Refine
Document Type
- Article (9)
- In Proceedings (2)
- Poster (2)
Has Fulltext
- no (13) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (13)
Vertebral labelling and segmentation are two fundamental tasks in an automated spine processing pipeline. Reliable and accurate processing of spine images is expected to benefit clinical decision support systems for diagnosis, surgery planning, and population-based analysis of spine and bone health. However, designing automated algorithms for spine processing is challenging predominantly due to considerable variations in anatomy and acquisition protocols and due to a severe shortage of publicly available data. Addressing these limitations, the Large Scale Vertebrae Segmentation Challenge (VerSe) was organised in conjunction with the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) in 2019 and 2020, with a call for algorithms tackling the labelling and segmentation of vertebrae. Two datasets containing a total of 374 multi-detector CT scans from 355 patients were prepared and 4505 vertebrae have individually been annotated at voxel level by a human-machine hybrid algorithm (https://osf.io/nqjyw/, https://osf.io/t98fz/). A total of 25 algorithms were benchmarked on these datasets. In this work, we present the results of this evaluation and further investigate the performance variation at the vertebra level, scan level, and different fields of view. We also evaluate the generalisability of the approaches to an implicit domain shift in data by evaluating the top-performing algorithms of one challenge iteration on data from the other iteration. The principal takeaway from VerSe: the performance of an algorithm in labelling and segmenting a spine scan hinges on its ability to correctly identify vertebrae in cases of rare anatomical variations. The VerSe content and code can be accessed at: https://github.com/anjany/verse.
Acetabular bone defects are still challenging to quantify. Numerous classification schemes have been proposed to categorize the diverse kinds of defects. However, these classification schemes are mainly descriptive and hence it remains difficult to apply them in pre-clinical testing, implant development and pre-operative planning. By reconstructing the native situation of a defect pelvis using a Statistical Shape Model (SSM), a more quantitative analysis of the bone defects could be performed. The aim of this study is to develop such a SSM and to validate its accuracy using relevant clinical scenarios and parameters.
Die Positionierung des B-FMT der Vibrant Bonebridge kann aufgrund der anatomischen Verhältnisse des Mastoids und der Größe des Aktuators ohne eine vorherige Beurteilung der individuellen Computertomographie (CT) des Felsenbeins problematisch sein. Die Entwicklung eines einfach zu bedienenden Viewers, welcher eine Positionierung des B-FMT im Felsenbeinmodell ermöglicht und hier auf individuelle potenzielle anatomische Konflikte hinweist sowie Lösungsmöglichkeiten anbietet, kann ein hilfreiches Werkzeug zur präoperativen Positionierung sein.
Ziel der Arbeit war die Definition von Anforderungen und die Anfertigung eines Prototyps eines Vibrant-Bonebridge-Viewers.
Auf der Basis einer ZIBAmira-Software-Version und der Inklusion eines B-FMT-Modells unter Erstellung eines Felsenbeinmodells, welches die intuitive Beurteilung von Konflikten ermöglicht, erfolgte die Erstellung des Prototyps eines Vibrant-Bonebridge-Viewers.Ergebnisse. Die Segmentierungszeit der individuellen DICOM-Daten („digital imaging and communications in medicine“) beträgt etwa 5 min. Eine Positionierung im individuellen 3-D-Felsenbeinmodell ermöglicht die quantitative und qualitative Beurteilung von Konflikten (Sinus sigmoideus, mittlere Schädelgrube) und das Aufsuchen einer bevorzugten Position. Das Anheben des B-FMT mittels virtueller Unterlegscheiben kann simuliert werden.
Der erstellte Vibrant-Bonebridge-Viewer ermöglicht verlässlich eine Simulation der B-FMT-Positionierung. Die klinische Anwendbarkeit muss evaluiert werden.
This study’s objective was the generation of a standardized geometry of the healthy nasal cavity.
An average geometry of the healthy nasal cavity was generated using a statistical shape model based on 25 symptom-free subjects. Airflow within the average geometry and these geometries was calculated using fluid simulations. Integral measures of the nasal resistance, wall shear stresses (WSS) and velocities were calculated as well as cross-sectional areas (CSA). Furthermore, individual WSS and static pressure distributions were mapped onto the average geometry.
The average geometry featured an overall more regular shape that resulted in less resistance, reduced wall shear stresses and velocities compared to the median of the 25 geometries. Spatial distributions of WSS and pressure of average geometry agreed well compared to the average distributions of all individual geometries. The minimal CSA of the average geometry was larger than the median of all individual geometries (83.4 vs. 74.7 mm²).
The airflow observed within the average geometry of the healthy nasal cavity did not equal the average airflow of the individual geometries. While differences observed for integral measures were notable, the calculated values for the average geometry lay within the distributions of the individual parameters. Spatially resolved parameters differed less prominently.
We present an automated method for extrapolating missing
regions in label data of the skull in an anatomically plausible manner. The ultimate goal is to design patient-specic cranial implants for correcting large, arbitrarily shaped defects of the skull that can, for example, result from trauma of the head. Our approach utilizes a 3D statistical shape model (SSM) of the skull and a 2D generative adversarial network (GAN) that is trained in an unsupervised fashion from samples of healthy patients alone. By tting the SSM to given input labels containing the skull defect, a First approximation of the healthy state of the patient is obtained. The GAN is then applied to further correct and smooth the output of the SSM in an anatomically plausible manner. Finally, the defect region is extracted using morphological operations and subtraction between the extrapolated healthy state of the patient and the defective input labels. The method is trained and evaluated based on data from the MICCAI 2020 AutoImplant challenge. It produces state-of-the art results on regularly
shaped cut-outs that were present in the training and testing data of the challenge. Furthermore, due to unsupervised nature of the approach, the method generalizes well to previously unseen defects of varying shapes that were only present in the hidden test dataset.