TY - GEN A1 - Witzig, Jakob A1 - Gleixner, Ambros T1 - Conflict-Driven Heuristics for Mixed Integer Programming N2 - Two essential ingredients of modern mixed-integer programming (MIP) solvers are diving heuristics that simulate a partial depth-first search in a branch-and-bound search tree and conflict analysis of infeasible subproblems to learn valid constraints. So far, these techniques have mostly been studied independently: primal heuristics under the aspect of finding high-quality feasible solutions early during the solving process and conflict analysis for fathoming nodes of the search tree and improving the dual bound. Here, we combine both concepts in two different ways. First, we develop a diving heuristic that targets the generation of valid conflict constraints from the Farkas dual. We show that in the primal this is equivalent to the optimistic strategy of diving towards the best bound with respect to the objective function. Secondly, we use information derived from conflict analysis to enhance the search of a diving heuristic akin to classical coefficient diving. The computational performance of both methods is evaluated using an implementation in the source-open MIP solver SCIP. Experiments are carried out on publicly available test sets including Miplib 2010 and Cor@l. T3 - ZIB-Report - 19-08 KW - mixed integer programming; primal heuristics; conflict analysis; branch-and-bound Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-72204 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Witzig, Jakob A1 - Berthold, Timo A1 - Heinz, Stefan T1 - Experiments with Conflict Analysis in Mixed Integer Programming N2 - The analysis of infeasible subproblems plays an import role in solving mixed integer programs (MIPs) and is implemented in most major MIP solvers. There are two fundamentally different concepts to generate valid global constraints from infeasible subproblems. The first is to analyze the sequence of implications obtained by domain propagation that led to infeasibility. The result of the analysis is one or more sets of contradicting variable bounds from which so-called conflict constraints can be generated. This concept has its origin in solving satisfiability problems and is similarly used in constraint programming. The second concept is to analyze infeasible linear programming (LP) relaxations. The dual LP solution provides a set of multipliers that can be used to generate a single new globally valid linear constraint. The main contribution of this short paper is an empirical evaluation of two ways to combine both approaches. Experiments are carried out on general MIP instances from standard public test sets such as Miplib2010; the presented algorithms have been implemented within the non-commercial MIP solver SCIP. Moreover, we present a pool-based approach to manage conflicts which addresses the way a MIP solver traverses the search tree better than aging strategies known from SAT solving. T3 - ZIB-Report - 16-63 Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-61087 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - Conflict Driven Diving for Mixed Integer Programming N2 - The analysis of infeasibility plays an important role in solving satisfiability problems (SAT) and mixed integer programs (MIPs). In mixed integer programming, this procedure is called conflict analysis. So far, modern MIP solvers use conflict analysis only for propagation and improving the dual bound, i.e., fathoming nodes that cannot contain feasible solutions. In this short paper, we present a new approach which uses conflict information to improve the primal bound during a MIP solve. To derive new improving primal solutions we use a conflict driven diving heuristic called conflict diving that uses the information obtained by conflict analysis. Conflict diving pursues a twofold strategy. By using conflict information the new diving approach is guided into parts of the search space that are usually not explored by other diving heuristics. At the same time, conflict diving has a fail-fast-strategy to reduce the time spent if it cannot find a new primal solution. As a byproduct, additional valid conflict constraints can be derived, from which a MIP solver can gain benefit to improve the dual bound as well. To show the added-value of conflict diving within a MIP solver, conflict diving has been implemented within the non-commercial MIP solver SCIP. Experiments are carried out on general MIP instances from standard public test sets, like MIPLIB2010 or Cor@l. T3 - ZIB-Report - 17-69 Y1 - 2017 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-66116 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Schade, Stanley A1 - Schlechte, Thomas A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - Structure-based Decomposition for Pattern-Detection for Railway Timetables N2 - We consider the problem of pattern detection in large scale railway timetables. This problem arises in rolling stock optimization planning in order to identify invariant sections of the timetable for which a cyclic rotation plan is adequate. We propose a dual reduction technique which leads to an decomposition and enumeration method. Computational results for real world instances demonstrate that the method is able to produce optimal solutions as fast as standard MIP solvers. T3 - ZIB-Report - 17-40 Y1 - 2017 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-64525 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Witzig, Jakob A1 - Berthold, Timo A1 - Heinz, Stefan T1 - Experiments with Conflict Analysis in Mixed Integer Programming T2 - Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming. CPAIOR 2017 N2 - The analysis of infeasible subproblems plays an import role in solving mixed integer programs (MIPs) and is implemented in most major MIP solvers. There are two fundamentally different concepts to generate valid global constraints from infeasible subproblems. The first is to analyze the sequence of implications obtained by domain propagation that led to infeasibility. The result of the analysis is one or more sets of contradicting variable bounds from which so-called conflict constraints can be generated. This concept has its origin in solving satisfiability problems and is similarly used in constraint programming. The second concept is to analyze infeasible linear programming (LP) relaxations. The dual LP solution provides a set of multipliers that can be used to generate a single new globally valid linear constraint. The main contribution of this short paper is an empirical evaluation of two ways to combine both approaches. Experiments are carried out on general MIP instances from standard public test sets such as Miplib2010; the presented algorithms have been implemented within the non-commercial MIP solver SCIP. Moreover, we present a pool-based approach to manage conflicts which addresses the way a MIP solver traverses the search tree better than aging strategies known from SAT solving. Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59776-8_17 VL - 10335 SP - 211 EP - 222 PB - Springer ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Schade, Stanley A1 - Schlechte, Thomas A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - Structure-based Decomposition for Pattern-Detection for Railway Timetables T2 - Operations Research Proceedings 2017 N2 - We consider the problem of pattern detection in large scale railway timetables. This problem arises in rolling stock optimization planning in order to identify invariant sections of the timetable for which a cyclic rotation plan is adequate. We propose a dual reduction technique which leads to an decomposition and enumeration method. Computational results for real world instances demonstrate that the method is able to produce optimal solutions as fast as standard MIP solvers. Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89920-6_95 SP - 715 EP - 721 PB - Springer International Publishing ER - TY - GEN A1 - Witzig, Jakob A1 - Beckenbach, Isabel A1 - Eifler, Leon A1 - Fackeldey, Konstantin A1 - Gleixner, Ambros A1 - Grever, Andreas A1 - Weber, Marcus T1 - Mixed-Integer Programming for Cycle Detection in Non-reversible Markov Processes N2 - In this paper, we present a new, optimization-based method to exhibit cyclic behavior in non-reversible stochastic processes. While our method is general, it is strongly motivated by discrete simulations of ordinary differential equations representing non-reversible biological processes, in particular molecular simulations. Here, the discrete time steps of the simulation are often very small compared to the time scale of interest, i.e., of the whole process. In this setting, the detection of a global cyclic behavior of the process becomes difficult because transitions between individual states may appear almost reversible on the small time scale of the simulation. We address this difficulty using a mixed-integer programming model that allows us to compute a cycle of clusters with maximum net flow, i.e., large forward and small backward probability. For a synthetic genetic regulatory network consisting of a ring-oscillator with three genes, we show that this approach can detect the most productive overall cycle, outperforming classical spectral analysis methods. Our method applies to general non-equilibrium steady state systems such as catalytic reactions, for which the objective value computes the effectiveness of the catalyst. T3 - ZIB-Report - 16-39 KW - Non-reversible Markov Processes KW - NESS KW - Mixed-Integer Programming KW - Markov State Models Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-60353 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Witzig, Jakob A1 - Gamrath, Gerald A1 - Hiller, Benjamin T1 - Reoptimization Techniques in MIP Solvers N2 - Recently, there have been many successful applications of optimization algorithms that solve a sequence of quite similar mixed-integer programs (MIPs) as subproblems. Traditionally, each problem in the sequence is solved from scratch. In this paper we consider reoptimization techniques that try to benefit from information obtained by solving previous problems of the sequence. We focus on the case that subsequent MIPs differ only in the objective function or that the feasible region is reduced. We propose extensions of the very complex branch-and-bound algorithms employed by general MIP solvers based on the idea to ``warmstart'' using the final search frontier of the preceding solver run. We extend the academic MIP solver SCIP by these techniques to obtain a reoptimizing branch-and-bound solver and report computational results which show the effectiveness of the approach. T3 - ZIB-Report - 15-24 Y1 - 2015 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-54375 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Witzig, Jakob A1 - Beckenbach, Isabel A1 - Eifler, Leon A1 - Fackeldey, Konstantin A1 - Gleixner, Ambros A1 - Grever, Andreas A1 - Weber, Marcus T1 - Mixed-Integer Programming for Cycle Detection in Non-reversible Markov Processes JF - Multiscale Modeling and Simulation N2 - In this paper, we present a new, optimization-based method to exhibit cyclic behavior in non-reversible stochastic processes. While our method is general, it is strongly motivated by discrete simulations of ordinary differential equations representing non-reversible biological processes, in particular molecular simulations. Here, the discrete time steps of the simulation are often very small compared to the time scale of interest, i.e., of the whole process. In this setting, the detection of a global cyclic behavior of the process becomes difficult because transitions between individual states may appear almost reversible on the small time scale of the simulation. We address this difficulty using a mixed-integer programming model that allows us to compute a cycle of clusters with maximum net flow, i.e., large forward and small backward probability. For a synthetic genetic regulatory network consisting of a ring-oscillator with three genes, we show that this approach can detect the most productive overall cycle, outperforming classical spectral analysis methods. Our method applies to general non-equilibrium steady state systems such as catalytic reactions, for which the objective value computes the effectiveness of the catalyst. KW - Markov State Models KW - NESS KW - Non-reversible Markov Processes KW - Mixed-Integer Programming Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1091162 SN - 1438-0064 VL - 16 IS - 1 SP - 248 EP - 265 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Gamrath, Gerald A1 - Hiller, Benjamin A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - Reoptimization Techniques in MIP Solvers N2 - Recently, there have been many successful applications of optimization algorithms that solve a sequence of quite similar mixed-integer programs (MIPs) as subproblems. Traditionally, each problem in the sequence is solved from scratch. In this paper we consider reoptimization techniques that try to benefit from information obtained by solving previous problems of the sequence. We focus on the case that subsequent MIPs differ only in the objective function or that the feasible region is reduced. We propose extensions of the very complex branch-and-bound algorithms employed by general MIP solvers based on the idea to ``warmstart'' using the final search frontier of the preceding solver run. We extend the academic MIP solver SCIP by these techniques to obtain a reoptimizing branch-and-bound