Refine
Year of publication
- 2020 (6) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (6) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (6)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (6) (remove)
混合整数計画法 (Mixed Integer Programming: MIP) は,MIP を解くソフトウェアである MIP ソルバが大規模な現実問題を解けるようになったこともあり,現実問題を解く有用な OR の手法として広く知られるようになった.しかしながら,MIP ソルバの開発に欠かせないベンチマーク・データセットおよび性能測定方法についてはそれほど広く知られているとは言い難い.ベンチマーク・データセットは注意を払って作成しないと,多くのバイアスがかかってしまう.それらのバイアスを可能な限りのぞき,真に有用なベンチマーク・テストの結果を得るためには複数の人数で多大な労力を割く必要がある.本稿では,そのような MIP ソルバ開発の背景として重要な役割を果たしてきた MIPLIB と Hans Mittelmann’s benchmarks について解説する.また,本稿において Hans Mittelmann’s benchmarks は,BENCHMARKS FOR OPTIMIZATION SOFTWAREのページ (http://plato.asu.edu/bench.html) に示されているベンチマークである.
A robust optimal design method of energy supply systems under uncertain energy demands has been proposed using a mixed- integer linear model for constituent equipment. A robust optimal design problem has been formulated as a three-level min-max- min optimization one by expressing uncertain energy demands by intervals, evaluating the robustness in a performance criterion based on the minimax regret criterion, and considering hierarchical relationships among design variables, uncertain energy demands, and operation variables. Since this problem must be solved by a special algorithm and is too difficult to solve even using a commercial solver, a hierarchical optimization approach has been applied to solve the problem but its application is limited only to small scale toy problems. In this paper, some strategies are introduced into the hierarchical optimization approach to enhance the computation efficiency for the purpose of applying the approach to large scale practical problems. In a case study, the proposed approach is applied to the robust optimal design of a cogeneration system with a complex configuration, and the validity and effectiveness of the method are ascertained.
A robust optimal design method of energy supply systems under uncertain energy demands has been proposed using a mixed-integer linear model for constituent equipment. However, this method takes a long computation time, and thus it can be applied only to small-scale problems. In this paper, a hierarchical optimization method is applied to two types of optimization problems for evaluating robustness to solve them efficiently. In a case study, the proposed method is applied to a cogeneration system with a complex configuration, and the validity and effectiveness of the method are ascertained.
To attain the highest performance of energy supply systems, it is necessary to determine design specifications optimally in consideration of operational strategies corresponding to seasonal and hourly variations in energy demands. Mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) methods have been applied widely to such optimal design problems. A hierarchical MILP method has been proposed to solve the problems very efficiently. In addition, by utilizing features of the hierarchical MILP method, a method of reducing model by clustering periods based on the optimal operational strategies of equipment has been proposed to search design solution candidates efficiently in the relaxed optimal design problem at the upper level. In this paper, these methods are applied to the multiobjective optimal design of a cogeneration system by considering the annual total cost and primary energy consumption as the objective functions to be minimized. Through a case study, it turns out that the model reduction by the operation-based time-period clustering is effective in terms of the computation efficiency when importance is given to the first objective function, while it is not when importance is given to the second objective function.
To attain the highest performance of energy supply systems, it is necessary to determine design specifications optimally in consideration of operational strategies corresponding to seasonal and hourly variations in energy demands. A hierarchical mixed-integer linear programming method has been proposed to solve such an optimal design problem efficiently. In this paper, a method of reducing model by clustering periods with the k-medoids method is applied to the relaxed optimal design problem at the upper level. Through a case study, it is clarified how the proposed method is effective to enhance the computation efficiency in a large scale optimal design problem.
On average, an approved drug today costs $2-3 billion and takes over ten years to develop1. In part, this is due to expensive and time-consuming wet-lab experiments, poor initial hit compounds, and the high attrition rates in the (pre-)clinical phases. Structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) has the potential to mitigate these problems. With SBVS, the quality of the hits improves with the number of compounds screened2. However, despite the fact that large compound databases exist, the ability to carry out large-scale SBVSs on computer clusters in an accessible, efficient, and flexible manner has remained elusive. Here we designed VirtualFlow, a highly automated and versatile open-source platform with perfect scaling behaviour that is able to prepare and efficiently screen ultra-large ligand libraries of compounds. VirtualFlow is able to use a variety of the most powerful docking programs. Using VirtualFlow, we have prepared the largest and freely available ready-to-dock ligand library available, with over 1.4 billion commercially available molecules. To demonstrate the power of VirtualFlow, we screened over 1 billion compounds and discovered a small molecule inhibitor (iKeap1) that engages KEAP1 with nanomolar affinity (Kd = 114 nM) and disrupts the interaction between KEAP1 and the transcription factor NRF2. We also identified a set of structurally diverse molecules that bind to KEAP1 with submicromolar affinity. This illustrates the potential of VirtualFlow to access vast regions of the chemical space and identify binders with high affinity for target proteins.