ZIB-Report
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- ZIB-Report (16)
Sprache
- Englisch (16)
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (16)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- nein (16)
Schlagworte
- perfect graphs (6)
- stable set polytope (6)
- critical edges (3)
- (non-)rank facet (2)
- critically perfect graphs (2)
- imperfection ratio (2)
- perfect graph (2)
- rank-perfect graph (2)
- web (2)
- Bandwidth allocation (1)
Institut
- ZIB Allgemein (15)
- Mathematical Optimization (1)
00-49
We call an edge $e$ of a perfect graph $G$ critical if $G-e$ is imperfect and say further that $e$ is anticritical with respect to the complementary graph $\overline G$. We ask in which perfect graphs critical and anticritical edges occur and how to find critical and anticritical edges in perfect graphs. Finally, we study whether we can order the edges of certain perfect graphs such that deleting all the edges yields a sequence of perfect graphs ending up with a stable set.
02-07
Antiwebs are Rank-Perfect
(2002)
\We discuss a nested collection of three superclasses of perfect graphs: near-perfect, rank-perfect, and weakly rank-perfect graphs. For that, we start with the description of the stable set polytope for perfect graphs and allow stepwise more general facets for the stable set polytopes of the graphs in each superclass. Membership in those three classes indicates how far a graph is away from being perfect. We investigate for webs and antiwebs to which of the three classes they belong. We provide a complete description of the facets of the stable set polytope for antiwebs (with help of a result due to Shepherd on near-bipartite graphs). The main result is that antiwebs are rankperfect.
01-18
An edge of a perfect graph $G$ is critical if $G-e$ is imperfect. We would like to decide whether $G - e$ is still {\sl almost perfect} or already {\sl very imperfect}. Via relaxations of the stable set polytope of a graph, we define two superclasses of perfect graphs: rank-perfect and weakly rank-perfect graphs. Membership in those two classes indicates how far an imperfect graph is away from being perfect. We study the cases, when a critical edge is removed from the line graph of a bipartite graph or from the complement of such a graph.
00-29
We focus on two new types of extremal graphs with respect to perfectness: critically and anticritically perfect graphs that lose their perfectness by simply deleting and adding an arbitrary edge, respectively. We present examples and study properties in order to compare critically and anticritically perfect graphs with minimally imperfect graphs, another type of extremal graphs with respect to perfectness. We discuss two attempts to characterize the classes of all critically and anticritically perfect graphs and give a brief overview on classes of perfect graphs which contain critically or anticritically perfect graphs.
02-03
For all perfect graphs, the stable set polytope STAB$(G)$ coincides with the fractional stable set polytope QSTAB$(G)$, whereas STAB$(G) \subset$ QSTAB$(G)$ holds iff $G$ is imperfect. Padberg asked in the early seventies for ``almost'' perfect graphs. He characterized those graphs for which the difference between STAB$(G)$ and QSTAB$(G)$ is smallest possible. We develop this idea further and define three polytopes between STAB$(G)$ and QSTAB$(G)$ by allowing certain sets of cutting planes only to cut off all the fractional vertices of QSTAB$(G)$. The difference between QSTAB$(G)$ and the largest of the three polytopes coinciding with STAB$(G)$ gives some information on the stage of imperfectness of the graph~$G$. We obtain a nested collection of three superclasses of perfect graphs and survey which graphs are known to belong to one of those three superclasses. This answers the question: which graphs are ``almost'' perfect?
03-22
We call an edge $e$ of a perfect graph $G$ critical if $G-e$ is imperfect and call $e$ anticritical if $G+e$ is imperfect. The present paper surveys several questions in this context. We ask in which perfect graphs critical and anticritical edges occur and how to detect such edges. The main result by [{\sl Wagler, PhD thesis 2000}] shows that a graph does not admit any critical edge if and only if it is Meyniel. The goal is to order the edges resp.~non-edges of certain perfect graphs s.t. deleting resp.~adding all edges in this order yields a sequence of perfect graphs only. Results of [{\sl Hayward 1985}] and [{\sl Spinrad & Sritharan 1995}] show the existence of such edge orders for weakly triangulated graphs; the line-perfect graphs are precisely these graphs where all edge orders are perfect [{\sl Wagler 2001}]. Such edge orders cannot exist for every subclass of perfect graphs that contains critically resp.~anticritically perfect graphs where deleting resp.~adding an arbitrary edge yields an imperfect graph. We present several examples and properties of such graphs, discuss constructions and characterizations from [{\sl Wagler 1999, Wagler PhD thesis 2000}]. An application of the concept of critically and anticritically perfect graphs is a result due to [{\sl Hougardy & Wagler 2002}] showing that perfectness is an elusive graph property.
04-06
Normal graphs are defined in terms of cross-intersecting set families: a graph is normal if it admits a clique cover $\cal Q$ and a stable set cover $\cal S$ s.t.~every clique in $\cal Q$ intersects every stable set in $\cal S$. Normal graphs can be considered as closure of perfect graphs by means of co-normal products (Körner 1973) and graph entropy (Czisz\'ar et al. 1990). Perfect graphs have been recently characterized as those graphs without odd holes and odd antiholes as induced subgraphs (Strong Perfect Graph Theorem, Chudnovsky et al. 2002). Körner and de Simone observed that $C_5$, $C_7$, and $\overline C_7$ are minimal not normal and conjectured, as generalization of the Strong Perfect Graph Theorem, that every $C_5$, $C_7$, $\overline C_7$- free graph is normal (Normal Graph Conjecture, Körner and de Simone 1999). We prove this conjecture for a first class of graphs that generalize both odd holes and odd antiholes, the circulants, by characterizing all the normal circulants.
SC-97-46
SC-96-50
On Critically Perfect Graphs
(1996)
A perfect graph is critical if the deletion of any edge results in an imperfect graph. We give examples of such graphs and prove some basic properties. We investigate the relationship of critically perfect graphs to well-known classes of perfect graphs and study operations preserving critical perfectness.
SC-97-28
A graph $G$ is called preperfect if each induced subgraph $G' \subseteq G$ of order at least 2 has two vertices $x,y$ such that either all maximum cliques of $G'$ containing $x$ contain $y$, or all maximum indepentent sets of $G'$ containing $y$ contain $x$, too. Giving a partial answer to a problem of Hammer and Maffray [Combinatorica 13 (1993), 199-208], we describe new classes of minimally non-preperfect graphs, and prove the following characterizations: \begin{itemize} \item[(i)] A graph of maximum degree 4 is minimally non-preperfect if and only if it is an odd cycle of length at least 5, or the complement of a cycle of length 7, or the line graph of a 3-regular 3-connected bipartite graph. \item[(ii)] If a graph $G$ is not an odd cycle and has no isolated vertices, then its line graph is minimally non-preperfect if and only if $G$ is bipartite, 3-edge-connected, regular of degree $d$ for some $d \ge 3$, and contains no 3-edge-connected $d'$-regular subgraph for any $3 \le d' \le d$. \end{itemize}