Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (50)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (50)
Schlagworte
- Nanoparticle (50) (entfernen)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 1 Analytische Chemie; Referenzmaterialien (22)
- 1.2 Biophotonik (18)
- 6 Materialchemie (5)
- 1.1 Anorganische Spurenanalytik (4)
- 6.5 Synthese und Streuverfahren nanostrukturierter Materialien (2)
- 1.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (1)
- 4 Material und Umwelt (1)
- 4.2 Material-Mikrobiom Wechselwirkungen (1)
- 6.1 Oberflächen- und Dünnschichtanalyse (1)
- 6.3 Strukturanalytik (1)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (50) (entfernen)
Luminescence-based detection methods, ranging from fluorescence spectroscopy for photophysical and mechanistic studies over sensing applications, chromatographic separation techniques and the microarray technology with fluorescence detection to fluorescence microscopy, flow cytometry, single molecule spectroscopy, and molecular imaging to integrating sphere spectroscopy, are among the most widely used methods in the life and material sciences. This is due to e.g., their unique sensitivity enabling the detection of single molecules, potential for multiplexing, ease of combination with spatial resolution, and suitability for remote sensing. Many of these advantages are closely linked to the choice of suitable molecular and nanoscale fluorescent reporters, typically required for signal generation. This includes organic dyes without and with sensor function, fluorophore-encoded polymeric and silica nanoparticles as well as nanocrystalline systems like semiconductor quantum dots and upconversion phosphors, emitting in the visible (vis), near-infrared (NIR), and IR (infrared). Current challenges present the environment sensitivity of most fluorophores, rendering fluorescence spectra, measured intensities/fluorescence quantum yields, and fluorescence decay kinetics matrix-dependent, and instrument-specific distortions of measured fluorescence signals that need to be considered for quantification and comparability of data, particularly fluorescence spectra.
Here, current applications of luminescence-based methods and different types of reporters will be presented. In this context, suitable spectroscopic tools for the characteri-zation of the optical properties of fluorescent reporters and fluorophore-encoded microparticles, analytical tools for the determination of the surface chemistry of different types of particles, and different multiplexing strategies will be discussed.
Nanocrystalline fluorophores like semiconductor quantum dots and rods and recently also lanthanide-based upconversion phosphors with emission in the visible (vis), near-infrared (NIR), and IR (infrared) region are increasingly being used in bioimaging studies and fluorescence assays as well as in photovoltaics and solid state lighting. The assessment and comparison of material performance as well as the development of rational design strategies for improved systems require spectroscopic tools, which enable the determination of the signal-relevant optical properties like photoluminescence quantum yields and brightness values. In the case of nonlinear fluorescence as shown by upconversion materials, such measurements must be also performed as function of excitation power density. In this work, we report on methods for the absolute determination of the photoluminescence quantum yield and brightness of fluorescent particles in dispersion and as powders based on integrating sphere spectroscopy and underline the importance of such measurements for the understanding of the photophysics of such nanocrystals.
The characterization of the optical properties of photoluminescent systems, that scatter, like dispersions of nanoparticles with sizes exceeding about 25 nm or solid nanophosphors is of increasing importance for many applications in the life and material sciences. Examples present nanoscale optical reporters and dye-doped microparticles for bioimaging, fluorescence assays or DNA sequencing as well as nanocrystalline emitters like semiconductor quantum dots and rods or lanthanide-based nanophosphors embedded into solid matrices for solid state lighting, display technologies, or barcoding/security applications. The assessment and comparison of material performance as well as the development of rational design strategies for improved systems require spectroscopic tools, which enable the determination of the signal-relevant optical properties like photoluminescence quantum yields and brightness values.
This encouraged us to built up an integrating sphere setup enabling absolute measurements of photoluminescence spectra and quantum yields of transparent and scattering photoluminescent dispersions and solid samples in different measurement geometries, i.e., direct and indirect illumination and the combination of both geometries and perform first measurements with selected emitters. Here, the design of this setup is presented and first recommendations concerning suitable measurement geometries are given.
