• search hit 3 of 31
Back to Result List

Umgang mit der Komplexität naturschutzrelevanter Großprojekte

  • Großprojekte der Verkehrsinfrastruktur sind komplex und beeinflussen Schutzgüter in hohem Maße; sie besitzen somit in aller Regel eine starke Relevanz für Ziele des Naturschutzes. Die Komplexität hat zur Folge, dass planerische Entscheidungen unter hohen Risiken und nicht dergestalt abgewogen werden, wie dies u.a. gemäß dem Gesetz über die Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung (UVPG) erforderlich ist. Die vorliegende Dissertation geht der Frage nach, wie mit dieser Komplexität umgegangen werden kann, umGroßprojekte der Verkehrsinfrastruktur sind komplex und beeinflussen Schutzgüter in hohem Maße; sie besitzen somit in aller Regel eine starke Relevanz für Ziele des Naturschutzes. Die Komplexität hat zur Folge, dass planerische Entscheidungen unter hohen Risiken und nicht dergestalt abgewogen werden, wie dies u.a. gemäß dem Gesetz über die Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung (UVPG) erforderlich ist. Die vorliegende Dissertation geht der Frage nach, wie mit dieser Komplexität umgegangen werden kann, um den Erfolg der Vorhaben zu optimieren.show moreshow less
  • Major transport infrastructure projects are complex and have .a high impact on protected assets; they are therefore generally highly relevant to nature conservation objectives. As a consequence of this complexity, planning decisions are made under high risks and are not weighed up in the way required by the Environmental Impact Assessment Act (UVPG). This dissertation addresses the question of how this complexity can be dealt with in order to optimize the success of projects. For this purpose, aMajor transport infrastructure projects are complex and have .a high impact on protected assets; they are therefore generally highly relevant to nature conservation objectives. As a consequence of this complexity, planning decisions are made under high risks and are not weighed up in the way required by the Environmental Impact Assessment Act (UVPG). This dissertation addresses the question of how this complexity can be dealt with in order to optimize the success of projects. For this purpose, a situation analysis as part of the problem-solving cycle according to . HABERFELLNER (2012) is conducted in Paper 1. Based on a functional analysis, the question what contribution systemic thinking can make to optimizing planning processes is explored. This requires, among other things, a preoccupation with systems and their properties from different perspectives. Furthermore, the dynamic complexity of the system is evaluated. With the consequence of a necessary change of perspective in planning practice, suggestions are derived to deal with this complexity better than before. Paper 2 takes up the proposal from Paper 1 to investigate possibilities to determine the success of the transformation of the overall system road and landscape by road construction. In addition to a theory-based exploration of the concepts of goal and success, the influence of the numerous stakeholders in the context of transport infrastructure proje,cts on the goal system and its success is explored. Furthermore, the influence of the degree of knowledge about the circumstances on decisions in the planning process is explored. This is supplemented by considerations of the morality of planning actions in the field of tension between diverging interests of the actors. The results are used to develop a model for determining success in transforming the road and landscape system in the context of multistakeholder projects. In Paper 3, the decomposition method, another essential element of the proposed change of perspective, is processed and applied to the transformation of the road and landscape system. The analysis of the planning processes focuses on the phase of preliminary planning, since this phase, with the line determination, most clearly determines the influences on the protected assets, and on the implementation of a retrospective legal impact assessment of Section 2 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Act (UVPG). Finally, the entities representing the overall system are identified in order to transform them into a mathematical model. A case study of the planned bypass Els'torf in the district of Harburg is in the center of Paper 4. In this paper, it is examined to what extent modeling and simulation can provide indications of a behavior of the overall system, which cannot be represented by the consideration of sectoral parts. From the content analysis of the environmental compatibility study of the project, a qualitative ecosystem submodel is created, from the results of a Delphi study on goals, problems and causes in transport infrastructure projects, a qualitative socio-economic submodel is created. Both submodels will be coupled and analyzed to a qualitative model of the Eistorf bypass. As an example, a subsystem is transformed into a mathematical subrhodel capable of simulation and examined for possible instability points and bifurcation points. Recommendations for action derived from the results show a way t6 deal with the complexity.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Thomas Muschkullus
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:2083-664
ISBN:13978-3-934742-90-1
Series (Serial Number):Geisenheimer Berichte (98)
Publisher:Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Hochschule Geisenheim
Place of publication:Geisenheim
Referee:Eckhard Jedicke, Wolfgang Dickhaut, Volker Blees
Advisor:Eckhard Jedicke
Document Type:Doctoral Thesis
Language:German
Year of Completion:2023
Embargo Date:2023/10/01
Publishing Institution:Hochschule Geisenheim University
Granting Institution:Hochschule Geisenheim University
Date of final exam:2022/12/09
Release Date:2024/01/30
Tag:Großprojekte; Infrastruktur; Komplexität; Naturschutz
Volume:2023
Edition:1. Auflage
Page Number:507
Note:
Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde am 9. Dezember 2022 von der Hochschule Geisenheim als Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Doktor-Ingenieur (Dr.-lng.) angenommen. Die Verleihung des akademischen Grades richtet sich nach der institutionellen Zuordnung des zweiten Gutachters, der dem Fachbereich Umweltgerechter Stadt- und lnfrastrukturplanung der HafenCity Universität Hamburg (HCU) angehört.
Institutes:Landschaftsplanung und Naturschutz
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 62 Ingenieurwissenschaften
Licence (German):License LogoKeine Nutzungslizenz vergeben - es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht