Refine
Language
- Japanese (182) (remove)
Document Type
- Articles (116)
- Books (43)
- Collections (8)
- Forewords (5)
- Dissertations (4)
- Interviews (3)
- Reviews (3)
Man and Freedom (Japanese)
(1967)
The purpose of this study was to analyze problems related to the mechanism whereby students can accept corporal punishment during extracurricular sports activities with reference to the books Escape from Freedom and Man for Himself that were central to Erich Fromm's authority theory. Specifically, the author focused on the concepts of >authoritarian character,< >authoritarian ethics,< and >authoritarian conscience.< Fromm pointed out that anxiety prompted Germany's citizens to give up their freedom in order to obey authoritarian powers such as Hitler and the Nazis. Students taking part in extracurricular sports activities were considered from the viewpoint of Fromm's authority theory. It was revealed that students comply with a leader's authority in order to relieve anxiety, and have positive thoughts about corporal punishment. Furthermore, it was found that such acceptance of corporal punishment succeeded in eliminating conspicuous suffering, but not in removing any underlying conflicts. Fromm pointed that fear of anxiety was relieved by spontaneous activity. To achieve spontaneous activity by students, it was suggested that some form of measure that does not create the type of partnership that occurred between Germany's citizens and Hitler would be desirable for any relationship between the leader of extracurricular sports activities and the students.
エーリッヒ・フロムは、フランクフルト社会研究所在籍時に、権威主義に対する批判的考察を行っている。この考察は、フロム独自の自我理論と疎外‐ 物象化論として把握可能である。この権威主義研究の際、フロムはフロイト自我理論への批判を、フロイトの概念である超自我、自我、エスという自我三層構造論を踏襲しながら行っている。自我が弱い時、彼は、「内部世界と外部世界」を生活充足の対象とする人格的課題を、超自我が担うことを認めている。しかしこの時、超自我が精神を支配し、この過程内で抑圧という心的機制が生じる。この抑圧によって自己は消耗し、自我の能動的行為編成機能と現実検証機能が低下するのである。そして、この超自我は権威との相互的な再帰的構造化過程を形成する。超自我は、自己の精神的エネルギーを権威対象へ投影する。さらに投影、備給された精神的エネルギーが、権威の命令を内化することによって、超自我に回帰していく。この諸過程によって、権威への合理的批判は抑制され、自我機能の低下が起こる。さらに、これは社会的相互作用として成立しているため、社会文化領域での物象化が生じるのである。最終的に、この超自我による物象化‐ 疎外現象は、次の四つの具体的事象へと帰結する。それは①精神的なエネルギーの譲渡=疎外、②自己関係の疎外、③自己による自己産出過程の物象化された超自我と権威への譲渡=疎外、④自己関係内部にある、権威対象以外の他者からの疎外である。
[I] Oedipus Complex A. (1) The outline of King Oedipus by Sophocles. (2) Oedipus did not know the murder of his father by himself, and succeeded to the father's throne, making his mother his own >Qeen< without any knowledge of the truth of these facts, and without never falling in love with his mother. It is only the destiny of the oracle by Apollo. As the resulting disaster in his despair, he forced to make himself blind, exiled out of his ruling country. >The myth can be understood as a symbol not of the incestuous love between mother and son but of the rebellion of the son against the authority of the father in the partriarchal family; that the marriage of Oedipus and Jocasta is only a secondary element, only one of the symbols of the victory of the son, who takes his father's place with it all his privileges.< (The Forgotten Language by Fromm, p. 202). B. Antigone by Sophocles. (Conscious Oedipus complex between father and son). [II] Electra Complex (Chiefly through My Mother-My Self by Nancy Friday) with the daughter's envy, and jealousy of her mother, (attached to the closeness to and the symbiosis to the mother), the girl wants to be loved by her father, taking the place of her mother. Father must love his daughter with his wife in love.