@misc{AchterbergBertholdHendel2011, author = {Achterberg, Tobias and Berthold, Timo and Hendel, Gregor}, title = {Rounding and Propagation Heuristics for Mixed Integer Programming}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-29210-1_12}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-13255}, number = {11-29}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Primal heuristics are an important component of state-of-the-art codes for mixed integer programming. In this paper, we focus on primal heuristics that only employ computationally inexpensive procedures such as rounding and logical deductions (propagation). We give an overview of eight different approaches. To assess the impact of these primal heuristics on the ability to find feasible solutions, in particular early during search, we introduce a new performance measure, the primal integral. Computational experiments evaluate this and other measures on MIPLIB~2010 benchmark instances.}, language = {en} } @misc{MaherMiltenbergerPedrosoetal.2016, author = {Maher, Stephen J. and Miltenberger, Matthias and Pedroso, Jo{\~a}o Pedro and Rehfeldt, Daniel and Schwarz, Robert and Serrano, Felipe}, title = {PySCIPOpt: Mathematical Programming in Python with the SCIP Optimization Suite}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-42432-3_37}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-61348}, year = {2016}, abstract = {SCIP is a solver for a wide variety of mathematical optimization problems. It is written in C and extendable due to its plug-in based design. However, dealing with all C specifics when extending SCIP can be detrimental to development and testing of new ideas. This paper attempts to provide a remedy by introducing PySCIPOpt, a Python interface to SCIP that enables users to write new SCIP code entirely in Python. We demonstrate how to intuitively model mixed-integer linear and quadratic optimization problems and moreover provide examples on how new Python plug-ins can be added to SCIP.}, language = {en} } @article{BertholdHendelKoch2017, author = {Berthold, Timo and Hendel, Gregor and Koch, Thorsten}, title = {From feasibility to improvement to proof: three phases of solving mixed-integer programs}, volume = {33}, journal = {Optimization Methods and Software}, number = {3}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis}, doi = {10.1080/10556788.2017.1392519}, pages = {499 -- 517}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Modern mixed-integer programming (MIP) solvers employ dozens of auxiliary algorithmic components to support the branch-and-bound search in finding and improving primal solutions and in strengthening the dual bound. Typically, all components are tuned to minimize the average running time to prove optimality. In this article, we take a different look at the run of a MIP solver. We argue that the solution process consists of three distinct phases, namely achieving feasibility, improving the incumbent solution, and proving optimality. We first show that the entire solving process can be improved by adapting the search strategy with respect to the phase-specific aims using different control tunings. Afterwards, we provide criteria to predict the transition between the individual phases and evaluate the performance impact of altering the algorithmic behaviour of the non-commercial MIP solver Scip at the predicted phase transition points.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{GamrathMelchioriBertholdetal.2015, author = {Gamrath, Gerald and Melchiori, Anna and Berthold, Timo and Gleixner, Ambros and Salvagnin, Domenico}, title = {Branching on Multi-aggregated Variables}, volume = {9075}, booktitle = {Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming. CPAIOR 2015}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-18008-3_10}, pages = {141 -- 156}, year = {2015}, abstract = {In mixed-integer programming, the branching rule is a key component to a fast convergence of the branch-and-bound algorithm. The most common strategy is to branch on simple disjunctions that split the domain of a single integer variable into two disjoint intervals. Multi-aggregation is a presolving step that replaces variables by an affine linear sum of other variables, thereby reducing the problem size. While this simplification typically improves the performance of MIP solvers, it also restricts the degree of freedom in variable-based branching rules. We present a novel branching scheme that tries to overcome the above drawback by considering general disjunctions defined by multi-aggregated variables in addition to the standard disjunctions based on single variables. This natural idea results in a hybrid between variable- and constraint-based branching rules. Our implementation within the constraint integer programming framework SCIP incorporates this into a full strong branching rule and reduces the number of branch-and-bound nodes on a general test set of publicly available benchmark instances. For a specific class of problems, we show that the solving time decreases significantly.}, language = {en} } @article{BertholdHendel2014, author = {Berthold, Timo and Hendel, Gregor}, title = {Shift-and-Propagate}, volume = {21}, journal = {Journal of Heuristics}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1007/s10732-014-9271-0}, pages = {73 -- 106}, year = {2014}, abstract = {In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the design of general purpose primal heuristics for use inside complete mixed integer programming solvers. Many of these heuristics rely on an optimal LP solution, which may take a significant amount of time to find. In this paper, we address this issue by introducing a pre-root primal heuristic that does not require a previously found LP solution. This heuristic, named Shift-and-Propagate , applies domain propagation techniques to quickly drive a variable assignment towards feasibility. Computational experiments indicate that this heuristic is a powerful supplement to existing rounding and propagation heuristics.