Trassenbörse
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- In Proceedings (12)
- ZIB-Report (11)
- Article (7)
- Book (2)
- Habilitation (1)
- Proceedings (1)
Language
- English (34)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (34)
Keywords
Institute
This book promotes the use of mathematical optimization and operations research methods in rail transportation. The editors assembled thirteen contributions from leading scholars to present a unified voice, standardize terminology, and assess the state-of-the-art.
There are three main clusters of articles, corresponding to the classical stages of the planning process: strategic, tactical, and operational. These three clusters are further subdivided into five parts which correspond to the main phases of the railway network planning process: network assessment, capacity planning, timetabling, resource planning, and operational planning. Individual chapters cover:
Simulation
Capacity Assessment
Network Design
Train Routing
Robust Timetabling
Event Scheduling
Track Allocation
Blocking
Shunting
Rolling Stock
Crew Scheduling
Dispatching
Delay Propagation
Running and optimizing transportation systems give rise to very complex and large-scale optimization problems requiring innovative solution techniques and ideas from mathematical optimization, theoretical computer science, and operations research. Since 2000, the series of Algorithmic Approaches for Transportation Modelling, Optimization, and Systems (ATMOS) workshops brings together researchers and practitioners who are interested in all aspects of algorithmic methods and models for transportation optimization and provides a forum for the exchange and dissemination of new ideas and techniques. The scope of ATMOS comprises all modes of transportation.
The 18th ATMOS workshop (ATMOS’18) was held in connection with ALGO’18 and hosted by Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland, on August 23–24, 2018. Topics of interest were all optimization problems for passenger and freight transport, including, but not limited to, demand forecasting, models for user behavior, design of pricing systems, infrastructure planning, multi-modal transport optimization, mobile applications for transport, congestion modelling and reduction, line planning, timetable generation, routing and platform assignment, vehicle scheduling, route planning, crew and duty scheduling, rostering, delay management, routing in road networks, traffic guidance, and electro mobility. Of particular interest were papers applying and advancing techniques like graph and network algorithms, combinatorial optimization, mathematical programming, approximation algorithms, methods for the integration of planning stages, stochastic and robust optimization, online and real-time algorithms, algorithmic game theory, heuristics for real-world instances, and simulation tools.
There were twenty-nine submissions from eighteen countries. All of them were reviewed by at least three referees in ninety-one reviews, among them five external ones, and judged on their originality, technical quality, and relevance to the topics of the workshop. Based on the reviews, the program committee selected sixteen submissions to be presented at the workshop (acceptance rate: 55%), which are collected in this volume in the order in which they were presented. Together, they quite impressively demonstrate the range of applicability of algorithmic optimization to transportation problems in a wide sense. In addition, Dennis Huisman kindly agreed to complement the program with an invited talk on Railway Disruption Management: State-of-the-art in practice and new research directions. Based on the reviews, Ralf Borndörfer, Marika Karbstein, Christian Liebchen, and Niels Lindner won the Best Paper Award of ATMOS’18 with their paper A simple way to compute the number of vehicles that Are required to operate a periodic timetable. In addition, we awarded Tomas Lidén the Best VGI Paper Award of ATMOS’18 for his paper Reformulations for railway traffic and maintenance planning.
We would like to thank the members of the Steering Committee of ATMOS for giving us the opportunity to serve as Program Chairs of ATMOS’18, all the authors who submitted papers, Dennis Huisman for accepting our invitation to present an invited talk, the members of the Program Committee and the additional reviewers for their valuable work in selecting the papers appearing in this volume, our sponsors MODAL, TomTom, and VGIscience for their support of the prizes, and the local organizers for hosting the workshop as part of ALGO’18. We acknowledge the use of the EasyChair system for the great help in managing the submission and review processes, and Schloss Dagstuhl for publishing the proceedings of ATMOS’18 in its OASIcs series.
