Stapeldruckprüfung (2)
- Stress corrosion cracking (2)
- Stress cracking resistance (2)
- Superaustenitic steels (2)
- Tank materials (2)
- Transport (2)
- Zugeigenschaften (2)
- biofuels (2)
- compatibility (2)
- sealing materials (2)
- 1.4362 (1)
- Accelerometer (1)
- Accelerometers (1)
- Acid corrosion (1)
- Aged heating oil with 10% and 20% biodiesel (1)
- Ageing (1)
- Assimilierungsliste (1)
- Atmosphärische Korrosion (1)
- Austenitic CrNiMo steel (1)
- BAM-GGR 003 (1)
- BAM-list (1)
- Baumusterprüfung (1)
- Bauschäden (1)
- Bending tests on pipe segments (1)
- Beständigkeit gegen oxidativen Abbau (1)
- Beständigkeit in Biokraftstoffen (1)
- Beständigkeitsbewertungen (1)
- Bewertung der Korrosionsbeständigkeit (1)
- Biegefestigkeit (1)
- Biegesteifigkeit (1)
- Biobrennstoff (1)
- Biozide (1)
- Change in shore hardness (1)
- Chemische Verträglichkeit (1)
- Compression set (1)
- Continous monitoring (1)
- Corrosion (1)
- Corrosion test (1)
- Datenbank Gefahrgut (1)
- Degree of damage (1)
- Degree of degradation (1)
- Design-type tests (1)
- Diesel fuel (1)
- Distributed acoustic sensing (1)
- Doppelwandbehälter (1)
- Drop test (1)
- Drop tests (1)
- Druckkraft (1)
- Druckverformungsrestprüfung (1)
- Duplex steels (1)
- E10 (Kraftstoff mit bis zu 10% Ethanol) (1)
- Economic Losses (1)
- Eindringtiefen (1)
- Elastomer (1)
- Elastomere (1)
- Elastomers (1)
- Elektrische Fremdbeeinflussung (1)
- Environmental Pollution (1)
- FNCT (1)
- FTIR spectroscopy (1)
- Fiber optic sensing (1)
- Fibre optic acoustic sensing (1)
- Fibre optic sensing (1)
- Fluorkautschuk (FKM) (1)
- Formstoffkennwerte (1)
- Fuel with 10 % ethanol (1)
- Fuels (1)
- Full notch creep test (1)
- Gefahrguttanks (1)
- Gefahrstofflagerung (1)
- HDPE (1)
- HDPE-Formstoffe (1)
- Heating oil (1)
- Heating oil - biodiesel - blend (1)
- Heating oil storage tanks (1)
- Heating oil with 10 % FAME (1)
- Heating oil with 10 % biodiesel (1)
- Heating oil with 10% biodiesel (1)
- Heating oil with 20% biodiesel (1)
- Heating oil-Biodiesel-Blend (1)
- Heizöl mit 10% Biodiesel (1)
- Heizöl mit 20% Biodiesel (B20) (1)
- Heizöl-20% Biodiesel-Blend (1)
- Heizöl-FAME-Blends (1)
- High alloyed stainless steel (1)
- High-alloyed metallic tank (1)
- High-alloyed stainless steel (1)
- Hochlegierte Tankwandungswerkstoffe (1)
- Hydraulic pressure test (1)
- Höherlegierte Tankwerkstoffe (1)
- Höherlegierte Werkstoffe (1)
- Höherlegierte metallische Tankwerkstoffe (1)
- Höherlegierte metallische Werkstoffe (1)
- Korrosionstest (1)
- Korrosive Medien (1)
- Kraftstoffe mit biogenen Anteilen (1)
- Kraftstoffe mit und ohne biogene Anteile (1)
- Leak detection (1)
- Leakproofness test (1)
- Luftverunreinigung (1)
- Materialkennwerte (1)
- Melt Flow Rate (MFR) (1)
- Metallic materials (1)
- Metallische Tankwerkstoffe (1)
- Mischsäuren (1)
- Monitoring von Rohrleitungen (1)
- Nachweis der chemischen Verträglichkeit (1)
- Nachweisverfahren (1)
- Nickel-base alloy (1)
- Nickel-based alloy (1)
- Nickelbasislegierung (1)
- Nickellegierung (1)
- Nickellegierungen (1)
- Nitric acid (1)
- Notched impact strength at -30°C (1)
- Oxidativer Abbau (1)
- PE-HD (1)
- Packagings for the transport of dangerous goods (1)
- Pipeline monitoring (1)
- Pipelines (1)
- Polymer in fuels (1)
- Polymere (1)
- Polymere Behälterwerkstoffe (1)
- Polymere Dichtungs-, Beschichtungs- und Auskleidungswerkstoffe (1)
- Polymere Werkstoffe (1)
- Pre-storage with nitric acid (1)
- Premium grade fuels (1)
- Proof of compatibility (1)
- RME (1)
- Resistance (1)
- Resistance of polymers (1)
- Rohrbiegeprüfstand (1)
- Salpetersäure (1)
- Schadensursachen an Rohrleitungen (1)
- Schmelze-Masse-Fließrate (1)
- Schädigung (1)
- Shore Hardness (1)
- Sonderedelstähle (1)
- Stacking test (1)
- Stapeldruckprüfungen (1)
- Steel (1)
- Stoffbezogene Baumusterzulassung (1)
- Storage (1)
- Struktur- und fluidmechanische Schwingungen (1)
- Superaustenite (1)
- Tanks (1)
- Tankwerkstoff (1)
- Transport tanks (1)
