62H30 Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis [See also 68T10]
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- ZIB-Report (20)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Habilitation (1)
Language
- English (22)
Has Fulltext
- yes (22)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (22) (remove)
Keywords
- cluster analysis (8)
- Perron cluster analysis (4)
- Self-Organizing Maps (4)
- metastability (3)
- Clustering (2)
- Model Selection, (2)
- Molecular Dynamics (2)
- Networks (2)
- Stochastic Block Model (2)
- Variational Bayes EM (2)
Institute
For using Data Mining, especially cluster analysis, one needs measures to determine the similarity or distance between data objects. In many application fields the data objects can have different information levels. In this case the widely used euclidean distance is an inappropriate measure. The present paper describes a concept how to use data of different information levels in cluster analysis and suggests an appropriate similarity measure. An example from practice is included, that shows the usefulness of the concept and the measure in combination with {\sc Kohonens} Self-Organizing Map algorithm, a well-known and powerful tool for cluster analysis.
One of the important tasks in Data Mining is automated cluster analysis. Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs) introduced by {\sc Kohonen} are, in principle, a powerful tool for this task. Up to now, however, its cluster identification part is still open to personal bias. The present paper suggests a new approach towards automated cluster identification based on a combination of SOMs with an eigenmode analysis that has recently been developed by {\sc Deuflhard et al.} in the context of molecular conformational dynamics. Details of the algorithm are worked out. Numerical examples from Data Mining and Molecular Dynamics are included.
Statistical methods for analyzing large data sets of molecular configurations within the chemical concept of molecular conformations are described. The strategies are based on dependencies between configurations of a molecular ensemble; the article concentrates on dependencies induces by a) correlations between the molecular degrees of freedom, b) geometrical similarities of configurations, and c) dynamical relations between subsets of configurations. The statistical technique realizing aspect a) is based on an approach suggested by {\sc Amadei et al.} (Proteins, 17 (1993)). It allows to identify essential degrees of freedom of a molecular system and is extended in order to determine single configurations as representatives for the crucial features related to these essential degrees of freedom. Aspects b) and c) are based on statistical cluster methods. They lead to a decomposition of the available simulation data into {\em conformational ensembles} or {\em subsets} with the property that all configurations in one of these subsets share a common chemical property. In contrast to the restriction to single representative conformations, conformational ensembles include information about, e.g., structural flexibility or dynamical connectivity. The conceptual similarities and differences of the three approaches are discussed in detail and are illustrated by application to simulation data originating from a hybrid Monte Carlo sampling of a triribonucleotide.