Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- ZIB-Report (26)
- Article (13)
- In Proceedings (13)
- Other (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (53)
Keywords
- Optimal Experimental Design (3)
- SDP (3)
- Flows in graphs (2)
- Game Theory (2)
- Hilbert's projective metric (2)
- Integer Programming (2)
- Mixed Integer Programming (2)
- SOCP (2)
- Semidefinite Programming (2)
- Stackelberg Equilibrium (2)
Institute
- Mathematical Optimization (52)
- Mathematics of Transportation and Logistics (28)
- Mathematics of Health Care (16)
- Network Optimization (2)
- Visual Data Analysis (2)
- Visual and Data-centric Computing (2)
- Computational Medicine (1)
- Numerical Mathematics (1)
- Visual Data Analysis in Science and Engineering (1)
We present a game-theoretic approach to optimize the strategies of toll enforcement on a motorway network. In contrast to previous approaches, we consider a network with an arbitrary topology, and we handle the fact that users may choose their Origin-Destination path; in particular they may take a detour to avoid sections with a high control rate. We show that a Nash equilibrium can be computed with an LP (although the game is not zero-sum), and we give a MIP for the computation of a Stackelberg equilibrium. Experimental results based on an application to the enforcement of a truck toll on German motorways are presented.
We propose a game theoretic model for the spatial distribution of inspectors on a transportation network. The problem is to spread out the controls so as to enforce the payment of a transit toll. We formulate a linear program to find the control distribution which maximizes the expected toll revenue, and a mixed integer program for the problem of minimizing the number of evaders. Furthermore, we show that the problem of finding an optimal mixed strategy for a coalition of $N$ inspectors can be solved efficiently by a column generation procedure. Finally, we give experimental results from an application to the truck toll on German motorways.
We present the problem of planning mobile tours of inspectors on German motorways to enforce the payment of the toll for heavy good trucks. This is a special type of vehicle routing problem with the objective to conduct as good inspections as possible on the complete network. In addition, we developed a personalized crew rostering model, to schedule the crews of the tours. The planning of daily tours and the rostering are combined in a novel integrated approach and formulated as a complex and large scale Integer Program. The main focus of this paper extends our previous publications on how different requirements for the rostering can be modeled in detail. The second focus is on a bi-criteria analysis of the planning problem to find the balance between the control quality and the roster acceptance. Finally, computational results on real-world instances show the practicability of our method and how different input parameters influence the problem complexity.
This paper proposes the first model for toll enforcement optimization on German motorways. The enforcement is done by mobile control teams and our goal is to produce a schedule achieving network-wide control, proportional to spatial and time-dependent traffic distributions. Our model consists of two parts. The first plans control tours using a vehicle routing approach with profits and some side constraints. The second plans feasible rosters for the control teams. Both problems can be modeled as Multi-Commodity Flow Problems. Adding additional coupling constraints produces a large-scale integrated integer programming formulation. We show that this model can be solved to optimality for real world instances associated with a control area in East Germany.
In this paper we present the problem of computing optimal tours of toll inspectors on German motorways. This problem is a special type of vehicle routing problem and builds up an integrated model, consisting of a tour planning and a duty rostering part. The tours should guarantee a network-wide control whose intensity is proportional to given spatial and time dependent traffic distributions. We model this using a space-time network and formulate the associated optimization problem by an integer program (IP). Since sequential approaches fail, we integrated the assignment of crews to the tours in our model. In this process all duties of a crew member must fit in a feasible roster. It is modeled as a Multi-Commodity Flow Problem in a directed acyclic graph, where specific paths correspond to feasible rosters for one month. We present computational results in a case-study on a German subnetwork which documents the practicability of our approach.
An algorithm based on a delayed constraint generation method for solving semi-infinite programs
for constructing minimax optimal designs for nonlinear models is proposed. The outer optimization level of the minimax
optimization problem is solved using a semidefinite programming based approach that requires
the design space be discretized. A nonlinear programming solver is then used to solve the inner program
to determine the combination of the parameters that yields the worst-case value of the design criterion.
The proposed algorithm is applied to find minimax optimal designs for the logistic model, the flexible 4-parameter
Hill homoscedastic model and the general nth order consecutive reaction model, and shows that it
(i) produces designs that compare well with minimax $D-$optimal designs obtained from semi-infinite programming method in the literature;
(ii) can be applied to semidefinite representable optimality criteria, that include the common A-, E-,G-, I- and D-optimality criteria;
(iii) can tackle design problems with arbitrary linear constraints on the weights; and
(iv) is fast and relatively easy to use.
We propose (Mixed Integer) Second Order Cone Programming formulations to find approximate and exact $D-$optimal designs for $2^k$
factorial experiments for Generalized Linear Models (GLMs). Locally optimal designs are addressed with Second Order Cone Programming
(SOCP) and Mixed Integer Second Order Cone Programming (MISOCP) formulations.
The formulations are extended for scenarios of parametric uncertainty employing the Bayesian framework for
\emph{log det} $D-$optimality criterion. A quasi Monte-Carlo sampling procedure based
on the Hammersley sequence is used for integrating the optimality criterion in the parametric region. The problems are solved in \texttt{GAMS}
environment using \texttt{CPLEX} solver. We demonstrate the application of the algorithm with the logistic, probit and complementary log-log models
and consider full and fractional factorial designs.
Let the design of an
experiment be represented by an $s$-dimensional vector
$\vec{w}$ of weights with non-negative components. Let the quality of
$\vec{w}$ for the estimation of the parameters of the statistical model
be measured by the criterion of $D$-optimality defined as the $m$-th root
of the determinant of the information matrix $M(\vec{w})=\sum_{i=1}^s
w_iA_iA_i^T$, where $A_i$, $i=1,...,s$, are known matrices with $m$ rows.
In the paper, we show that the criterion of $D$-optimality is second-order
cone representable. As a result, the method of second order cone
programming can be used to compute an approximate $D$-optimal design with
any system of linear constraints on the vector of weights. More
importantly, the proposed characterization allows us to compute an
\emph{exact} $D$-optimal design, which is possible thanks to high-quality
branch-and-cut solvers specialized to solve mixed integer second order cone
problems.
We prove that some other widely used criteria are also second order cone
representable, for instance the criteria of $A$-, and $G$-optimality, as
well as the criteria of $D_K$- and $A_K$-optimality, which are extensions
of $D$-, and $A$-optimality used in the case when only a specific system of
linear combinations of parameters is of interest.
We present several numerical examples demonstrating the efficiency and
universality of the proposed method. We show that in many cases the mixed
integer second order cone programming approach allows us to find a provably
optimal exact design, while the standard heuristics systematically miss the
optimum.