- Transport tanks of dangerous goods (1)
- Transport und Lagerung von Chemikalien (1)
- Transporttankwerkstoffe (1)
- Verpackungen zum Transport von Gefahrgütern (1)
- Verpackungsmaterial (1)
- Versagensgrenzen (1)
- Verteilte Faseroptische Sensorik (1)
- Verträglichkeitsnachweis (1)
- Werkstoffbeständigkeit (1)
- Werkstoffkennwerte (1)
- X2CrNiN23-4 (1)
- Zeitstandbeanspruchung (1)
- dangerous goods packagings (1)
- polyethylene terephthalate (1)
- stress cracking resistance (1)
- test methods (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 3 Gefahrgutumschließungen; Energiespeicher (27)
- 3.2 Gefahrguttanks und Unfallmechanik (27)
- 7 Bauwerkssicherheit (9)
- 7.6 Korrosion und Korrosionsschutz (9)
- 1 Analytische Chemie; Referenzmaterialien (3)
- 1.4 Prozessanalytik (3)
- 2 Prozess- und Anlagensicherheit (3)
- 2.1 Sicherheit von Energieträgern (3)
- 8 Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (3)
- 8.1 Sensorik, mess- und prüftechnische Verfahren (3)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (89)
Use of Higher -alloyed metallic materials and duplex steels for transport tanks of dangerous goods
(2011)
Beständigkeitsbewertungen von Werkstoffen für den Transport von Gefahrgütern durch die BAM-Liste
(2005)
Resistance to stress cracking by wetting solution is one of the selected properties together with the corresponding test method FNCT and tolerances for a comparison of polyethylene grades of one design type in the procedural rule on suitability proof for alternative plastic resins used for packagings and intermediate bulk Containers (IBCs) for the transport of dangerous goods.
The environmental stress crack resistance determined by Full Notch Creep Test (FNCT) represents the impacts from the stacking tests at 40 °C performed with Standard liquid wetting solution (without pre-storage) and with normal butyl acetate saturated wetting solution (pre-storage with normal butyl acetate). Environmental stress crack resistance determined with FNCT for the polyethylene grades was related to the times to failure of different jerrican samples made of these grades in stacking tests with 5 % wetting solution and a n-butyl acetate saturated wetting solution (pre-storage with n-butyl acetate) at 40 °C. The FNCT is suitable for comparison of polyethylene grades in relation to environmental stress crack resistance independent of their use as drum, IBC or jerrican material. The stiffness of polyethylene grades should be taken into account to the comparison as jerricans are not only chemically but also mechanically stressed.
Use of Higher Alloyed Metallic Materials and Duplex Steels for Transport Tanks of Dangerous Goods
(2011)
Compatibility of high density polyethylene grades with bioethanol-gasoline blends and biodiesel
(2012)
Compatibility of high density polyethylene grades with bioehanol-gasoline blends and biodiesel
(2012)
Biofuels including ethanol and biodiesel (fatty acid methyl ester) represent an impor-tant renewable fuel alternative to petroleum-derived transport fuels. Increasing bio-fuel use would bring some benefits, such as a reduction in oil demands and green-house gas emissions, and an improvement in air quality.
Materials compatibility is a major concern whenever the fuel composition is changed in a fuel system.
The aim of this work is to study the interaction between sealing materials such as FKM (fluorocarbon rubber), EPDM (ethylene-propylene-diene rubber), CR (chloro-prene rubber), CSM (chlorosulfonated polyethylene), NBR (acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber), IIR (butyl rubber), VMQ (methyl-vinyl-silicone rubber) and FVMQ (methyl-fluoro-silicone rubber) and biofuels such as biodiesel, E85 (fuel with 85% ethanol) and B10 (heating oil with 10% biodiesel) at 70°C for 84 days. Experiments were con-ducted with tests specimens of theses elastomers to document the changes in the mass and tensile properties of these sealing materials according to ISO 1817.