}, language = {en} } @misc{GamrathKochRehfeldtetal.2014, author = {Gamrath, Gerald and Koch, Thorsten and Rehfeldt, Daniel and Shinano, Yuji}, title = {SCIP-Jack - A massively parallel STP solver}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-52293}, year = {2014}, abstract = {In this article we describe the impact from embedding a 15 year old model for solving the Steiner tree problem in graphs in a state-of-the-art MIP-Framework, making the result run in a massively parallel environment and extending the model to solve as many variants as possible. We end up with a high-perfomance solver that is capable of solving previously unsolved instances and, in contrast to its predecessor, is freely available for academic research.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{WitzigBertholdHeinz2017, author = {Witzig, Jakob and Berthold, Timo and Heinz, Stefan}, title = {Experiments with Conflict Analysis in Mixed Integer Programming}, volume = {10335}, booktitle = {Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming. CPAIOR 2017}, publisher = {Springer}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-59776-8_17}, pages = {211 -- 222}, year = {2017}, abstract = {The analysis of infeasible subproblems plays an import role in solving mixed integer programs (MIPs) and is implemented in most major MIP solvers. There are two fundamentally different concepts to generate valid global constraints from infeasible subproblems. The first is to analyze the sequence of implications obtained by domain propagation that led to infeasibility. The result of the analysis is one or more sets of contradicting variable bounds from which so-called conflict constraints can be generated. This concept has its origin in solving satisfiability problems and is similarly used in constraint programming. The second concept is to analyze infeasible linear programming (LP) relaxations. The dual LP solution provides a set of multipliers that can be used to generate a single new globally valid linear constraint. The main contribution of this short paper is an empirical evaluation of two ways to combine both approaches. Experiments are carried out on general MIP instances from standard public test sets such as Miplib2010; the presented algorithms have been implemented within the non-commercial MIP solver SCIP. Moreover, we present a pool-based approach to manage conflicts which addresses the way a MIP solver traverses the search tree better than aging strategies known from SAT solving.}, language = {en} } @misc{Hendel2015, author = {Hendel, Gregor}, title = {Exploiting Solving Phases for Mixed-Integer Programs}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-42902-1_1}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-57098}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Modern MIP solving software incorporates dozens of auxiliary algorithmic components for supporting the branch-and-bound search in finding and improving solutions and in strengthening the relaxation. Intuitively, a dynamic solving strategy with an appropriate emphasis on different solving components and strategies is desirable during the search process. We propose an adaptive solver behavior that dynamically reacts on transitions between the three typical phases of a MIP solving process: The first phase objective is to find a feasible solution. During the second phase, a sequence of incumbent solutions gets constructed until the incumbent is eventually optimal. Proving optimality is the central objective of the remaining third phase. Based on the MIP-solver SCIP, we demonstrate the usefulness of the phase concept both with an exact recognition of the optimality of a solution, and provide heuristic alternatives to make use of the concept in practice.}, language = {en} } @misc{GleixnerSteffyWolter2015, author = {Gleixner, Ambros and Steffy, Daniel and Wolter, Kati}, title = {Iterative Refinement for Linear Programming}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {10.1287/ijoc.2016.0692}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-55118}, year = {2015}, abstract = {We describe an iterative refinement procedure for computing extended precision or exact solutions to linear programming problems (LPs). Arbitrarily precise solutions can be computed by solving a sequence of closely related LPs with limited precision arithmetic. The LPs solved share the same constraint matrix as the original problem instance and are transformed only by modification of the objective function, right-hand side, and variable bounds. Exact computation is used to compute and store the exact representation of the transformed problems, while numeric computation is used for solving LPs. At all steps of the algorithm the LP bases encountered in the transformed problems correspond directly to LP bases in the original problem description. We show that this algorithm is effective in practice for computing extended precision solutions and that it leads to a direct improvement of the best known methods for solving LPs exactly over the rational numbers. Our implementation is publically available as an extension of the academic LP solver SoPlex.}, language = {en} } @misc{GamrathBertholdHeinzetal.2015, author = {Gamrath, Gerald and Berthold, Timo and Heinz, Stefan and Winkler, Michael}, title = {Structure-based primal heuristics for mixed integer programming}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55420-2_3}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-55518}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Primal heuristics play an important role in the solving of mixed integer programs (MIPs). They help to reach optimality faster and provide good feasible solutions early in the solving process. In this paper, we present two new primal heuristics which take into account global structures available within MIP solvers to construct feasible solutions at the beginning of the solving process. These heuristics follow a large neighborhood search (LNS) approach and use global structures to define a neighborhood that is with high probability significantly easier to process while (hopefully) still containing good feasible solutions. The definition of the neighborhood is done by iteratively fixing variables and propagating these fixings. Thereby, fixings are determined based on the predicted impact they have on the subsequent domain propagation. The neighborhood is solved as a sub-MIP and solutions are transferred back to the original problem. Our computational experiments on standard MIP test sets show that the proposed heuristics find solutions for about every third instance and therewith help to improve the average solving time.