solver and report computational results which show the effectiveness of the approach. Y1 - 2015 SN - 978-3-319-20086-6 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20086-6_14 VL - 9125 SP - 181 EP - 192 PB - Springer ET - Experimental Algorithms, Lecture Notes in Computer Science ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hiller, Benjamin A1 - Klug, Torsten A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - Reoptimization in branch-and-bound algorithms with an application to elevator control T2 - Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38527-8_33 VL - 7933 SP - 378 EP - 389 ER - TY - THES A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - Reoptimization Techniques in MIP Solvers N2 - Many optimization problems can be modeled as Mixed Integer Programs (MIPs). In general, MIPs cannot be solved efficiently, since solving MIPs is NP-hard, see, e.g., Schrijver, 2003. Common methods for solving NP-hard problems are branch-and-bound and column generation. In the case of column generation, the original problem becomes decomposed or re-formulated into one ore more smaller subproblems, which are easier to solve. Each of these subproblems is solved separately and recurrently, which can be interpreted as solving a sequence of optimization problems. In this thesis, we consider a sequence of MIPs which only differ in the respective objective functions. Furthermore, we assume each of these MIPs get solved with a branch-and-bound algorithm. This thesis aims to figure out whether the solving process of a given sequence of MIPs can be accelerated by reoptimization. As reoptimization we understand starting the solving process of a MIP of this sequence at a given frontier of a search tree corresponding to another MIP of this sequence. At the beginning we introduce an LP-based branch-and-bound algorithm. This algorithm is inspired by the reoptimizing algorithm of Hiller, Klug, and the author of this thesis, 2013. Since most of the state-of-the-art MIP solvers come to decisions based on dual information, which leads to the loss of feasible solutions after changing the objective function, we present a technique to guarantee optimality despite using these information. A decision is based on a dual information if this decision is valid for at least one feasible solution, whereas a decision is based on a primal information if this decision is valid for all feasible solutions. Afterwards, we consider representing the search frontier of the tree by a set of nodes of a given size. We call this the Tree Compression Problem. Moreover, we present a criterion characterizing the similarity of two objective functions. To evaluate our approach of reoptimization we extend the well-known and well-maintained MIP solver SCIP to an LP-based branch-and-bound framework, introduce two heuristics for solving the Tree Compression Problem, and a primal heuristic which is especially fitted to column generation. Finally, we present computational experiments on several problem classes, e.g., the Vertex Coloring and k-Constrained Shortest Path. Our experiments show, that a straightforward reoptimization, i.e., without additional heuristics, provides no benefit in general. However, in combination with the techniques and methods presented in this thesis, we can accelerate the solving of a given sequence up to the factor 14. For this purpose it is essential to take the differences of the objective functions into account and to restart the reoptimization, i.e., solve the subproblem from scratch, if the objective functions are not similar enough. Finally, we discuss the possibility to parallelize the solving process of the search frontier at the beginning of each solving process. Y1 - 2014 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-54067 ER - TY - THES A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - Effiziente Reoptimierung in Branch&Bound-Verfahren für die Steuerung von Aufzügen N2 - Heutzutage ist eine Vielzahl der mehrstöckigen Gebäude mit Personenaufzugsgruppen ausgestattet. Uns wohl bekannt sind die sogenannten konventionellen Systeme. Bei diesen Systemen betätigt jeder ankommende Passagier eine der beiden Richtungstasten und teilt dem dahinterstehenden Steuerungsalgorithmus seine gewünschte Startetage und Fahrtrichtung mit. Betreten wird der zuerst auf der Startetage ankommende Aufzug mit gleicher Fahrtrichtung und ausreichend Kapazität. Die entsprechende Zieletage wird dem System erst nach dem Betreten der Fahrgastkabine mitgeteilt. Neben diesen konventionellen Systemen gibt es Aufzugsgruppen mit Zielrufsteuerung. Die Besonderheit eines zielrufgesteuerten Systems ist, dass ein ankommender Passagier bereits auf der Startetage seine gewünschte Zieletage angibt und eine Rückmeldung vom System erhält, welchen Aufzug er nutzen soll. Diese Zuweisung durch das System hat das Ziel, die Warte- und Reisezeiten der Passagiere zu minimieren. Ein wesentlicher Faktor bei der Berechnung warte- und reisezeitminimaler Fahrpläne ist das momentane Verkehrsmuster. Eine Einteilung der Verkehrsszenarien lässt sich am besten bei Bürogebäuden vornehmen. So ist es typisch für die Morgenstunden, dass jeder Passagier auf einer Zugangsebene seine Fahrt beginnt und alle Passagiere die gleiche Fahrtrichtung haben. Unter einer Zugangsebene ist z. B. der Haupteingang oder ein Parkdeck zu verstehen. Ein weiterer wesentlicher Punkt bei Zielrufsystemen ist die Art der Zuweisung der Passagiere durch das System. Zum einen gibt es unmittelbar zuweisende (UZ-) Systeme. In einem UZ-System wird nach jeder Ankunft eines Passagiers eine Momentaufnahme des momentanen Verkehrs erstellt und es findet eine Neuplanung und Zuweisung statt. Eine solche Momentaufnahme werden wir im späteren Verkauf als Schnappschussproblem bezeichnen. Jeder Passagier bekommt im Anschluss an die Lösung des Schnappschussproblems eine Mitteilung vom System, z. B. über ein Display, welchen Aufzug er benutzen soll. Zum anderen gibt es verzögert zuweisende (VZ-) Systeme. In diesen Systemen wird die Erstellung und Lösung eines Schnappschussproblems bis kurz vor Ankunft eines Aufzuges auf einer Etage verzögert. In einem VZ-System teilt das System allen wartenden Passagieren die geplanten Zieletagen des ankommenden Aufzugs mit. Jeder Passagier, der einen Ruf getätigt hat und zu einer dieser Zieletagen fahren will, kann jetzt diesen Aufzug betreten. Durch die Verzögerung muss im Vergleich zu einem UZ-System eine weitaus größere Menge von Passagieren zugewiesen werden. Dadurch kann der Lösungsprozess bedeutend aufwändiger werden. Vorteil eines VZ-Systems ist hingegen der größere Freiheitsgrad bei der Optimierung, da aufgrund der späten Zuweisung die weitere Verkehrsentwicklung mit einbezogen werden kann. VZ-Systeme sind aufgrund