The exposure tests of the elastomers in E85 at 70°C showed that the weight gain caused by swelling of the test specimens was in the range of 3% to 12%. However, the weight gain of the fluorinated elastomers was at the lower end of this range. Tensile strength and breaking elongation decreased by 22% to 61% or 13% to 77%. The lowest decrease in the tensile properties was determined for FKM, EPDM und IIR. These sealing materials were evaluated as resistant to E85 up to a temperature of 70°C.
Biodiesel absorbed water more quickly and aged faster than conventional diesel fuel. The weight loss of the elastomers varied between 9% (FKM) and 126% (CSM) in biodiesel. FKM was evaluated as resistant with a 16% reduction in tensile strength, a 2% reduction in breaking elongation and low weight loss. NBR, EPDM, CSM and VMQ were evaluated as not resistant. CSM even lost 84% of its original tensile strength and 78% of its breaking elongation.
The highest weight gain as a result of swelling was measured for CSM with 86%, for EPDM with 84% and for VMQ with 54% in B10, while the fluorine-containing elasto-mers FKM (1%) and FVMQ (3%) absorbed much less B10 and swelled less. FKM lost 23% in tensile strength and 17% in breaking elongation; FMVQ lost 29% in ten-sile strength and 36% in breaking elongation. FMVQ was, therefore, only limited in its resistance to B10.
The elastomers NBR, EPDM, CSM and VMQ were not resistant to B10 at all as the decrease in the tensile properties was significantly over 50%. NBR lost about 93% and CSM about 100% of its breaking elongation.
The conclusion of the investigations at 70°C is that FKM is the most resistant sealing material in biodiesel, E85 (fuel with 85% ethanol) and B10 (heating oil with 10% biodiesel).
Oxidative damage of an Intermediate Bulk Container (IBC) made of polyethylene by 53 % nitric acid
(2013)
Biofuels including ethanol and biodiesel (fatty acid methyl ester) represent an important renewable fuel alternative to petroleum-derived transport fuels. Increasing biofuel use would bring some benefits, such as a reduction in oil demands and greenhouse gas emissions, and an improvement in air quality.
Materials compatibility is a major concern whenever the fuel composition is changed in a fuel system. The question arises of whether sealing materials are resistant to fuels with bioethanol and biodiesel (rapeseed oil fatty acid methyl ester).
The aim of this work is to study the interaction between sealing materials such as FKM (fluorocarbon rubber), EPDM (ethylene-propylene-diene rubber), CR (chloroprene rubber), CSM (chlorosulfonated polyethylene), NBR (acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber), IIR (butyl rubber), VMQ (methyl-vinyl-silicone rubber), FVMQ (methyl-fluoro-silicone rubber) and PA (polyamide) and biofuels such as biodiesel (FAME, non-aged and 2 years aged), E85 (fuel with 85% ethanol) and B10 (heating oil with 10% biodiesel, non-aged and one year aged) compared with premium-grade fuel at 20°C, 40°C and 70°C for 84 days. Exposure experiments were conducted with specimens of these elastomers to document the changes in the mass and tensile properties of these sealing materials. Visual examination of some test specimens clearly showed a great volume increase until breakage or partial dissolution.
The sealing materials FVMQ, VMQ and PA were evaluated as resistant in E85 at 20°C and 40°C with a reduction of tensile properties limited to 15%. None of the examined materials was evaluated as resistant at 70°C with even fluorocarbon rubber losing 20% of its tensile strength in E85.
When exposed to biodiesel, elastomers were affected in two ways: firstly, by absorption of liquid by the elastomers and, secondly, by dissolution of soluble components from the elastomers into the liquid medium. Swelling was the result of the high absorption by the elastomers CR, CSM, EPDM, IIR and NBR in comparison to their dis-solution in non-aged and two years aged biodiesel. FKM, VMQ and PA were evaluated as resistant sealing materials in non-aged biodiesel at 40°C. FKM was still resistant in aged biodiesel at 40°C but only to a limited degree at 70°C.
The sealing materials CR, CSM, EPDM, IIR, NBR and VMQ were damaged to a high extent in non-aged and one year aged B10 as a result of swelling up to 70°C. FVMQ and PA can be evaluated as resistant in non-aged and one year aged B10 at 20°C and 40°C. However, FKM was evaluated as resistant up to 70°C.
The exposure tests showed that all the elastomers tested were resistant in the premium-grade fuel Super at 20°C. On increasing the temperature to 40°C, only FKM, VMQ and PA were resistant to Super. At 70°C FKM showed the best resistance.
Resistance to stress cracking by wetting solution is one of the selected properties together with the corresponding test method FNCT and tolerances for a comparison of polyethylene grades of one design type in the procedural rule on suitability proof for alternative plastic resins used for packagings and intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) for the transport of dangerous goods.
