Refine
Language
- Albanian (14)
- Arabic (108)
- Bulgarian (160)
- Catalan (14)
- Czech (79)
- Danish (45)
- German (9422)
- Greek (74)
- English (17979)
- Estonian (1)
- Euskara, Basqe (2)
- Farsi, Persian (26)
- Finnish (103)
- French (737)
- Gujaritic (3)
- Hebrew (52)
- Serbocroatic (292)
- Hungarian (103)
- Indonesian (68)
- Icelandish (1)
- Italian (1348)
- Japanese (182)
- Korean (197)
- Kurdish (1)
- Latin (1)
- Latvian (28)
- Lithuanian (10)
- Macedonian (2)
- Mongolian (1)
- Burmese (1)
- Dutch (75)
- nll (1)
- Norwegian (53)
- Turkish (102)
- Polish (429)
- Portuguese (256)
- Romansh (2)
- Romany (16)
- Roumain, Moldave (15)
- Russian (214)
- ser (2)
- Slovakian (14)
- Slovenian (29)
- Spanish (1963)
- Albanian (1)
- Serbian (26)
- Swedish (53)
- Ukrainian (8)
- Vietnamese (10)
- Sorbian (2)
- Chinese (1951)
Document Type
- Articles (24879)
- Books (4651)
- Reviews (2507)
- Dissertations (1091)
- Excerpts (778)
- Collections (738)
- Forewords (440)
- Ebooks (383)
- Interviews (353)
- Necrologues (236)
Orientasi Karakter Perilaku Aktivis Mahasiswa [Character Orientation of Students Activst Behavior]
(2016)
Penelitian ini dilakukan berdasarkan adanya perilaku mahasiswa yang menarik diri dari lingkungan organisasi. Permasalahan yang diangkat oleh peneliti merupakan hasil tinjauan budaya dalam penyelenggaraan pendidikan politik di Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui, memahami dan memaknai dikotomi eksistensial Erich Fromm dalam membantu subyek mengatasi alienasi organisasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Subyek penelitian dipilih menggunakan teknik purposive sampling sejumlah tiga orang mahasiswa. Metode pengumpulan data menggunakan wawancara, observasi partisipan, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data menggunakan reduksi data, display data, lalu kesimpulan. Uji keabsahan data menggunakan teknik triangulasi data, yaitu triangulasi sumber dan metode. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa subyek AS dan ANU menggunakan orientasi karakter produktif dengan persentase sebesar 45,32 dan 22,37. Sedangkan subyek KJ menggunakan orientasi karakter nonproduktif dengan persentase sebesar -1,47.
이 글은 1960∼1970년대 한국의 지식(문화)장에서 실현된 소외의 담론정치를 냉전의 지식문화사라는 계보 속에서 읽어내고자 한다. 프랑크푸르트학파의 담론이 파편적이고도, 편의적으로 재단되어 수용되었던 한국 지식장의 사회문화적 맥락을 검토하고, 그 가운데에서 특히 프롬과 마르쿠제의 소외론이 냉전체제 아래에서 비판적 지식인들에게 어떻게 전유되는지를 살펴본다. 또한 크리스찬아카데미의 『대화』를 통해 진보적 기독교 지식인들이 >인간화<라는 주제 아래 소외개념을 변용·확산시키는 과정과, 그들이 소외의 현장과 긴밀하게 접속됨으로써 반체제 인권운동으로 달려가는 상황도 분석한다. 또한 문학 영역의 소외론이 예술의 자율성을 둘러싼 오래된 논쟁으로 진영화하는 양상을 검토한다. 이러한 과정을 통해 냉전질서 속에서 산업화를 진행하였던 1960∼1970년대 한국 담론 장에서, 과연 소외론이 >저항담론<으로서 지식사회의 의식적 각성에 기여하였는지, 혹은 궁극적으로 대중사회·산업사회를 절대화하는 >위장된 저항담론<으로 기능하였는지를 가늠해 본다.