The task of the train timetabling problem or track allocation problem is to find conflict free schedules for a set of trains with predefined routes in a railway network. Especially for non-periodic instances models based on time expanded networks are often used. Unfortunately, the linear programming relaxation of these models is often extremely weak because these models do not describe combinatorial relations like overtaking possibilities very well. In this paper we extend the model by so called connected configuration subproblems. These subproblems perfectly describe feasible schedules of a small subset of trains (2-3) on consecutive track segments. In a Lagrangian relaxation approach we solve several of these subproblems together in order to produce solutions which consist of combinatorially compatible schedules along the track segments. The computational results on a mostly single track corridor taken from the INFORMS RAS Problem Solving Competition 2012 data indicate that our new solution approach is rather strong. Indeed, for this instance the solution of the Lagrangian relaxation is already integral.
Railway transportation and in particular train timetabling is one of the basic and source application areas of combinatorial optimization and integer programming. We will discuss two well established modeling techniques for the train timetabling problem. In this paper we focus on one major ingredient - the bounding by dual relaxations. We compare two classical dual relaxations of large scale time expanded train timetabling problems - the Lagrangean Dual and Lagrangean Decomposition. We discuss the convergence behavior and show limitations of the Lagrangean Decomposition approach for a configuration based model. We introduce a third dualization approach to overcome those limitations. Finally, we present promising preliminary computational experiments that show that our new approach indeed has superior convergence properties.
Railway transportation and in particular train timetabling is one of the basic and source application areas of combinatorial optimization and integer programming. We will discuss two well established modeling techniques for the train timetabling problem. In this paper we focus on one major ingredient - the bounding by dual relaxations. We compare two classical dual relaxations of large scale time expanded train timetabling problems - the Lagrangean Dual and Lagrangean Decomposition. We discuss the convergence behavior and show limitations of the Lagrangean Decomposition approach for a configuration based model. We introduce a third dualization approach to overcome those limitations. Finally, we present promising preliminary computational experiments that show that our new approach indeed has superior convergence properties.
A common technique in the solution of large or complex optimization problems is the use of micro–macro transformations. In this paper, we carry out a theoretical analysis of such transformations for the track allocation problem in railway networks. We prove that the cumulative rounding technique of Schlechte et al. satisfies two of three natural optimality criteria and that this performance cannot be improved. We also show that under extreme circumstances, this technique can perform inconveniently by underestimating the global optimal value.
Railway Track Allocation
(2012)
Rapid Branching
(2013)
We propose rapid branching (RB) as a general branch-and-bound heuristic for solving large scale optimization problems in traffic and transport. The key idea is to combine a special branching rule and a greedy node selection strategy in order to produce solutions of controlled quality rapidly and efficiently. We report on three successful applications of the method for integrated vehicle and crew scheduling, railway track allocation, and railway vehicle rotation planning.
Today the railway timetabling process and the track allocation is one of the most challenging problems to solve by a railway infrastructure provider. Especially due to the deregulation of the transport market in the recent years several suppliers of railway traffic have entered the market. This leads to an increase of slot requests and then it is natural that conflicts occur among them. Furthermore, railway infrastructure networks consist of very expensive assets, even more they are rigid due to the long-term upgrade process. In order to make best use of these valuable infrastructure and to ensure economic operation, efficient planning of the railway operation is indispensable. Mathematical optimization models and algorithmic methodology can help to automatize and tackle these challenges. Our contribution in this paper is to present a renewed planning process due to the liberalization in Europe and a general framework to support the integration of simulation and optimization for railway capacity allocation.
Today the railway timetabling process and the track allocation is one of the most challenging problems to solve by a railway company. Especially due to the deregulation of the transport market in the recent years several suppliers of railway traffic have entered the market in Europe. This leads to more potential conflicts between trains caused by an increasing demand of train paths. Planning and operating railway transportation systems is extremely hard due to the combinatorial complexity of the underlying discrete optimization problems, the technical intricacies, and the immense size of the problem instances. In order to make best use of the infrastructure and to ensure economic operation, efficient planning of the railway operation is indispensable. Mathematical optimization models and algorithms can help to automatize and tackle these challenges. Our contribution in this paper is to present a renewed planning process due to the liberalization in Europe and an associated concept for track allocation, that consists of three important parts, simulation, aggregation, and optimization. Furthermore, we present results of our general framework for real world data.