The environmental stress crack resistance determined by Full Notch Creep Test (FNCT) represents the impacts from the stacking tests at 40 °C performed with standard liquid wetting solution (without pre-storage) and with normal butyl acetate saturated wetting solution (pre-storage with normal butyl acetate).
Environmental stress crack resistance determined with FNCT for the polyethylene grades was related to the times to failure of different jerrican samples made of these grades in stacking tests with 5% wetting solution and a n-butyl acetate saturated wetting solution (pre-storage with n-butyl acetate) at 40 °C. The FNCT is suitable for comparison of polyethylene grades in relation to environmental stress crack resistance independent of their use as drum, IBC or jerrican material. The stiffness of polyethylene grades should be taken into account to the comparison as jerricans are not only chemically but also mechanically stressed.
Datenbank Gefahrgut - aktuelle Funktionalitäten für den Bereich Verpackung sowie geplanter Ausbau
(2010)
Use of higher-alloyed metallic materials and duplex steels for transport tanks of dangerous goods
(2011)
Compatibility evaluations of selected metallic materials under the influence of dangerous goods are published in the BAM-List - Requirements for Tanks for the Transport of Dangerous Goods” as basis for substance-related prototype approvals for tank Containers designed for the carriage of dangerous goods.
There is a request of the tank manufacturing industry and transportation Companies to incorporate additional materials into the BAM-List, especially corrosionresistant materials because of the large number of corrosive dangerous goods.
One solution to solve corrosion Problems is to line the tank with a polymeric material, an alternative solution is the application of high-alloyed stainless steels and nickel-based alloys as there are alloy 926 (1.4529), alloy 31 (1.4562) and alloy 59 (2.4605).
But there is an interest to use cost-efficient steels with high strength values and concomitant adequate corrosion resistance such as duplex Steel 1.4362 too. This Steel grade was originally developed as a substitute for the austenitic grades 1.4404 and 1.4571. Due to the lower content of the alloy elements nickel and molybdenum this duplex steel is a cost-efficient alternative to molybdenum containing austenite.
Due to the limited number of corrosion test results with welded test samples of these high-alloyed materials and the duplex steel under the influence of corrosive dangerous goods a comprehensive test Programme was performed with these materials in Cooperation with ThyssenKrupp VDM and Deutsche Edelstahlwerke GmbH.
It can be concluded from the test results that the "superaustenitic steels” 1.4529 and 1.4562 as well as the nickel-based alloy 2.4605 are a really good alternative as tank materials for the transport of dangerous goods in comparison to the lining of the tanks. Due to the reduced alloying content, in particular Nickel (3.7 %) and Molybdenum (0.15 %), a lower resistance of the duplex steel 1.4362 compared to the austenitic CrNiMo-steels was observed in acidic media. The duplex Steel is an alternative to the austenitic steels, especially in alkaline media. The test results are included in the current 10th edition of the BAM-List and therefore available for the costumer.
The notched impact strength at -30 °C is one of the selected properties, together with the corresponding test method and tolerances, for a comparison of polyethylene grades of one design type in the procedural rule on suitability proof for alternative plastic resins used for packagings and intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) for the transport of dangerous goods.
The marginal drop heights determined with the drop test at -18 °C after pre-storage of the test samples with 55 % nitric acid at 40 °C only partly related to the notched impact strength at -30 °C. The Charpy method is only suitable for classifying the grade in relation to toughness behavior and using this classification for comparison with other grades. Notched impact strength can provide a qualitative indication if the test samples fail under shock forces.
Conditioning the design types with 55 % nitric acid for 21 days at 40 °C causes an increase in the marginal drop heights of the design types in drop tests at -18 °C when compared with design types without pre-storage. Post-crosslinking of the grades increases stiffness because of the acidic influence.
The notched impact strength at -30 °C is one of the selected properties, together with the corresponding test method and tolerances, for a comparison of polyethylene grades of one design type in the procedural rule on suitability proof for alternative plastic resins used for packagings and intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) for the transport of dangerous goods.
The marginal drop heights determined with the drop test at -18 °C after pre-storage of the test samples with 55 % nitric acid at 40 °C only partly related to the notched impact strength at -30 °C. The Charpy method is only suitable for classifying the grade in relation to toughness behavior and using this classification for comparison with other grades. Notched impact strength can provide a qualitative indication if the test samples fail under shock forces.
Conditioning the design types with 55 % nitric acid for 21 days at 40 °C causes an increase in the marginal drop heights of the design types in drop tests at -18 °C when compared with design types without pre-storage. Post-crosslinking of the grades increases stiffness because of the acidic influence.