TY - GEN A1 - Becker, Pascal-Nicolas A1 - Bertelmann, Roland A1 - Ceynowa, Klaus A1 - Christof, Jürgen A1 - Dierkes, Thomas A1 - Goltz-Fellgiebel, Julia Alexandra A1 - Groß, Matthias A1 - Heidrich, Regina A1 - Höhnow, Tobias A1 - Kassube, Michael A1 - Koch, Thorsten A1 - Kuberek, Monika A1 - Landes, Lilian A1 - Pampel, Heinz A1 - Putnings, Markus A1 - Rusch, Beate A1 - Schäffler, Hildegard A1 - Schobert, Dagmar A1 - Schwab, Oliver A1 - Schwidder, Jens A1 - Söllner, Konstanze A1 - Stoyanova, Tonka A1 - Vierkant, Paul T1 - Questionnaire for effective exchange of bibliographic metadata – current status of publishing houses N2 - The project DeepGreen aims to realise better usage of green open access publication rights with regard to Alliance Licenses in Germany (https://www.nationallizenzen.de/open-access). Together with publishers who offer Alliance Licenses and authorized libraries, the project group intends to develop a prototype of a nearly fully automated workflow that covers the delivery of data from the publishers, including the article full texts, as well as the process of loading data into the institutional repositories of licensees. Further information about the project can be found within ZIB-Report 15-58, urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-56799. In order to become acquainted with publishers’ processes for exchanging documents and metadata, the project group developed a questionnaire for an online survey. The publishing of this questionnaire is intended to demonstrate relevant aspects of the issue (e. g. methods of data exchange, protocols and interfaces) and to foster reuse of valuable questionnaire elements. The XML-file can be reused as a template, the PDF-file reproduces the original survey layout. KW - Open Access KW - Open Access KW - Questionnaire Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-60419 N1 - This work is in the public domain: CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ER - TY - GEN A1 - Becker, Pascal-Nicolas A1 - Bertelmann, Roland A1 - Ceynowa, Klaus A1 - Christof, Jürgen A1 - Dierkes, Thomas A1 - Goltz-Fellgiebel, Julia Alexandra A1 - Groß, Matthias A1 - Heidrich, Regina A1 - Höhnow, Tobias A1 - Kassube, Michael A1 - Koch, Thorsten A1 - Kuberek, Monika A1 - Landes, Lilian A1 - Pampel, Heinz A1 - Putnings, Markus A1 - Rusch, Beate A1 - Schäffler, Hildegard A1 - Schobert, Dagmar A1 - Schwab, Oliver A1 - Schwidder, Jens A1 - Söllner, Konstanze A1 - Stoyanova, Tonka A1 - Vierkant, Paul T1 - DeepGreen – Metadata Schema for the exchange of publications between publishers and open access repositories. Version 1.1. June 2016 N2 - In 2011, important priorities were set to realize green publications in the open access movement in Germany. With financial support from the German Research Foundation (DFG), libraries negotiated Alliance licenses with publishers that guarantee extensive open access rights. Authors of institutions, that have therewith access to licensed journals, can freely publish their articles immediately or after a short embargo period in a repository of their choice. However, authors hesitantly use these open access rights. Also libraries – as managers of institutional and subject based repositories and thus legitimated representatives for the authors – only rarely make use of these rights. The aim of DeepGreen is to make the majority of those publications available online. Together with publishers of the Alliance licenses, the project consortium wants to develop a nearly fully automated workflow that covers both the delivery of data, including the full texts, of the publishers, as well as the data transformation to the necessary import formats and the loading process into the repositories. An intermediate “publication router” will serve as a distribution platform. The DeepGreen metadata schema contains metadata properties describing a wide range of deliverable bibliographic metadata from the Alliance license publishers (most common standards are JATS and CrossRef XML) as well as its compliance with technical, quality and metadata standards of the repositories. The schema includes required metadata elements and optional properties providing additional information.The metadata schema is aligned to the OCLC repository best practices (“Best Practices for CONTENTdm and other OAI-PMH compliant repositories: creating sharable metadata”, URL: http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/support/wcdigitalcollectiongateway/MetadataBestPractices.pdf). The current version of the schema is subject to changes as the functional requirements and workflow practices are evolving during the project experiences and prototype production. T3 - ZIB-Report - 16-32 Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-59580 SN - 1438-0064 N1 - This work is in the public domain: CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Oltmanns, Elias A1 - Hasler, Tim A1 - Peters-Kottig, Wolfgang A1 - Kuper, Heinz-Günter T1 - Different Preservation Levels: The Case of Scholarly Digital Editions JF - Data Science Journal N2 - Ensuring the long-term availability of research data forms an integral part of data management services. Where OAIS compliant digital preservation has been established in recent years, in almost all cases the services aim at the preservation of file-based objects. In the Digital Humanities, research data is often represented in highly structured aggregations, such as Scholarly Digital Editions. Naturally, scholars would like their editions to remain functionally complete as long as possible. Besides standard components like webservers, the presentation typically relies on project specific code interacting with client software like webbrowsers. Especially the latter being subject to rapid change over time invariably makes such environments awkward to maintain once funding has ended. Pragmatic approaches have to be found in order to balance the curation effort and the maintainability of access to research data over time. A sketch of four potential service levels aiming at the long-term availability of research data in the humanities is outlined: (1) Continuous Maintenance, (2) Application Conservation, (3) Application Data Preservation, and (4) Bitstream Preservation. The first being too costly and the last hardly satisfactory in general, we suggest that the implementation of services by an infrastructure provider should concentrate on service levels 2 and 3. We explain their strengths and limitations considering the example of two Scholarly Digital Editions. KW - Digital Preservation Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-051 VL - 18 IS - 1(51) ER -