• search hit 2 of 3
Back to Result List

Appreciation of Fromm’s Aesthetic Liberation of the Mind 论弗洛姆的审美解放思想, Chinese Language and Literature, Master thesis, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan, China 2016 [application of Fromm's theories to art].

  • 弗洛姆作为20世纪著名的精神分析学家、伦理学家和哲学家,运用马克思主义的社会批判理论对弗洛伊德的精神分析学进行了改造和革新,不仅使马克思的理论弥久常新,同时也为心理学领域作出了巨大的贡献。弗洛姆的一生理论建树颇丰,其中最值得一提的就是其审美解放思想。弗洛姆生活在一个审美生活缺失的时代,其主要表现是:审美情感的压抑、审美理解的缺失、审美自由的丧失和审美态度的偏离等方面。针对所处的生活时代,弗洛姆提出了五条审美解放的途径:>激发创发性力量<的解放途径、>满足精神需要<的解放途径、>象征表达人类内在经验<的解放途径、>技术人性化<的解放途径、>解除社会无意识压抑<的解放途径等。弗洛姆的审美解放思想继承和发展了马克思主义和弗洛伊德理论。关于对马克思主义理论的发展,主要体现在对马克思历史唯物主义的延续、人学思想的扩充、异化思想的发展等方面;关于对弗洛伊德理论的革新,主要体现在对弗洛伊德无意识理论和性格理论改造等方面。弗洛姆的审美解放思想和马尔库塞的审美解放思想既有相同点也有不同处。相同点主要表现为二者都以人为中心,思考人的自由问题;不同处在于马尔库塞将人的解放立足于艺术审美,弗洛姆则偏重于从社会领域和心理领域对人进行全方位的革新。弗洛姆的审美解放思想把人放在社会中进行研究,深度挖掘了人的内在心理真实,对人学研究具有非常大的贡献。但弗洛姆的审美解放思想缺乏实践性,尤其表现在他提出的审美解放途径上,如果偏离人的物质性,偏离人的经济、社会、历史的解放,只一味的对人的内在心理真实进行挖掘,对人的内在精神进行革新,势必最终陷入了>语言的牢笼<。
  • As the famous psychoanalyst, philosopher and aestheticist of the 20th century, Fromm reformed the Freud’s psychoanalysis by applying the Marxist theory of social criticism. It not only makes Marx’s theory keeping pace with the times, but also contributes a lot to the field of psychology. Fromm got quite good achievements in theory period, the most noteworthy is its aesthetic liberation. Fromm lived in an era which the aesthetic life is missing, and its main manifestations are: a esthetic emotion of depression, lack of understanding of the aesthetic, aesthetic and other aspects of deviation from the loss of freedom and aesthetic attitudes. In view of the era of life, Fromm proposes five ways to aesthetic liberation: >The Year of the excitation of power<, >to meet the spiritual needs<, >symbolic expression of the human inner experience<, >technical humane<, >Release the repressed unconscious social<. Fromm’s aesthetic liberation is the inheritance and development of Marxism and Freudian theory. With regard to the development of Marxist theory, it mainly reflected in the continuation of Marxist historical materialism, the expand of humanistic thoughts, the development of alienation of thought; on Freudian theory of innovation, it mainly reflected in Freud’s unconscious theory and personality theory transformation and so on. There are similarities and differences in Fromm’ and Marcuse’ aesthetic liberation. The similarity is they both are people-centered, thinking human freedom; the difference is that Marcuse human emancipation based on aesthetic, when Fromm is emphasis on the full range of human innovation in the field of social and psychology field. Fromm’s aesthetic Liberation places the human in society to excavate the person’s inner psychological truth deeply, which makes a very large contribution in man-problem-study. But Fromm’s aesthetic liberation lack practicality, especially in the way he raised aesthetic liberation, if people deviate from the materiality of deviation from human economic, social, historical liberation, but just on the person’s inner psychological truth excavation of the inner spirit to innovate, is bound to end up in the >language of the cage>. [Author’s translation]

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Mo Li
Document Type:Dissertations
Language:Chinese
Year of first Publication:2016
Release Date:2017/11/20
Format:no download and copy possible
IdNo:Li_Mo_2016
Writings about Erich Fromm (Secondary Literature):Dissertations / Dissertationen
Erich Fromm's Library and Erich Fromm Archive:Dissertations / Dissertationen
Licence (German):
Einverstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.