Overview Statistic: PDF-Downloads (blue) and Frontdoor-Views (gray)

Article’s scientific prestige: Measuring the impact of individual articles in the web of science

  • We performed a citation analysis on the Web of Science publications consisting of more than 63 million articles and 1.45 billion citations on 254 subjects from 1981 to 2020. We proposed the Article’s Scientific Prestige (ASP) metric and compared this metric to number of citations (#Cit) and journal grade in measuring the scientific impact of individual articles in the large-scale hierarchical and multi-disciplined citation network. In contrast to #Cit, ASP, that is computed based on the eigenvector centrality, considers both direct and indirect citations, and provides steady-state evaluation cross different disciplines. We found that ASP and #Cit are not aligned for most articles, with a growing mismatch amongst the less cited articles. While both metrics are reliable for evaluating the prestige of articles such as Nobel Prize winning articles, ASP tends to provide more persuasive rankings than #Cit when the articles are not highly cited. The journal grade, that is eventually determined by a few highly cited articles, is unable to properly reflect the scientific impact of individual articles. The number of references and coauthors are less relevant to scientific impact, but subjects do make a difference.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics - number of accesses to the document
Author:Ying ChenORCiD, Thorsten Koch, Nazgul Zakiyeva, Kailiang Liu, Zhitong Xu, Chun-houh ChenORCiD, Junji Nakano, Keisuke Honda
Document Type:Article
Parent Title (English):Journal of Informetrics
First Page:101379
Year of first publication:2023
Accept ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.