des größeren Freiheitsgrades interessant für die Praxis ist, wir uns demzufolge in dieser Arbeit mit einer effizienteren Lösung dieser Art von Schnappschussproblemen befassen. Es genügt dabei den Lösungsprozess eines Schnappschussproblems zu betrachten. Das Ziel ist eine Reduzierung der benötigten Rechenzeit. Unter Reoptimierung verstehen wir die Konstruktion zulässiger Spalten in den jeweiligen Iterationsrunden der Spaltengenerierung innerhalb eines Schnappschussproblems. Als eine Iterationsrunde bezeichnet wir einer Menge zulässiger Touren mit negativen reduzierten Kosten. Eine effiziente Reoptimierung zeichnet sich durch die Wiederverwendung und Aufbereitung von Informationen aus vorangegangenen Iterationsrunden desselben Schnappschussproblems aus. Zu den wichtigen Informationen gehört der konstruierte Suchbaum der vorherigen Iterationsrunde mit seinen ausgeloteten (abgeschnittenen) Blättern sowie konstruierten Touren bzw. Spalten, welche in der Iterationsrunde ihrer Konstruktion nicht zur Lösung des Teilproblems der Spaltengenerierung beitrugen. Eine solche Wiederverwendung und Aufbereitung von Informationen nennen wir Warmstart. Y1 - 2013 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-42210 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hiller, Benjamin A1 - Klug, Torsten A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - Reoptimization in branch-and-bound algorithms with an application to elevator control N2 - We consider reoptimization (i.e. the solution of a problem based on information available from solving a similar problem) for branch-and-bound algorithms and propose a generic framework to construct a reoptimizing branch-and-bound algorithm. We apply this to an elevator scheduling algorithm solving similar subproblems to generate columns using branch-and-bound. Our results indicate that reoptimization techniques can substantially reduce the running times of the overall algorithm. T3 - ZIB-Report - 13-15 KW - reoptimization KW - branch-and-bound KW - column generation KW - elevator control Y1 - 2013 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-17876 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Witzig, Jakob A1 - Berthold, Timo T1 - Conflict Analysis for MINLP JF - INFORMS Journal on Computing N2 - The generalization of MIP techniques to deal with nonlinear, potentially non-convex, constraints have been a fruitful direction of research for computational MINLP in the last decade. In this paper, we follow that path in order to extend another essential subroutine of modern MIP solvers towards the case of nonlinear optimization: the analysis of infeasible subproblems for learning additional valid constraints. To this end, we derive two different strategies, geared towards two different solution approaches. These are using local dual proofs of infeasibility for LP-based branch-and-bound and the creation of nonlinear dual proofs for NLP-based branch-and-bound, respectively. We discuss implementation details of both approaches and present an extensive computational study, showing that both techniques can significantly enhance performance when solving MINLPs to global optimality. Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2020.1050 VL - 33 IS - 2 SP - 421 EP - 435 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Berthold, Timo A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - Conflict Analysis for MINLP N2 - The generalization of MIP techniques to deal with nonlinear, potentially non-convex, constraints have been a fruitful direction of research for computational MINLP in the last decade. In this paper, we follow that path in order to extend another essential subroutine of modern MIP solvers towards the case of nonlinear optimization: the analysis of infeasible subproblems for learning additional valid constraints. To this end, we derive two different strategies, geared towards two different solution approaches. These are using local dual proofs of infeasibility for LP-based branch-and-bound and the creation of nonlinear dual proofs for NLP-based branch-and-bound, respectively. We discuss implementation details of both approaches and present an extensive computational study, showing that both techniques can significantly enhance performance when solving MINLPs to global optimality. T3 - ZIB-Report - 20-20 Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-78964 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Witzig, Jakob A1 - Berthold, Timo T1 - Conflict-Free Learning for Mixed Integer Programming N2 - Conflict learning plays an important role in solving mixed integer programs (MIPs) and is implemented in most major MIP solvers. A major step for MIP conflict learning is to aggregate the LP relaxation of an infeasible subproblem to a single globally valid constraint, the dual proof, that proves infeasibility within the local bounds. Among others, one way of learning is to add these constraints to the problem formulation for the remainder of the search. We suggest to not restrict this procedure to infeasible subproblems, but to also use global proof constraints from subproblems that are not (yet) infeasible, but can be expected to be pruned soon. As a special case, we also consider learning from integer feasible LP solutions. First experiments of this conflict-free learning strategy show promising results on the MIPLIB2017 benchmark set. T3 - ZIB-Report - 19-59 KW - mixed integer programming KW - conflict analysis KW - dual proof analysis KW - no-good learning KW - solution learning Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-75338 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Witzig, Jakob A1 - Gleixner, Ambros T1 - Conflict-Driven Heuristics for Mixed Integer Programming JF - INFORMS Journal on Computing N2 - Two essential ingredients of modern mixed-integer programming (MIP) solvers are diving heuristics that simulate a partial depth-first search in a branch-and-bound search tree and conflict analysis of infeasible subproblems to learn valid constraints. So far, these techniques have mostly been studied independently: primal heuristics under the aspect of finding high-quality feasible solutions early during the solving process and conflict analysis for fathoming nodes of the search tree and improving the dual bound. Here, we combine both concepts in two different ways. First, we develop a diving heuristic that targets the generation of valid conflict constraints from the Farkas dual. We show that in the primal this is equivalent to the optimistic strategy of diving towards the best bound with respect to the objective function. Secondly, we use information derived from conflict analysis to enhance the search of a diving heuristic akin to classical coefficient diving. The computational performance of both methods is evaluated using an implementation in the source-open MIP solver SCIP. Experiments are carried out on publicly available test sets including Miplib 2010 and Cor@l. Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2020.0973 VL - 33 IS - 2 SP - 706 EP - 720 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Witzig, Jakob A1 - Berthold, Timo T1 - Conflict-Free Learning for Mixed Integer Programming T2 - Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming. CPAIOR 2020 N2 - Conflict learning plays an important role in solving mixed integer programs (MIPs) and is implemented in most major MIP solvers. A major step for MIP conflict learning is to aggregate the LP relaxation of an infeasible subproblem to a single globally valid constraint, the dual proof, that proves infeasibility within the local bounds. Among others, one way of learning is to add these constraints to the problem formulation for the remainder of the search. We suggest to not restrict this procedure to infeasible subproblems, but to also use global proof constraints from subproblems that are not (yet) infeasible, but can be expected to be pruned soon. As a special case, we also consider learning from integer feasible LP solutions. First experiments of this conflict-free learning strategy show promising results on the MIPLIB2017 benchmark set. Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58942-4_34 IS - 12296 SP - 521 EP - 530 PB - Springer, Cham. ER - TY - GEN A1 - Witzig, Jakob A1 - Berthold, Timo A1 - Heinz, Stefan T1 - Computational Aspects of Infeasibility Analysis in Mixed Integer Programming N2 - The analysis of infeasible subproblems plays an important role in solving mixed integer programs (MIPs) and is implemented in most major MIP solvers. There are two fundamentally different concepts to generate valid global constraints from infeasible subproblems. The first is to analyze the sequence of implications, obtained by domain propagation, that led to infeasibility. The result of this analysis is one or more sets of contradicting variable bounds from which so-called conflict constraints can be generated. This concept is called conflict graph analysis and has its origin in solving satisfiability problems and is similarly used in constraint programming. The second concept is to analyze infeasible linear programming (LP) relaxations. Every ray of the dual LP provides a set of multipliers that can be used to generate a single new globally valid linear constraint. This method is called dual proof analysis. The main contribution of this paper is twofold. Firstly, we present three enhancements of dual proof analysis: presolving via variable cancellation, strengthening by applying mixed integer rounding functions, and a filtering mechanism. Further, we provide an intense computational study evaluating the impact of every presented component regarding dual proof analysis. Secondly, this paper presents the first integrated approach to use both conflict graph and dual proof analysis simultaneously within a single MIP solution process. All experiments are carried out on general MIP instances from the standard public test set MIPLIB 2017; the presented algorithms have been implemented within the non-commercial MIP solver SCIP and the commercial MIP solver FICO Xpress. T3 - ZIB-Report - 19-54 Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-74962 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hendel, Gregor A1 - Miltenberger, Matthias A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - Adaptive Algorithmic Behavior for Solving Mixed Integer Programs Using Bandit Algorithms N2 - State-of-the-art solvers for mixed integer programs (MIP) govern a variety of algorithmic components. Ideally, the solver adaptively learns to concentrate its computational budget on those components that perform well on a particular problem, especially if they are time consuming. We focus on three such algorithms, namely the classes of large neighborhood search and diving heuristics as well as Simplex pricing strategies. For each class we propose a selection strategy that is updated based on the observed runtime behavior, aiming to ultimately select only the best algorithms for a given instance. We review several common strategies for such a selection scenario under uncertainty, also known as Multi Armed Bandit Problem. In order to apply those bandit strategies, we carefully design reward functions to rank and compare each individual heuristic or pricing algorithm within its respective class. Finally, we discuss the computational benefits of using the proposed adaptive selection within the \scip Optimization Suite on publicly available MIP instances. T3 - ZIB-Report - 18-36 KW - mixed integer programming KW - primal heuristics KW - multi armed bandit Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-69563 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Berthold, Timo A1 - Stuckey, Peter A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - Local Rapid Learning for Integer Programs N2 - Conflict learning algorithms are an important component of modern MIP and CP solvers. But strong conflict information is typically gained by depth-first search. While this is the natural mode for CP solving, it is not for MIP solving. Rapid Learning is a hybrid CP/MIP approach where CP search is applied at the root to learn information to support the remaining MIP solve. This has been demonstrated to be beneficial for binary programs. In this paper, we extend the idea of Rapid Learning to integer programs, where not all variables are restricted to the domain {0, 1}, and rather than just running a rapid CP search at the root, we will apply it repeatedly at local search nodes within the MIP search tree. To do so efficiently, we present six heuristic criteria to predict the chance for local Rapid Learning to be successful. Our computational experiments indicate that our extended Rapid Learning algorithm significantly speeds up MIP search and is particularly beneficial on highly dual degenerate problems. T3 - ZIB-Report - 18-56 Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-71190 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Witzig, Jakob A1 - Berthold, Timo A1 - Heinz, Stefan T1 - A Status Report on Conflict Analysis in Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming N2 - Mixed integer nonlinear programs (MINLPs) are arguably among the hardest optimization problems, with a wide range of applications. MINLP solvers that are based on linear relaxations and spatial branching work similar as mixed integer programming (MIP) solvers in the sense that they are based on a branch-and-cut algorithm, enhanced by various heuristics, domain propagation, and presolving techniques. However, the