@phdthesis{Kainmueller2013, author = {Kainm{\"u}ller, Dagmar}, title = {Deformable Meshes for Accurate Automatic Segmentation of Medical Image Data}, year = {2013}, language = {en} } @misc{Bindernagel2013, type = {Master Thesis}, author = {Bindernagel, Matthias}, title = {Articulated Statistical Shape Models}, year = {2013}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{BindernagelKainmuellerSeimetal.2011, author = {Bindernagel, Matthias and Kainm{\"u}ller, Dagmar and Seim, Heiko and Lamecker, Hans and Zachow, Stefan and Hege, Hans-Christian}, title = {An Articulated Statistical Shape Model of the Human Knee}, booktitle = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2011}, publisher = {Springer}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-19335-4_14}, pages = {59 -- 63}, year = {2011}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{SeimKainmuellerLameckeretal.2010, author = {Seim, Heiko and Kainm{\"u}ller, Dagmar and Lamecker, Hans and Bindernagel, Matthias and Malinowski, Jana and Zachow, Stefan}, title = {Model-based Auto-Segmentation of Knee Bones and Cartilage in MRI Data}, booktitle = {Proc. MICCAI Workshop Medical Image Analysis for the Clinic}, editor = {v. Ginneken, B.}, pages = {215 -- 223}, year = {2010}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{KainmuellerLameckerSeimetal.2010, author = {Kainm{\"u}ller, Dagmar and Lamecker, Hans and Seim, Heiko and Zachow, Stefan and Hege, Hans-Christian}, title = {Improving Deformable Surface Meshes through Omni-directional Displacements and MRFs}, volume = {6361}, booktitle = {Proc. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI)}, editor = {Navab, Tianzi and P. W. Pluim, Josien and Viergever, Max}, publisher = {Springer}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-15705-9_28}, pages = {227 -- 234}, year = {2010}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{KainmuellerLameckerZachowetal.2009, author = {Kainm{\"u}ller, Dagmar and Lamecker, Hans and Zachow, Stefan and Hege, Hans-Christian}, title = {An Articulated Statistical Shape Model for Accurate Hip Joint Segmentation}, booktitle = {EBMC 2009. Int. Conf. of the IEEE Eng. in Med. and Biol. Society (EMBC)}, address = {Minneapolis, USA}, pages = {6345 -- 6351}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{SeimKainmuellerHelleretal.2009, author = {Seim, Heiko and Kainm{\"u}ller, Dagmar and Heller, Markus O. and Zachow, Stefan and Hege, Hans-Christian}, title = {Automatic Extraction of Anatomical Landmarks from Medical Image Data: An Evaluation of Different Methods}, booktitle = {Proc. of IEEE Int. Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)}, address = {Boston, MA, USA}, pages = {538 -- 541}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @article{KainmuellerLameckerZachow2009, author = {Kainm{\"u}ller, Dagmar and Lamecker, Hans and Zachow, Stefan}, title = {Multi-object Segmentation with Coupled Deformable Models}, volume = {5}, journal = {Annals of the British Machine Vision Association (BMVA)}, pages = {1 -- 10}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{KainmuellerLameckerZachowetal.2008, author = {Kainm{\"u}ller, Dagmar and Lamecker, Hans and Zachow, Stefan and Hege, Hans-Christian}, title = {Coupling Deformable Models for Multi-object Segmentation}, booktitle = {Proc. Int. Symp. on Computational Models for Biomedical Simulation (ISBMS)}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-540-70521-5_8}, pages = {69 -- 78}, year = {2008}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{KainmuellerLameckerZachowetal.2008, author = {Kainm{\"u}ller, Dagmar and Lamecker, Hans and Zachow, Stefan and Heller, Markus O. and Hege, Hans-Christian}, title = {Multi-Object Segmentation with Coupled Deformable Models}, booktitle = {Proc. Medical Image Understanding and Analysis}, pages = {34 -- 38}, year = {2008}, language = {en} } @article{KainmuellerLameckerSeimetal.2009, author = {Kainm{\"u}ller, Dagmar and Lamecker, Hans and Seim, Heiko and Zachow, Stefan}, title = {Multi-object segmentation of head bones}, journal = {MIDAS Journal}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{SeimKainmuellerLameckeretal.2009, author = {Seim, Heiko and Kainm{\"u}ller, Dagmar and Lamecker, Hans and Zachow, Stefan}, title = {A System for Unsupervised Extraction of Orthopaedic Parameters from CT Data}, booktitle = {GI Workshop Softwareassistenten - Computerunterst{\"u}tzung f{\"u}r die medizinische Diagnose und Therapieplanung}, address = {L{\"u}beck, Germany}, pages = {1328 -- 1337}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @article{LubeFlackCotofanaetal.2017, author = {Lube, Juliane and Flack, Natasha and Cotofana, Sebastian and {\"O}zkurtul, Orkun and Woodley, Stephanie and Zachow, Stefan and Hammer, Niels}, title = {Pelvic and lower extremity physiological cross-sectional areas: An MRI study of the living young and comparison to published research literature}, volume = {39}, journal = {Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy}, number = {8}, doi = {10.1007/s00276-016-1807-6}, pages = {849 -- 857}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Purpose: Morphological data pertaining to the pelvis and lower extremity muscles are increasingly being used in biomechanical modeling to compare healthy and pathological conditions. Very few data sets exist that encompass all of the muscles of the lower limb, allowing for comparisons between regions. The aims of this study were to (a) provide physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) data for the pelvic, thigh, and leg muscles in young, healthy participants, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (b) to compare these data with summarized PCSAs obtained from the literature. Materials and Methods: Six young and healthy volunteers participated and were scanned using 3 T MRI. PCSAs were calculated from volumetric segmentations obtained bilaterally of 28 muscles/muscle groups of the pelvis, thigh, and leg. These data were compared to published, summarized PCSA data derived from cadaveric, computed tomography, MRI and ultrasound studies. Results: The PCSA of the pelvis, thigh, and leg muscles tended to be 20-130\% larger in males than in females, except for the gemelli which were 34\% smaller in males, and semitendinosus and triceps surae which did not differ (<20\% different). The dominant and the non-dominant sides showed similar and minutely different PCSA with less than 18\% difference between sides. Comparison to other studies revealed wide ranges within, and large differences between, the cadaveric and imaging PCSA data. Comparison of the PCSA of this study and published literature revealed major differences in the iliopsoas, gluteus minimus, tensor fasciae latae, gemelli, obturator internus, biceps femoris, quadriceps femoris, and the deep leg flexor muscles. Conclusions: These volume-derived PCSAs of the pelvic and lower limb muscles alongside the data synthesised from the literature may serve as a basis for comparative and biomechanical studies of the living and healthy young, and enable calculation of muscle forces. Comparison of the literature revealed large variations in PCSA from each of the different investigative modalities, hampering omparability between studies. Sample size, age, post-mortem changes of muscle tone, chemical fixation of cadaveric tissues, and the underlying physics of the imaging techniques may potentially influence PCSA calculations.}, language = {en} }