@inproceedings{BorndoerferSchlechteWeider2010, author = {Bornd{\"o}rfer, Ralf and Schlechte, Thomas and Weider, Steffen}, title = {Railway Track Allocation by Rapid Branching}, volume = {14}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Algorithmic Approaches for Transportation Modelling, Optimization, and Systems}, editor = {Erlebach, Thomas and L{\"u}bbecke, Marco}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik}, address = {Dagstuhl, Germany}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.ATMOS.2010.13}, pages = {13 -- 23}, year = {2010}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{BorndoerferSchlechte2008, author = {Bornd{\"o}rfer, Ralf and Schlechte, Thomas}, title = {Solving Railway Track Allocation Problems}, booktitle = {Operations Research Proceedings 2007}, editor = {Kalcsics, J{\"o}rg and Nickel, Stefan}, publisher = {Springer-Verlag}, pages = {117 -- 122}, year = {2008}, language = {en} } @misc{SchlechteTanner2010, author = {Schlechte, Thomas and Tanner, Andreas}, title = {Railway capacity auctions with dual prices}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-11729}, number = {10-10}, year = {2010}, abstract = {Railway scheduling is based on the principle of the construction of a conflict-free timetable. This leads to a strict definition of capacity: in contrast with road transportation, it can be said in advance whether a given railway infrastructure can accommodate - at least in theory - a certain set of train requests. Consequently, auctions for railway capacity are modeled as auctions of discrete goods -- the train slots. We present estimates for the efficiency gain that may be generated by slot auctioning in comparison with list price allocation. We introduce a new class of allocation and auction problems, the feasible assignment problem, that is a proper generalization of the well-known combinatorial auction problem. The feasible assignment class was designed to cover the needs for an auction mechanism for railway slot auctions, but is of interest in its own right. As a practical instance to state and solve the railway slot allocation problem, we present an integer programming formulation, briefly the ACP, which turns out to be an instance of the feasible assignment problem and whose dual problem yields prices that can be applied to define a useful activity rule for the linearized version of the Ausubel Milgrom Proxy auction. We perform a simulation aiming to measure the impact on efficiency and convergence rate.}, language = {en} } @misc{FischerSchlechte2015, author = {Fischer, Frank and Schlechte, Thomas}, title = {Comparing two dual relaxations of large scale train timetabling problems}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-56068}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Railway transportation and in particular train timetabling is one of the basic and source application areas of combinatorial optimization and integer programming. We will discuss two well established modeling techniques for the train timetabling problem. In this paper we focus on one major ingredient - the bounding by dual relaxations. We compare two classical dual relaxations of large scale time expanded train timetabling problems - the Lagrangean Dual and Lagrangean Decomposition. We discuss the convergence behavior and show limitations of the Lagrangean Decomposition approach for a configuration based model. We introduce a third dualization approach to overcome those limitations. Finally, we present promising preliminary computational experiments that show that our new approach indeed has superior convergence properties.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{FischerSchlechte2015, author = {Fischer, Frank and Schlechte, Thomas}, title = {Comparing two dual relaxations of large scale train timetabling problems}, booktitle = {Proceedings of Conference on Advanced Systems in Public Transport 2015}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Railway transportation and in particular train timetabling is one of the basic and source application areas of combinatorial optimization and integer programming. We will discuss two well established modeling techniques for the train timetabling problem. In this paper we focus on one major ingredient - the bounding by dual relaxations. We compare two classical dual relaxations of large scale time expanded train timetabling problems - the Lagrangean Dual and Lagrangean Decomposition. We discuss the convergence behavior and show limitations of the Lagrangean Decomposition approach for a configuration based model. We introduce a third dualization approach to overcome those limitations. Finally, we present promising preliminary computational experiments that show that our new approach indeed has superior convergence properties.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{BlancoSchlechte2014, author = {Blanco, Marco and Schlechte, Thomas}, title = {Analysis of Micro-Macro Transformations of Railway Networks}, booktitle = {Operations Research Proceedings 2013}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-07001-8_6}, pages = {37 -- 42}, year = {2014}, abstract = {A common technique in the solution of large or complex optimization problems is the use of micro-macro transformations. In this paper, we carry out a theoretical analysis of such transformations for the track allocation problem in railway networks. We prove that the cumulative rounding technique of Schlechte et al. satisfies two of three natural optimality criteria and that this performance cannot be improved. We also show that under extreme circumstances, this technique can perform inconveniently by underestimating the global optimal value.}, language = {en} }