analysis of infeasible subproblems, which is an important component of most major MIP solvers, has been hardly studied in the context of MINLPs. There are two main approaches for infeasibility analysis in MIP solvers: conflict graph analysis, which originates from artificial intelligence and constraint programming, and dual ray analysis. The main contribution of this short paper is twofold. Firstly, we present the first computational study regarding the impact of dual ray analysis on convex and nonconvex MINLPs. In that context, we introduce a modified generation of infeasibility proofs that incorporates linearization cuts that are only locally valid. Secondly, we describe an extension of conflict analysis that works directly with the nonlinear relaxation of convex MINLPs instead of considering a linear relaxation. This is work-in-progress, and this short paper is meant to present first theoretical considerations without a computational study for that part. T3 - ZIB-Report - 18-57 Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-71170 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Witzig, Jakob A1 - Berthold, Timo A1 - Heinz, Stefan T1 - A Status Report on Conflict Analysis in Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming T2 - Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming. CPAIOR 2019 N2 - Mixed integer nonlinear programs (MINLPs) are arguably among the hardest optimization problems, with a wide range of applications. MINLP solvers that are based on linear relaxations and spatial branching work similar as mixed integer programming (MIP) solvers in the sense that they are based on a branch-and-cut algorithm, enhanced by various heuristics, domain propagation, and presolving techniques. However, the analysis of infeasible subproblems, which is an important component of most major MIP solvers, has been hardly studied in the context of MINLPs. There are two main approaches for infeasibility analysis in MIP solvers: conflict graph analysis, which originates from artificial intelligence and constraint programming, and dual ray analysis. The main contribution of this short paper is twofold. Firstly, we present the first computational study regarding the impact of dual ray analysis on convex and nonconvex MINLPs. In that context, we introduce a modified generation of infeasibility proofs that incorporates linearization cuts that are only locally valid. Secondly, we describe an extension of conflict analysis that works directly with the nonlinear relaxation of convex MINLPs instead of considering a linear relaxation. This is work-in-progress, and this short paper is meant to present first theoretical considerations without a computational study for that part. Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19212-9_6 VL - 11494 SP - 84 EP - 94 PB - Springer ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hendel, Gregor A1 - Miltenberger, Matthias A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - Adaptive Algorithmic Behavior for Solving Mixed Integer Programs Using Bandit Algorithms T2 - OR 2018: International Conference on Operations Research N2 - State-of-the-art solvers for mixed integer programs (MIP) govern a variety of algorithmic components. Ideally, the solver adaptively learns to concentrate its computational budget on those components that perform well on a particular problem, especially if they are time consuming. We focus on three such algorithms, namely the classes of large neighborhood search and diving heuristics as well as Simplex pricing strategies. For each class we propose a selection strategy that is updated based on the observed runtime behavior, aiming to ultimately select only the best algorithms for a given instance. We review several common strategies for such a selection scenario under uncertainty, also known as Multi Armed Bandit Problem. In order to apply those bandit strategies, we carefully design reward functions to rank and compare each individual heuristic or pricing algorithm within its respective class. Finally, we discuss the computational benefits of using the proposed adaptive selection within the SCIP Optimization Suite on publicly available MIP instances. Y1 - 2018 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Berthold, Timo A1 - Stuckey, Peter A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - Local Rapid Learning for Integer Programs T2 - Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming. CPAIOR 2019 N2 - Conflict learning algorithms are an important component of modern MIP and CP solvers. But strong conflict information is typically gained by depth-first search. While this is the natural mode for CP solving, it is not for MIP solving. Rapid Learning is a hybrid CP/MIP approach where CP search is applied at the root to learn information to support the remaining MIP solve. This has been demonstrated to be beneficial for binary programs. In this paper, we extend the idea of Rapid Learning to integer programs, where not all variables are restricted to the domain {0, 1}, and rather than just running a rapid CP search at the root, we will apply it repeatedly at local search nodes within the MIP search tree. To do so efficiently, we present six heuristic criteria to predict the chance for local Rapid Learning to be successful. Our computational experiments indicate that our extended Rapid Learning algorithm significantly speeds up MIP search and is particularly beneficial on highly dual degenerate problems. Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19212-9_5 VL - 11494 SP - 67 EP - 83 PB - Springer ER - TY - GEN A1 - Maher, Stephen J. A1 - Fischer, Tobias A1 - Gally, Tristan A1 - Gamrath, Gerald A1 - Gleixner, Ambros A1 - Gottwald, Robert Lion A1 - Hendel, Gregor A1 - Koch, Thorsten A1 - Lübbecke, Marco A1 - Miltenberger, Matthias A1 - Müller, Benjamin A1 - Pfetsch, Marc A1 - Puchert, Christian A1 - Rehfeldt, Daniel A1 - Schenker, Sebastian A1 - Schwarz, Robert A1 - Serrano, Felipe A1 - Shinano, Yuji A1 - Weninger, Dieter A1 - Witt, Jonas T. A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - The SCIP Optimization Suite 4.0 N2 - The SCIP Optimization Suite is a powerful collection of optimization software that consists of the branch-cut-and-price framework and mixed-integer programming solver SCIP, the linear programming solver SoPlex, the modeling language Zimpl, the parallelization framework UG, and the generic branch-cut-and-price solver GCG. Additionally, it features the extensions SCIP-Jack for solving Steiner tree problems, PolySCIP for solving multi-objective problems, and SCIP-SDP for solving mixed-integer semidefinite programs. The SCIP Optimization Suite has been continuously developed and has now reached version 4.0. The goal of this report