Refine
Document Type
- Article (5) (remove)
Language
- English (5)
Has Fulltext
- no (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (5)
Institute
We consider the following freight train routing problem (FTRP).
Given is a transportation network with fixed routes for passenger
trains and a set of freight trains (requests), each defined by an
origin and destination station pair. The objective is to
calculate a feasible route for each freight train such that the
sum of all expected delays and all running times is minimal.
Previous research concentrated on microscopic train routings for
junctions or inside major stations. Only recently approaches were
developed to tackle larger corridors or even networks. We
investigate the routing problem from a strategic perspective,
calculating the routes in a macroscopic transportation network of
Deutsche Bahn AG. In this context, macroscopic refers to an
aggregation of complex and large real-world structures into fewer
network elements. Moreover, the departure and arrival times of
freight trains are approximated. The problem has a strategic
character since it asks only for a coarse routing through the
network without the precise timings. We provide a mixed-integer
nonlinear programming (MINLP) formulation for the FTRP, which is
a multicommodity flow model on a time-expanded graph with
additional routing constraints. The model’s nonlinearities
originate from an algebraic approximation of the delays of the
trains on the arcs of the network by capacity restraint
functions. The MINLP is reduced to a mixed-integer linear
model (MILP) by piecewise linear approximation. The latter is
solved by a state-of-the art MILP solver for various real-world
test instances.
Planning and operating railway transportation systems is an extremely hard task due to the combinatorial complexity of the underlying discrete optimization problems, the technical intricacies, and the immense size of the problem instances. Because of that, however, mathematical models and optimization techniques can result in large gains for both railway customers and operators, e.g., in terms of cost reductions or service quality improvements. In the last years a large and growing group of researchers in the OR community have devoted their attention to this domain developing mathematical models and optimization approaches to tackle many of the relevant problems in the railway planning process. However, there is still a gap to bridge between theory and practice (e.g. Cacchiani et al., 2014; Borndörfer et al., 2010), with a few notable exceptions. In this paper we address three individual success stories, namely, long-term freight train routing (part I), mid-term rolling stock rotation planning (part II), and real-time train dispatching (part III). In each case, we describe real-life, successful implementations. We will discuss the individual problem setting, survey the optimization literature, and focus on particular aspects addressed by the mathematical models. We demonstrate on concrete applications how mathematical optimization can support railway planning and operations. This gives proof that mathematical optimization can support the planning of railway resources. Thus, mathematical models and optimization can lead to a greater efficiency of railway operations and will serve as a powerful and innovative tool to meet recent challenges of the railway industry.
Managing rolling stock with no passengers aboard is a critical component of railway operations. One aspect of managing rolling stock is to park the rolling stock on a given set of tracks at the end of a day or service. Depending on the parking assignment, shunting may be required in order for a parked train to depart or for an incoming train to park. Given a collection of tracks M and a collection of trains T with a fixed arrival-departure timetable, the train assignment problem (TAP) is to determine the maximum number of trains from T that can be parked on M according to the timetable and without the use of shunting. Hence, efficiently solving the TAP allows to quickly compute feasible parking schedules that do not require further shunting adjustments. In this paper, we show that the TAP is NP-hard and present two integer programming models for solving the TAP. We compare both models on a theoretical level. Moreover, to our knowledge, we consider the first approach that integrates track lengths along with the three most common types of parking tracks FIFO, LIFO and FREE tracks in a common model. Furthermore, to optimize against uncertainty in the arrival times of the trains we extend our models by stochastic and robust modeling techniques. We conclude by giving computational results for both models, observing that they perform well on real timetables.
We present an optimization model which is capable of routing and ordering trains on a microscopic level under a moving block regime. Based on a general timetabling definition (GTTP) that allows the plug in of arbitrarily detailed methods to compute running and headway times, we describe a layered graph approach using velocity expansion, and develop a mixed integer linear programming formulation. Finally, we present promising results for a German corridor scenario with mixed traffic, indicating that applying branch-and-cut to our model is able to solve reasonably sized instances with up to hundred trains to optimality.