Refine
Language
- Serbian (1) (remove)
Document Type
- Articles (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (1)
Year of publication
- 2001 (1)
The main subject of this paper is a comparative analysis of two theoretical presentations of deviance: structurally-functionalistic against the socio-antrophological and the establishment of the main points of theoretical differences. These theories are the crucial and most influential understandings of social deviance with all the characteristics of different and >rival< scientific paradigms within the deviance sociology. The starting point is that the comparative analysis of the understanding of the society, man and the individual-society relation presents the foundation stone for noticing essential differences which there are between the structurally functionalistic and socio-antrophological understandings of social deviance. The following issues are further topics of study: definition of what is socially normal; definition of what is socially deviant; criteria for telling deviant from normal- establishment of the point of view concerning the social deviance phenomenon- recognition of basic types of indicators of social deviance; understanding the causes of social deviance; understanding the character of social reaction to deviations and recognition of joint characteristics and scientific preoccupations of these theoretical paradigms. The main authors whose ideas are being analyzed are Talkot Parsons and Robert Merton for the structurally-functionalistic that is Erich Fromm for socio-antrophological theory.