O Socialismo É Um Humanismo
(1976)
Il socialismo è un umanesimo
(1971)
El socialismo como humanismo
(1968)
The aim of this article is to rethink the authority in education tentatively. For this purpose, this article pays attention to a conception called >rational authority<, which was presented by Erich Fromm (1900-80), who was famous sociopsychologist in the 20th century. Many studies of pedagogy or educational science have emphasized the need of the authority in education. But most of them tend to discuss a desirable quantity of the authority and do not fully have qualitative discrimination of the authority in educational fields. However, Erich Fromm's thoughts on authority seem to have potentiality for that qualitative discrimination. According to Fromm's early texts, especially in Escape from Freedom (1941) and Man for Himself (1947), >rational authority< have four characteristics. That is, 1) >rational authority< is ruled by the elements of love, admiration and gratitude, 2) it can become the model of the identification generally or partially, 3) the authority has its source in competence, and 4) it is always temporary. It is certain that these characteristics are rather abstractive, but in considering works of his latter period, the dynamics between >rational authority< and >inhibiting authority< is suggested. This dynamism hints for the possibility of rethinking of the authority in education.
本稿の目的は、エーリッヒ・フロムの「自己実現」論を再構成し、その人間形成論的な可能性を提示することである。フロムはしばしば社会および人間を二つの位相に分けたうえで、片方を持ち上げてもう片方を非難するという論法を採用したが、従来それらは素朴な勧善懲悪的図式として理解される傾向にあった。だがその遺稿から明らかになったフロムによる初期マルクスへの直接的な参照は、そうしたフロムの方法論が決して単純な善悪二元論にはおさまらないことを示唆している。マルクスの言う私有財産の「止揚」プロセスとフロムの想定したこつの様式観が交わりあう過程とをそれぞれのテクストにより突き合わせていくことで、フロムの「自己実現」論は、発達の脱中心化を志向する近年の教育人間学的なモメントを理論レベルにおいて批判的に彫琢しうる、他とのつながりに開かれながらも「自己」へと再帰的に準拠する人間形成論として、新たに定位される。
The reunification of Germany took place in 1990. As an analyst brought up in the former West Germany, but practicing in Berlin, I have observed over and over again that patients who come from what used to be East Germany (German Democratic Republic) – even those born after 1990 – have a strong need to distinguish between East Germans and West Germans. In their minds, Germany seems still to be a divided country. A split identity appears to have been internalized, producing >West German< and >East German< racists who despise, in the >other< kind of German, a devalued aspect of what being German means. I have tried for many years to understand the hidden meanings of this defensive maneuver for the analytic couple, and beyond this for the relation between the East and West German societies. Here I discuss these unresolved shadows in German identity. Analyses in Germany may be dominated by the splits they provoke, which interfere with patients’ capacities to think. Patients may relate instead to a >German< object that is impersonal, nonempathic, and rejects the idea of an independent internal world. The defensive use of this object in the transference has to be continually worked through in the analysis.
Arbeiter und Angestellte am Vorabend des Dritten Reiches. Eine sozialpsychologische Untersuchung.
(2006)
Prefazione
(1984)
Nach diesem (eklektisch bleibenden) ideengeschichtlichen Überblick widmet sich das folgende Kapitel der Frage, wie ein humanistischer Produktivitätsbegriff aussehen könnte, der das Subjekt und dessen Selbst- und Weltbezug ins Zentrum stellt. Zu diesem Zweck soll in Kapitel drei auf die Theorien Erich Fromms und Hartmut Rosas zurückgegriffen werden, bevor in Kapitel vier Kriterien für einen humanistischen Produktivitätsbegriff definiert werden. Der Auswahl der Autoren liegt die These zugrunde, dass beide die Frage nach produktiver Selbstwerdung neu stellen und diese an der lebensweltlichen Erfahrung spiegeln.