Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- In Proceedings (31)
- Article (12)
- ZIB-Report (5)
- Other (4)
- Book chapter (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Poster (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (58)
Keywords
- DHT (3)
- Paxos (2)
- Algorithms (1)
- Distributed System (1)
- P2P (1)
- Range Queries (1)
- Storage (1)
- Transaktionen (1)
- heuristic search (1)
- multidimensional data sets (1)
Achieving efficient many-to-many communication on a given network topology is a challenging task when many data streams from different sources have to be scattered concurrently to many destinations with low variance in arrival times. In such scenarios, it is critical to saturate but not to congest the bisectional bandwidth of the network topology in order to achieve a good aggregate throughput. When there are many concurrent point-to-point connections, the communication pattern needs to be dynamically scheduled in a fine-grained manner to avoid network congestion (links, switches), overload in the node’s incoming links, and receive buffer overflow. Motivated by the use case of the Compressed Baryonic Matter experiment (CBM), we study the performance and variance of such communication patterns on a Cray XC40 with different routing schemes and scheduling approaches. We present a distributed Data Flow Scheduler (DFS) that reduces the variance of arrival times from all sources at least 30 times and increases the achieved aggregate bandwidth by up to 50%.
User-defined and system-level checkpointing have contrary properties. While user-defined checkpoints are smaller and simpler to recover, system-level checkpointing better knows the global system's state and parameters like the expected mean time to failure (MTTF) per node. Both approaches lead to non-optimal checkpoint time, intervals, sizes, or I/O bandwidth when concurrent checkpoints conflict and compete for it.
We combine user-defined and system-level checkpointing to exploit the benefits and avoid the drawbacks of each other. Thus, applications frequently offer to create checkpoints. The system accepts such offers according to the current status and implied costs to recalculate from the last checkpoint or denies them, i.e., immediately lets continue the application without checkpoint creation. To support this approach, we develop economic models for multi-application checkpointing on shared I/O resources that are dedicated for checkpointing (e.g. burst-buffers) by defining an appropriate goal function and solving a global optimization problem.
Using our models, the checkpoints of applications on a supercomputer are scheduled to effectively use the available I/O bandwidth and minimize the failure overhead (checkpoint creations plus recalculations). Our simulations show an overall reduction in failure overhead of all nodes of up to 30% for a typical supercomputer workload (HLRN). We can also derive the most cost effective burst-buffer bandwidth for a given node's MTTF and application workload.