The overall interest in nanotoxicity, triggered by the increasing use of nanomaterials in the material and life sciences, and the synthesis of an ever increasing number of new functional nanoparticles calls for standardized test procedures1,2 and for efficient approaches to screen the potential genotoxicity of these materials. Aiming at the development of fast and easy to use, automated microscopic methods for the determination of the genotoxicity of different types of nanoparticles, we assess the potential of the fluorometric γH2AX assay for this purpose. This assay, which can be run on an automated microscopic detection system, relies on the detection of DNA double strand breaks as a sign for genotoxicity3. Here, we provide first results obtained with broadly used nanomaterials like CdSe/CdS and InP/ZnS quantum dots as well as iron oxide, gold, and polymer particles of different surface chemistry with previously tested colloidal stability and different cell lines like Hep-2 and 8E11 cells, which reveal a dependence of the genotoxicity on the chemical composition as well as the surface chemistry of these nanomaterials. These studies will be also used to establish nanomaterials as positive and negative genotoxicity controls or standards for assay performance validation for users of this fluorometric genotoxicity assay. In the future, after proper validation, this microscopic platform technology will be expanded to other typical toxicity assays.
Lanthanide-based upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) offer new strategies for luminescence-based sensing and imaging. One of the best studied materials are hexagonal ß-NaYF4 UCNPs doped with 20% Yb3+ and 2% Er3+, which efficiently convert 976 nm light to photons emitted at 540 nm, 655 nm, and 845 nm, respectively, reveal Long luminescence lifetimes (> 100 µs), and are very photostable and chemically inters.[1,2] The properties of their upconversion (UC) luminescence (UCL) are, however, strongly influenced by particle size, concentration and spatial arrangement of dopant Ions, surface chemistry, and microenvironment.[3,4] In addition, the multiphotonic absorption processes responsible for UCL render UCL dependent on excitation power density (P).
The rational design of brighter UCNPs particle architectures encouraged us to assess systematically the influence of these parameters on UCL for differently doped UCNPs relying on the commonly used ß-NaYf4 matrix using steady state and time resolved fluorometry as well as integrating sphere spectroscopy for P varied over almost three orders of magnitude. This includes comprehensive studies of the influence of size and shell, Yb3+ and Er3+ dopand concentrations, and energy Transfer processes from UCNPs to surface-bound organic dyes or vice versa [5]. Our results underline the need for really quantitative luminescence studies for mechanistic insights, the potential of high p to compensate for UCL surface quenching, and the matrix- and P-dependence of the optimum dopand concentration.
Applications of luminescent nanomaterials like semiconductor nanocrystals (QDs) and lanthanide-based upconversion nanocrystals (UCNPs) in the life sciences such as bioimaging studies or their use as reporter in assays call for a correlation of the photoluminescence (PL) properties of these nanomaterials on ensemble and single particle levels. This is particularly relevant within the context of continuously decreasing detection limits. Aiming at optimum nanomaterials for spectroscopic and microscopic applications, we examine the optical properties of QDs like II/VI QDs and cadmium-free AgInS2/ZnS QDs (AIS/ZnS) and UCNPs of different chemical composition, size, and particle architecture for ensembles and single particles. This includes PL spectra, PL quantum yields (ΦF), brightness values, blinking behavior, and PL decay kinetics. For UCNPs with their nonlinear spectrally converted PL excited by sequential multiphoton absorption, these measurements were also done as a function of excitation power density (P). Special emphasis is dedicated to the performance parameters ΦF and brightness, that determine signal size and provide a measure for nanocrystal quality.[1-5]
Systematic studies of the excitation energy dependence (EED) [6] of the PL properties of II/VI and ternary AgInS2/ZnS QDs reveal the potential of this relatively simple method for providing insights into the electronic energy structure of QDs. The intrinsic nature of the inhomogeneous broadening of the PL bands of AIS/ZnS QDs was confirmed by single particle spectroscopy.[5] By combining P-dependent integration spectroscopy and single particle measurements of UCNPs, using a new custom-made setup, consisting of different lasers, an inverted microscope, different detectors, and an AFM, we could study the P-dependent optical properties of these nonlinear emitters from ~10 W/cm2 up to ~105 W/cm2. These results provide optimum dopant ion concentrations for bioanalytical, spectroscopic, and microscopic applications of UCNP.