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{GamrathHillerWitzig2015, author = {Gamrath, Gerald and Hiller, Benjamin and Witzig, Jakob}, title = {Reoptimization Techniques in MIP Solvers}, volume = {9125}, edition = {Experimental Algorithms, Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, publisher = {Springer}, isbn = {978-3-319-20086-6}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-20086-6_14}, pages = {181 -- 192}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Recently, there have been many successful applications of optimization algorithms that solve a sequence of quite similar mixed-integer programs (MIPs) as subproblems. Traditionally, each problem in the sequence is solved from scratch. In this paper we consider reoptimization techniques that try to benefit from information obtained by solving previous problems of the sequence. We focus on the case that subsequent MIPs differ only in the objective function or that the feasible region is reduced. We propose extensions of the very complex branch-and-bound algorithms employed by general MIP solvers based on the idea to ``warmstart'' using the final search frontier of the preceding solver run. We extend the academic MIP solver SCIP by these techniques to obtain a reoptimizing branch-and-bound solver and report computational results which show the effectiveness of the approach.}, language = {en} } @misc{GamrathBertholdHeinzetal.2017, author = {Gamrath, Gerald and Berthold, Timo and Heinz, Stefan and Winkler, Michael}, title = {Structure-driven fix-and-propagate heuristics for mixed integer programming}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {10.1007/s12532-019-00159-1}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-65387}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Primal heuristics play an important role in the solving of mixed integer programs (MIPs). They often provide good feasible solutions early in the solving process and help to solve instances to optimality faster. In this paper, we present a scheme for primal start heuristics that can be executed without previous knowledge of an LP solution or a previously found integer feasible solution. It uses global structures available within MIP solvers to iteratively fix integer variables and propagate these fixings. Thereby, fixings are determined based on the predicted impact they have on the subsequent domain propagation. If sufficiently many variables can be fixed that way, the resulting problem is solved as an LP and the solution is rounded. If the rounded solution did not provide a feasible solution already, a sub-MIP is solved for the neighborhood defined by the variable fixings performed in the first phase. The global structures help to define a neighborhood that is with high probability significantly easier to process while (hopefully) still containing good feasible solutions. We present three primal heuristics that use this scheme based on different global structures. Our computational experiments on standard MIP test sets show that the proposed heuristics find solutions for about three out of five instances and therewith help to improve several performance measures for MIP solvers, including the primal integral and the average solving time.}, language = {en} } @misc{BertholdHendelKoch2016, author = {Berthold, Timo and Hendel, Gregor and Koch, Thorsten}, title = {The Three Phases of MIP Solving}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {10.1080/10556788.2017.1392519}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-61607}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Modern MIP solvers employ dozens of auxiliary algorithmic components to support the branch-and-bound search in finding and improving primal solutions and in strengthening the dual bound. Typically, all components are tuned to minimize the average running time to prove optimality. In this article, we take a different look at the run of a MIP solver. We argue that the solution process consists of three different phases, namely achieving feasibility, improving the incumbent solution, and proving optimality. We first show that the entire solving process can be improved by adapting the search strategy with respect to the phase-specific aims using different control tunings. Afterwards, we provide criteria to predict the transition between the individual phases and evaluate the performance impact of altering the algorithmic behavior of the MIP solver SCIP at the predicted phase transition points.}, language = {en} } @article{GamrathKochMartinetal.2015, author = {Gamrath, Gerald and Koch, Thorsten and Martin, Alexander and Miltenberger, Matthias and Weninger, Dieter}, title = {Progress in presolving for mixed integer programming}, volume = {7}, journal = {Mathematical Programming Computation}, number = {4}, doi = {10.1007/s12532-015-0083-5}, pages = {367 -- 398}, year = {2015}, abstract = {This paper describes three presolving techniques for solving mixed integer programming problems (MIPs) that were implemented in the academic MIP solver SCIP. The task of presolving is to reduce the problem size and strengthen the formulation, mainly by eliminating redundant information and exploiting problem structures. The first method fixes continuous singleton columns and extends results known from duality fixing. The second analyzes and exploits pairwise dominance relations between variables, whereas the third detects isolated subproblems and solves them independently. The performance of the presented techniques is demonstrated on two MIP test sets. One contains all benchmark instances from the last three MIPLIB versions, while the other consists of real-world supply chain management problems. The computational results show that the combination of all three presolving techniques almost halves the solving time for the considered supply chain management problems. For the MIPLIB instances we obtain a speedup of 20 \% on affected instances while not degrading the performance on the remaining problems.}, language = {en} }