TY - JOUR A1 - Goubergrits, Leonid A1 - Hellmeier, Florian A1 - Bruening, Jan Joris A1 - Spuler, Andreas A1 - Hege, Hans-Christian A1 - Voss, Samuel A1 - Janiga, Gábor A1 - Saalfeld, Sylvia A1 - Beuing, Oliver A1 - Berg, Philipp T1 - Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH): Uncertainty Quantification of Geometric Rupture Risk Parameters JF - BioMedical Engineering OnLine N2 - Background Geometric parameters have been proposed for prediction of cerebral aneurysm rupture risk. Predicting the rupture risk for incidentally detected unruptured aneurysms could help clinicians in their treatment decision. However, assessment of geometric parameters depends on several factors, including the spatial resolution of the imaging modality used and the chosen reconstruction procedure. The aim of this study was to investigate the uncertainty of a variety of previously proposed geometric parameters for rupture risk assessment, caused by variability of reconstruction procedures. Materials 26 research groups provided segmentations and surface reconstructions of five cerebral aneurysms as part of the Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge (MATCH) 2018. 40 dimensional and non-dimensional geometric parameters, describing aneurysm size, neck size, and irregularity of aneurysm shape, were computed. The medians as well as the absolute and relative uncertainties of the parameters were calculated. Additionally, linear regression analysis was performed on the absolute uncertainties and the median parameter values. Results A large variability of relative uncertainties in the range between 3.9 and 179.8% was found. Linear regression analysis indicates that some parameters capture similar geometric aspects. The lowest uncertainties < 6% were found for the non-dimensional parameters isoperimetric ratio, convexity ratio, and ellipticity index. Uncertainty of 2D and 3D size parameters was significantly higher than uncertainty of 1D parameters. The most extreme uncertainties > 80% were found for some curvature parameters. Conclusions Uncertainty analysis is essential on the road to clinical translation and use of rupture risk prediction models. Uncertainty quantification of geometric rupture risk parameters provided by this study may help support development of future rupture risk prediction models. Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0657-y VL - 18 IS - 35 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Oeltze-Jaffra, Steffen A1 - Meuschke, Monique A1 - Neugebauer, Mathias A1 - Saalfeld, Sylvia A1 - Lawonn, Kai A1 - Janiga, Gabor A1 - Hege, Hans-Christian A1 - Zachow, Stefan A1 - Preim, Bernhard T1 - Generation and Visual Exploration of Medical Flow Data: Survey, Research Trends, and Future Challenges JF - Computer Graphics Forum N2 - Simulations and measurements of blood and air flow inside the human circulatory and respiratory system play an increasingly important role in personalized medicine for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. This survey focuses on three main application areas. (1) Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of blood flow in cerebral aneurysms assist in predicting the outcome of this pathologic process and of therapeutic interventions. (2) CFD simulations of nasal airflow allow for investigating the effects of obstructions and deformities and provide therapy decision support. (3) 4D Phase-Contrast (4D PC) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of aortic hemodynamics supports the diagnosis of various vascular and valve pathologies as well as their treatment. An investigation of the complex and often dynamic simulation and measurement data requires the coupling of sophisticated visualization, interaction, and data analysis techniques. In this paper, we survey the large body of work that has been conducted within this realm. We extend previous surveys by incorporating nasal airflow, addressing the joint investigation of blood flow and vessel wall properties, and providing a more fine-granular taxonomy of the existing techniques. From the survey, we extract major research trends and identify open problems and future challenges. The survey is intended for researchers interested in medical flow but also more general, in the combined visualization of physiology and anatomy, the extraction of features from flow field data and feature-based visualization, the visual comparison of different simulation results, and the interactive visual analysis of the flow field and derived characteristics. Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13394 VL - 38 IS - 1 SP - 87 EP - 125 PB - Wiley ER -