Refine
Document Type
- ZIB-Report (4)
Language
- English (4)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Keywords
- branch-and-bound (4) (remove)
Institute
Mixed integer programming (MIP) has become one of the most important techniques in Operations Research and Discrete Optimization. SCIP (Solving Constraint Integer Programs) is currently one of the fastest non-commercial MIP solvers. It is based on the branch-and-bound procedure in which the problem is recursively split into smaller subproblems, thereby creating a so-called branching tree. We present ParaSCIP, an extension of SCIP, which realizes a parallelization on a distributed memory computing environment. ParaSCIP uses SCIP solvers as independently running processes to solve subproblems (nodes of the branching tree) locally. This makes the parallelization development independent of the SCIP development. Thus, ParaSCIP directly profits from any algorithmic progress in future versions of SCIP. Using a first implementation of ParaSCIP, we were able to solve two previously unsolved instances from MIPLIB2003, a standard test set library for MIP solvers. For these computations, we used up to 2048 cores of the HLRN~II supercomputer.
In this article, we introduce parallel mixed integer linear programming (MILP) solvers. MILP solving algorithms have been improved tremendously in the last two decades. Currently, commercial MILP solvers are known as a strong optimization tool. Parallel MILP solver development has started in 1990s. However, since the improvements of solving algorithms have much impact to solve MILP problems than application of parallel computing, there were not many visible successes. With the spread of multi-core CPUs, current state-of-the-art MILP solvers have parallel implementations and researches to apply parallelism in the solving algorithm also getting popular. We summarize current existing parallel MILP solver architectures.
We present an exact rational solver for mixed-integer linear programming
that avoids the numerical inaccuracies inherent in the floating-point
computations used by existing software. This allows the solver to be used
for establishing theoretical results and in applications where correct
solutions are critical due to legal and financial consequences. Our solver
is a hybrid symbolic/numeric implementation of LP-based branch-and-bound,
using numerically-safe methods for all binding computations in the search
tree. Computing provably accurate solutions by dynamically choosing the
fastest of several safe dual bounding methods depending on the structure of
the instance, our exact solver is only moderately slower than an inexact
floating-point branch-and-bound solver. The software is incorporated into
the SCIP optimization framework, using the exact LP solver QSopt_ex and the
GMP arithmetic library. Computational results are presented for a suite of
test instances taken from the MIPLIB and Mittelmann collections.
Modern MIP solvers employ dozens of auxiliary algorithmic components to support the branch-and-bound search in finding and improving primal solutions and in strengthening the dual bound.
Typically, all components are tuned to minimize the average running time to prove optimality. In this article, we take a different look at the run of a MIP solver. We argue that the solution process consists of three different phases, namely achieving feasibility, improving the incumbent solution, and proving optimality. We first show that the entire solving process can be improved by adapting the search strategy with respect to the phase-specific aims using different control tunings. Afterwards, we provide criteria to predict the transition between the individual phases and evaluate the performance impact of altering the algorithmic behavior of the MIP solver SCIP at the predicted phase transition points.