TY - JOUR A1 - Berthold, Timo A1 - Koch, Thorsten A1 - Shinano, Yuji T1 - MILP. Try. Repeat. JF - Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling - PATAT 2021 Y1 - 2021 VL - 2 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gleixner, Ambros A1 - Hendel, Gregor A1 - Gamrath, Gerald A1 - Achterberg, Tobias A1 - Bastubbe, Michael A1 - Berthold, Timo A1 - Christophel, Philipp M. A1 - Jarck, Kati A1 - Koch, Thorsten A1 - Linderoth, Jeff A1 - Lübbecke, Marco A1 - Mittelmann, Hans A1 - Ozyurt, Derya A1 - Ralphs, Ted A1 - Salvagnin, Domenico A1 - Shinano, Yuji T1 - MIPLIB 2017: Data-Driven Compilation of the 6th Mixed-Integer Programming Library JF - Mathematical Programming Computation N2 - We report on the selection process leading to the sixth version of the Mixed Integer Programming Library. Selected from an initial pool of over 5,000 instances, the new MIPLIB 2017 collection consists of 1,065 instances. A subset of 240 instances was specially selected for benchmarking solver performance. For the first time, the compilation of these sets was done using a data-driven selection process supported by the solution of a sequence of mixed integer optimization problems, which encoded requirements on diversity and balancedness with respect to instance features and performance data. Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s12532-020-00194-3 VL - 13 IS - 3 SP - 443 EP - 490 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Witzig, Jakob A1 - Berthold, Timo T1 - Conflict Analysis for MINLP JF - INFORMS Journal on Computing N2 - The generalization of MIP techniques to deal with nonlinear, potentially non-convex, constraints have been a fruitful direction of research for computational MINLP in the last decade. In this paper, we follow that path in order to extend another essential subroutine of modern MIP solvers towards the case of nonlinear optimization: the analysis of infeasible subproblems for learning additional valid constraints. To this end, we derive two different strategies, geared towards two different solution approaches. These are using local dual proofs of infeasibility for LP-based branch-and-bound and the creation of nonlinear dual proofs for NLP-based branch-and-bound, respectively. We discuss implementation details of both approaches and present an extensive computational study, showing that both techniques can significantly enhance performance when solving MINLPs to global optimality. Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2020.1050 VL - 33 IS - 2 SP - 421 EP - 435 ER -