Acknowledgement. Financial support by grants RE1203/12-3 and RE1203/20-1 (support of F. Weigert, L. Dhamo, and F. Frenzel) from German Research Council (DFG) is acknowledged.
The rational synthesis and use of nanomaterials require the characterization of many different properties, ranging from particle size and size distribution over surface chemistry to more applicationrelevant features like optical, electrochemical, and magnetic properties. In the following, several methods for the characterization of functional groups on nanomaterials, like polymer and silica nanoparticles, semiconductor quantum dots, and lanthanide-based upconversion nanocrystals are presented. Additionally, procedures for the measurement of the key spectroscopic performance parameters of nanomaterials with linear and nonlinear photoluminescence, such as the photoluminescence quantum yield, are presented for the UV/vis/NIR/SWIR.
Semiconductor nanocrystals with a spherical (QDs) core and a spherical or a rod-shaped Shell, u.a., so-called Quantum dot-Quantum rods (QDQRs) are increasingly used as fluorescent Reporters or optically active components in the life and material science, e.g., in solid state lightening including Plasma Displays. (1,2) Morever, there is an increasing interest in materials with emission >800 nm for bioanalysis, medical diagnostics, and safety barcodes. Prerequisites for the mechanistic understanding of nonradiativ decay channels needed for the rational design of improved nanomaterials and the comparison of material Performance are reliable fluorescence measurements and validated methods for the assessment of their surface chemistry. (3,4) The latter is of particular importance for nanocrystalline Emitters, where surface states and the accessibility of emissive states by quenchers largely control photoluminescence properties. (5) Here, we present results from systematic spectroscopic studies including absolutely measured photolumunescence Quantum yields of different vissible and NIR emisisve QD and QDQRs Systems of varying particle architecture size and surface chemistries in Dispersion and embedded in salt crystals. (6,7)
Due to their unique physical properties, particularly their electronic and luminescent properties, graphene quantum dots (GQDs) are expected to be suitable for a wide range of applications in bioimaging, electro-optical and photonic materials or energy harvesting among others.1 Tuning the surface chemistry provides an efficient approach to modulate the fluorescence and distinct electronic properties of GQDs.2 Nevertheless, the role of surface chemistry on the electronic structure of GQDs remains poorly understood. In this presentation, we will compare systematically the electronic and chemical structures of GQDs functionalized with carboxylic and aminated groups to those of non-functionalized GQDs, combining theoretical and experimental approaches, here various photon-based spectroscopies. First, the electronic structure of GQDs was characterized by soft X-ray absorption (XA) and X-ray emission (XE) spectroscopies, probing unoccupied and occupied electronic states, respectively, at the carbon K edge for the first time. The interpretation of the XA/XE spectra was done based on theoretical calculations. Then, the chemical structure of the GQDs was characterized in situ by ATR-FTIR in water, thereby accounting for the importance of the interface between GQDs and water believed to play a central role in the chemical reactivity and the optical properties. We previously demonstrated that monitoring the OH vibrations of water molecules during exposure to humid air was a powerful method to probe H-bonding environment around carbon nanomaterials.3 For GQDs, clear surface-dependent water adsorption profiles are observed and discussed. Finally, UV/Vis absorption and photoluminescence measurements were done to characterize the optical properties of these GQDs. Our results suggest that the surface chemistry of the GQDs affects significantly their electronic structure and optical properties. These findings will contribute to an improved understanding of the structure–activity relationship of GQDs and other carbon nanomaterials with surface modifications.