@misc{TackMukhopadhyayZachow, author = {Tack, Alexander and Mukhopadhyay, Anirban and Zachow, Stefan}, title = {Knee Menisci Segmentation using Convolutional Neural Networks: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative}, volume = {26}, number = {5}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-68038}, pages = {680 -- 688}, abstract = {Abstract: Objective: To present a novel method for automated segmentation of knee menisci from MRIs. To evaluate quantitative meniscal biomarkers for osteoarthritis (OA) estimated thereof. Method: A segmentation method employing convolutional neural networks in combination with statistical shape models was developed. Accuracy was evaluated on 88 manual segmentations. Meniscal volume, tibial coverage, and meniscal extrusion were computed and tested for differences between groups of OA, joint space narrowing (JSN), and WOMAC pain. Correlation between computed meniscal extrusion and MOAKS experts' readings was evaluated for 600 subjects. Suitability of biomarkers for predicting incident radiographic OA from baseline to 24 months was tested on a group of 552 patients (184 incident OA, 386 controls) by performing conditional logistic regression. Results: Segmentation accuracy measured as Dice Similarity Coefficient was 83.8\% for medial menisci (MM) and 88.9\% for lateral menisci (LM) at baseline, and 83.1\% and 88.3\% at 12-month follow-up. Medial tibial coverage was significantly lower for arthritic cases compared to non-arthritic ones. Medial meniscal extrusion was significantly higher for arthritic knees. A moderate correlation between automatically computed medial meniscal extrusion and experts' readings was found (ρ=0.44). Mean medial meniscal extrusion was significantly greater for incident OA cases compared to controls (1.16±0.93 mm vs. 0.83±0.92 mm; p<0.05). Conclusion: Especially for medial menisci an excellent segmentation accuracy was achieved. Our meniscal biomarkers were validated by comparison to experts' readings as well as analysis of differences w.r.t groups of OA, JSN, and WOMAC pain. It was confirmed that medial meniscal extrusion is a predictor for incident OA.}, language = {en} } @misc{EhlkeFrenzelRammetal., author = {Ehlke, Moritz and Frenzel, Thomas and Ramm, Heiko and Lamecker, Hans and Akbari Shandiz, Mohsen and Anglin, Carolyn and Zachow, Stefan}, title = {Robust Measurement of Natural Acetabular Orientation from AP Radiographs using Articulated 3D Shape and Intensity Models}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-49824}, language = {en} } @misc{EhlkeHeylandMaerdianetal., author = {Ehlke, Moritz and Heyland, Mark and M{\"a}rdian, Sven and Duda, Georg and Zachow, Stefan}, title = {Assessing the Relative Positioning of an Osteosynthesis Plate to the Patient-Specific Femoral Shape from Plain 2D Radiographs}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-54268}, abstract = {We present a novel method to derive the surface distance of an osteosynthesis plate w.r.t. the patient­specific surface of the distal femur based on 2D X­ray images. Our goal is to study from clinical data, how the plate­to­bone distance affects bone healing. The patient­specific 3D shape of the femur is, however, seldom recorded for cases of femoral osteosynthesis since this typically requires Computed Tomography (CT), which comes at high cost and radiation dose. Our method instead utilizes two postoperative X­ray images to derive the femoral shape and thus can be applied on radiographs that are taken in clinical routine for follow­up. First, the implant geometry is used as a calibration object to relate the implant and the individual X­ray images spatially in a virtual X­ray setup. In a second step, the patient­specific femoral shape and pose are reconstructed in the virtual setup by fitting a deformable statistical shape and intensity model (SSIM) to the images. The relative positioning between femur and implant is then assessed in terms of displacement between the reconstructed 3D shape of the femur and the plate. A preliminary evaluation based on 4 cadaver datasets shows that the method derives the plate­to­bone distance with a mean absolute error of less than 1mm and a maximum error of 4.7 mm compared to ground truth from CT. We believe that the approach presented in this paper constitutes a meaningful tool to elucidate the effect of implant positioning on fracture healing.}, language = {en} }