is to present the recent changes to the collection. We not only describe the theoretical basis, but focus on implementation aspects and their computational consequences. T3 - ZIB-Report - 17-12 Y1 - 2017 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-62170 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Gamrath, Gerald A1 - Fischer, Tobias A1 - Gally, Tristan A1 - Gleixner, Ambros A1 - Hendel, Gregor A1 - Koch, Thorsten A1 - Maher, Stephen J. A1 - Miltenberger, Matthias A1 - Müller, Benjamin A1 - Pfetsch, Marc A1 - Puchert, Christian A1 - Rehfeldt, Daniel A1 - Schenker, Sebastian A1 - Schwarz, Robert A1 - Serrano, Felipe A1 - Shinano, Yuji A1 - Vigerske, Stefan A1 - Weninger, Dieter A1 - Winkler, Michael A1 - Witt, Jonas T. A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - The SCIP Optimization Suite 3.2 N2 - The SCIP Optimization Suite is a software toolbox for generating and solving various classes of mathematical optimization problems. Its major components are the modeling language ZIMPL, the linear programming solver SoPlex, the constraint integer programming framework and mixed-integer linear and nonlinear programming solver SCIP, the UG framework for parallelization of branch-and-bound-based solvers, and the generic branch-cut-and-price solver GCG. It has been used in many applications from both academia and industry and is one of the leading non-commercial solvers. This paper highlights the new features of version 3.2 of the SCIP Optimization Suite. Version 3.2 was released in July 2015. This release comes with new presolving steps, primal heuristics, and branching rules within SCIP. In addition, version 3.2 includes a reoptimization feature and improved handling of quadratic constraints and special ordered sets. SoPlex can now solve LPs exactly over the rational number and performance improvements have been achieved by exploiting sparsity in more situations. UG has been tested successfully on 80,000 cores. A major new feature of UG is the functionality to parallelize a customized SCIP solver. GCG has been enhanced with a new separator, new primal heuristics, and improved column management. Finally, new and improved extensions of SCIP are presented, namely solvers for multi-criteria optimization, Steiner tree problems, and mixed-integer semidefinite programs. T3 - ZIB-Report - 15-60 KW - mixed-integer linear and nonlinear programming KW - MIP solver KW - MINLP solver KW - linear programming KW - LP solver KW - simplex method KW - modeling KW - parallel branch-and-bound KW - branch-cut-and-price framework KW - generic column generation KW - Steiner tree solver KW - multi-criteria optimization KW - mixed-integer semidefinite programming Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-57675 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bestuzheva, Ksenia A1 - Besançon, Mathieu A1 - Chen, Wei-Kun A1 - Chmiela, Antonia A1 - Donkiewicz, Tim A1 - van Doornmalen, Jasper A1 - Eifler, Leon A1 - Gaul, Oliver A1 - Gamrath, Gerald A1 - Gleixner, Ambros A1 - Gottwald, Leona A1 - Graczyk, Christoph A1 - Halbig, Katrin A1 - Hoen, Alexander A1 - Hojny, Christopher A1 - van der Hulst, Rolf A1 - Koch, Thorsten A1 - Lübbecke, Marco A1 - Maher, Stephen J. A1 - Matter, Frederic A1 - Mühmer, Erik A1 - Müller, Benjamin A1 - Pfetsch, Marc E. A1 - Rehfeldt, Daniel A1 - Schlein, Steffan A1 - Schlösser, Franziska A1 - Serrano, Felipe A1 - Shinano, Yuji A1 - Sofranac, Boro A1 - Turner, Mark A1 - Vigerske, Stefan A1 - Wegscheider, Fabian A1 - Wellner, Philipp A1 - Weninger, Dieter A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - The SCIP Optimization Suite 8.0 N2 - The SCIP Optimization Suite provides a collection of software packages for mathematical optimization centered around the constraint integer programming framework SCIP. This paper discusses enhancements and extensions contained in version 8.0 of the SCIP Optimization Suite. Major updates in SCIP include improvements in symmetry handling and decomposition algorithms, new cutting planes, a new plugin type for cut selection, and a complete rework of the way nonlinear constraints are handled. Additionally, SCIP 8.0 now supports interfaces for Julia as well as Matlab. Further, UG now includes a unified framework to parallelize all solvers, a utility to analyze computational experiments has been added to GCG, dual solutions can be postsolved by PaPILO, new heuristics and presolving methods were added to SCIP-SDP, and additional problem classes and major performance improvements are available in SCIP-Jack. T3 - ZIB-Report - 21-41 KW - Constraint integer programming KW - Linear programming KW - Mixed-integer linear programming KW - Mixed-integer nonlinear programming KW - Optimization solver KW - Branch-and-cut KW - Branch-and-price KW - Column generation KW - Parallelization KW - Mixed-integer semidefinite programming Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-85309 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Gamrath, Gerald A1 - Anderson, Daniel A1 - Bestuzheva, Ksenia A1 - Chen, Wei-Kun A1 - Eifler, Leon A1 - Gasse, Maxime A1 - Gemander, Patrick A1 - Gleixner, Ambros A1 - Gottwald, Leona A1 - Halbig, Katrin A1 - Hendel, Gregor A1 - Hojny, Christopher A1 - Koch, Thorsten A1 - Le Bodic, Pierre A1 - Maher, Stephen J. A1 - Matter, Frederic A1 - Miltenberger, Matthias A1 - Mühmer, Erik A1 - Müller, Benjamin A1 - Pfetsch, Marc A1 - Schlösser, Franziska A1 - Serrano, Felipe A1 - Shinano, Yuji A1 - Tawfik, Christine A1 - Vigerske, Stefan A1 - Wegscheider, Fabian A1 - Weninger, Dieter A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - The SCIP Optimization Suite 7.0 N2 - The SCIP Optimization Suite provides a collection of software packages for mathematical optimization centered around the constraint integer programming frame- work SCIP. This paper discusses enhancements and extensions contained in version 7.0 of the SCIP Optimization Suite. The new version features the parallel presolving library PaPILO as a new addition to the suite. PaPILO 1.0 simplifies mixed-integer linear op- timization problems and can be used stand-alone or integrated into SCIP via a presolver plugin. SCIP 7.0 provides additional support for decomposition algorithms. Besides im- provements in the Benders’ decomposition solver of SCIP, user-defined decomposition structures can be read, which are used by the automated Benders’ decomposition solver and two primal heuristics. Additionally, SCIP 7.0 comes with a tree size estimation that is used to predict the completion of the overall solving process and potentially trigger restarts. Moreover, substantial performance improvements of the MIP core were achieved by new developments in presolving, primal heuristics, branching rules, conflict analysis, and symmetry