• search hit 23 of 573
Back to Result List

Commentary on paper by Jody Messier Davies

  • Whenever the subject is explicitly addressed, all analysts agree that empathic perception is an attitude one takes toward making observations, not a privileged means of perception. Furthermore, analysts seem to agree that observations made with an empathic intention are interpretations like any other observations. Empathy is not a conduit to the patient's inner life. But despite these points of consensus, it often seems to be implied in the psychoanalytic literature, usually unintentionally, that empathy is a privileged means of knowing another person. This undercurrent is sometimes present even in the work of theorists who simultaneously state their opposition to this very point of view. In this paper, after presenting an example from the literature of this kind of contradiction, I, basing my argument in hermeneutics, offer the view that all observation, inside and outside psychoanalysis, is interpretation. Then, turning to the three papers of the symposium individually, I take the perspective that in one way or another they all portray empathic perception as a privileged means of observation. These portrayals are examples of the unconscious politics of theory.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Donnel B. Stern
Parent Title (English):Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 04 (1994), pp. 441-471.
Document Type:Articles
Language:English
Year of first Publication:1994
Release Date:2017/11/20
Format:xerox upon request / Fotokopie auf Anfrage
IdNo:Stern_D_B_1994a
Erich Fromm's Library and Erich Fromm Archive:Articles / Artikel
Licence (German):
Einverstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.