TY - GEN A1 - Berthold, Timo A1 - Heinz, Stefan A1 - Pfetsch, Marc T1 - Nonlinear pseudo-Boolean optimization: relaxation or propagation? N2 - Pseudo-Boolean problems lie on the border between satisfiability problems, constraint programming, and integer programming. In particular, nonlinear constraints in pseudo-Boolean optimization can be handled by methods arising in these different fields: One can either linearize them and work on a linear programming relaxation or one can treat them directly by propagation. In this paper, we investigate the individual strengths of these approaches and compare their computational performance. Furthermore, we integrate these techniques into a branch-and-cut-and-propagate framework, resulting in an efficient nonlinear pseudo-Boolean solver. T3 - ZIB-Report - 09-11 KW - Pseudo-Boolean KW - constraint integer programming KW - linear relaxation KW - separation algorithm KW - domain propagation Y1 - 2009 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-11232 SN - 1438-0064 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Berthold, Timo A1 - Heinz, Stefan A1 - Pfetsch, Marc T1 - Solving Pseudo-Boolean Problems with SCIP N2 - Pseudo-Boolean problems generalize SAT problems by allowing linear constraints and a linear objective function. Different solvers, mainly having their roots in the SAT domain, have been proposed and compared,for instance, in Pseudo-Boolean evaluations. One can also formulate Pseudo-Boolean models as integer programming models. That is,Pseudo-Boolean problems lie on the border between the SAT domain and the integer programming field. In this paper, we approach Pseudo-Boolean problems from the integer programming side. We introduce the framework SCIP that implements constraint integer programming techniques. It integrates methods from constraint programming, integer programming, and SAT-solving: the solution of linear programming relaxations, propagation of linear as well as nonlinear constraints, and conflict analysis. We argue that this approach is suitable for Pseudo-Boolean instances containing general linear constraints, while it is less efficient for pure SAT problems. We present extensive computational experiments on the test set used for the Pseudo-Boolean evaluation 2007. We show that our approach is very efficient for optimization instances and competitive for feasibility problems. For the nonlinear parts, we also investigate the influence of linear programming relaxations and propagation methods on the performance. It turns out that both techniques are helpful for obtaining an efficient solution method. T3 - ZIB-Report - 08-12 KW - Pseudo-Boolean KW - Constraint Programming KW - Ganzzahlige Programmierung KW - Branch-And-Cut KW - Optimierungssoftware KW - Pseudo-Boolean KW - constraint integer programming KW - integer programming KW - branch-and-cut KW - optimization software Y1 - 2008 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-10671 SN - 1438-0064 ER -