FG VWL, insbesondere Mikroökonomik
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Scientific journal article peer-reviewed (60) (remove)
Way of publication
- Open Access (2)
Keywords
- Inequality (3)
- Economic policy (2)
- Fiscal federalism (2)
- Formal institutions (2)
- Informal institutions (2)
- Paternalismus (2)
- Redistribution (2)
- Social norms (2)
- Tax evasion (2)
- Tax morale (2)
- collective learning (2)
- Academic journals (1)
- Ancient Athens (1)
- Anti-terrorism policies (1)
- Behavioral political economics (1)
- Behavioral political economy (1)
- Brinkmanship (1)
- Bryce Law (1)
- Centralisation (1)
- Centralization (1)
- Civil war (1)
- Classical liberalism (1)
- Cognitive biases (1)
- Cognitive dissonance (1)
- Collective beliefs (1)
- Collective learning (1)
- Constitutional economics (1)
- Corruption (1)
- Creative destruction (1)
- Crisis management (1)
- Cultural evolution (1)
- Darwinism (1)
- Deterrence (1)
- Diffusion of innovations (1)
- Direct democracy (1)
- Electoral systems (1)
- Evolution (1)
- Expressive behavior (1)
- Fairness (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Fiscal decentralization (1)
- Fiscal referendums (1)
- Government Centralization (1)
- Grants in aid (1)
- Greek debt crisis (1)
- H26 (1)
- Happiness (1)
- Inclusive institutions (1)
- Income distribution (1)
- Industriepolitik (1)
- Innovation (1)
- Innovation Policy (1)
- Innovationspolitik (1)
- Institutional Evolution (1)
- Institutional evolution (1)
- Intra-elite competition (1)
- Justice (1)
- Knowledge spillovers (1)
- Libertarian paternalism (1)
- Life satisfaction (1)
- Model uncertainty (1)
- National Champions (1)
- Nationale Industriestrategie (1)
- Ordnungsökonomik (1)
- Organized crime (1)
- Paternalism (1)
- Peer review policy (1)
- Policy decentralisation (1)
- Political apathy (1)
- Political ideology (1)
- Political non-neutrality (1)
- Popitz Law (1)
- Presidential and parliamentary regimes (1)
- Property rights (1)
- Public good provision (1)
- Public security (1)
- Rational irrationality (1)
- Reciprocity (1)
- Regional growth (1)
- Rent seeking (1)
- Representative democracy (1)
- Research and development (1)
- Schumpeterian political economy (1)
- Scientific publishing (1)
- Soft paternalism (1)
- Solon (1)
- Sour grapes (1)
- State and Local Autonomy (1)
- Structural Change (1)
- Structural change (1)
- Strukturwandel (1)
- Subjective well-being (1)
- Terrorism (1)
- Verhaltensökonomik (1)
- Voting (1)
- World Values Survey (1)
- Z13 (1)
- autocracies (1)
- economic performance (1)
- economics and psychology (1)
- expressives Verhalten (1)
- fiscal competition (1)
- fiscal decentralization (1)
- fiscal federalism (1)
- growth (1)
- inequality (1)
- inkonsistente Präferenzen (1)
- military spending (1)
- model uncertainty (1)
- nationale Champions (1)
- net wealth tax (1)
- path-dependent rule-evolution (1)
- political innovation (1)
- political legitimacy (1)
- positive constitutional economics (1)
- public entrepreneurship (1)
- redistribution (1)
- reform processes (1)
- rent-seeking (1)
- wealth (1)
Institute
- FG VWL, insbesondere Mikroökonomik (60) (remove)
With its foundation in 1945, UNESCO declared as its main purpose the promotion of international cultural exchange1. A number of legal instruments (Conventions, Recommendations and Declarations) should duly help to substantiate that general purpose and make it work in practice. In this process, the regulation of the international exchange of cultural property plays a key role. However, the proper regulation of cultural property exchange has been a highly controversial issue. This paper focus on UNESCO's guiding ideas and conceptions of cultural property, international exchange and regulation. The central question is: Are the regulations codified in UNESCO’s Conventions and Recommendations helpful in encouraging international cultural exchange or are we faced, due to the neglect of private agents and the roles they play in cultural exchange, with some sort of one-sided regulation running counter to that aim? The author argues that UNESCO's legal instruments are driven by and express a strong anti-private and anti-market bias, which produce problematic economic incentives in the art and antiquities world to the disadvantage of the international exchange of cultural property.