handling. Last, not least, the report presents updates to other components and extensions of the SCIP Optimization Suite, in particular, the LP solver SoPlex and the mixed-integer semidefinite programming solver SCIP-SDP. T3 - ZIB-Report - 20-10 Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-78023 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Gleixner, Ambros A1 - Eifler, Leon A1 - Gally, Tristan A1 - Gamrath, Gerald A1 - Gemander, Patrick A1 - Gottwald, Robert Lion A1 - Hendel, Gregor A1 - Hojny, Christopher A1 - Koch, Thorsten A1 - Miltenberger, Matthias A1 - Müller, Benjamin A1 - Pfetsch, Marc A1 - Puchert, Christian A1 - Rehfeldt, Daniel A1 - Schlösser, Franziska A1 - Serrano, Felipe A1 - Shinano, Yuji A1 - Viernickel, Jan Merlin A1 - Vigerske, Stefan A1 - Weninger, Dieter A1 - Witt, Jonas T. A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - The SCIP Optimization Suite 5.0 N2 - This article describes new features and enhanced algorithms made available in version 5.0 of the SCIP Optimization Suite. In its central component, the constraint integer programming solver SCIP, remarkable performance improvements have been achieved for solving mixed-integer linear and nonlinear programs. On MIPs, SCIP 5.0 is about 41 % faster than SCIP 4.0 and over twice as fast on instances that take at least 100 seconds to solve. For MINLP, SCIP 5.0 is about 17 % faster overall and 23 % faster on instances that take at least 100 seconds to solve. This boost is due to algorithmic advances in several parts of the solver such as cutting plane generation and management, a new adaptive coordination of large neighborhood search heuristics, symmetry handling, and strengthened McCormick relaxations for bilinear terms in MINLPs. Besides discussing the theoretical background and the implementational aspects of these developments, the report describes recent additions for the other software packages connected to SCIP, in particular for the LP solver SoPlex, the Steiner tree solver SCIP-Jack, the MISDP solver SCIP-SDP, and the parallelization framework UG. T3 - ZIB-Report - 17-61 KW - constraint integer programming KW - linear programming KW - mixed-integer linear programming KW - mixed-integer nonlinear programming KW - optimization solver KW - branch-and-cut KW - branch-and-price KW - column generation framework KW - parallelization KW - mixed-integer semidefinite programming KW - Steiner tree optimization Y1 - 2017 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-66297 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Gleixner, Ambros A1 - Bastubbe, Michael A1 - Eifler, Leon A1 - Gally, Tristan A1 - Gamrath, Gerald A1 - Gottwald, Robert Lion A1 - Hendel, Gregor A1 - Hojny, Christopher A1 - Koch, Thorsten A1 - Lübbecke, Marco A1 - Maher, Stephen J. A1 - Miltenberger, Matthias A1 - Müller, Benjamin A1 - Pfetsch, Marc A1 - Puchert, Christian A1 - Rehfeldt, Daniel A1 - Schlösser, Franziska A1 - Schubert, Christoph A1 - Serrano, Felipe A1 - Shinano, Yuji A1 - Viernickel, Jan Merlin A1 - Walter, Matthias A1 - Wegscheider, Fabian A1 - Witt, Jonas T. A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - The SCIP Optimization Suite 6.0 N2 - The SCIP Optimization Suite provides a collection of software packages for mathematical optimization centered around the constraint integer programming framework SCIP. This paper discusses enhancements and extensions contained in version 6.0 of the SCIP Optimization Suite. Besides performance improvements of the MIP and MINLP core achieved by new primal heuristics and a new selection criterion for cutting planes, one focus of this release are decomposition algorithms. Both SCIP and the automatic decomposition solver GCG now include advanced functionality for performing Benders’ decomposition in a generic framework. GCG’s detection loop for structured matrices and the coordination of pricing routines for Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition has been significantly revised for greater flexibility. Two SCIP extensions have been added to solve the recursive circle packing problem by a problem-specific column generation scheme and to demonstrate the use of the new Benders’ framework for stochastic capacitated facility location. Last, not least, the report presents updates and additions to the other components and extensions of the SCIP Optimization Suite: the LP solver SoPlex, the modeling language Zimpl, the parallelization framework UG, the Steiner tree solver SCIP-Jack, and the mixed-integer semidefinite programming solver SCIP-SDP. T3 - ZIB-Report - 18-26 KW - constraint integer programming KW - linear programming KW - mixed-integer linear programming KW - mixed-integer nonlinear programming KW - optimization solver KW - branch-and-cut KW - branch-and-price KW - column generation framework KW - parallelization KW - mixed-integer semidefinite programming KW - Steiner tree optimization Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-69361 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bestuzheva, Ksenia A1 - Besançon, Mathieu A1 - Chen, Wei-Kun A1 - Chmiela, Antonia A1 - Donkiewicz, Tim A1 - Doornmalen, Jasper A1 - Eifler, Leon A1 - Gaul, Oliver A1 - Gamrath, Gerald A1 - Gleixner, Ambros A1 - Gottwald, Leona A1 - Graczyk, Christoph A1 - Halbig, Katrin A1 - Hoen, Alexander A1 - Hojny, Christopher A1 - Hulst, Rolf A1 - Koch, Thorsten A1 - Lübbecke, Marco A1 - Maher, Stephen J. A1 - Matter, Frederic A1 - Mühmer, Erik A1 - Müller, Benjamin A1 - Pfetsch, Marc A1 - Rehfeldt, Daniel A1 - Schlein, Steffan A1 - Schlösser, Franziska A1 - Serrano, Felipe A1 - Shinano, Yuji A1 - Sofranac, Boro A1 - Turner, Mark A1 - Vigerske, Stefan A1 - Wegscheider, Fabian A1 - Wellner, Philipp A1 - Weninger, Dieter A1 - Witzig, Jakob T1 - Enabling research through the SCIP optimization suite 8.0 JF - ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software N2 - The SCIP Optimization Suite provides a collection of software packages for mathematical optimization centered around the constraint integer programming framework SCIP. The focus of this article is on the role of the SCIP Optimization Suite in supporting research. SCIP’s main design principles are discussed, followed by a presentation of the latest performance improvements and developments in version 8.0, which serve both as examples of SCIP’s application as a research tool and as a platform for further developments. Furthermore, this article gives an overview of interfaces to other programming and modeling languages, new features that expand the possibilities for user interaction with the framework, and the latest developments in several extensions built upon SCIP. Y1 - 2023 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1145/3585516 VL - 49 IS - 2 SP - 1 EP - 21 ER -