@article{Maher2015, author = {Maher, Stephen J.}, title = {Solving the integrated airline recovery problem using column-and-row generation}, volume = {50}, journal = {Transportation Science}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1287/trsc.2014.0552}, pages = {216 -- 239}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Airline recovery presents very large and difficult problems requiring high quality solutions within very short time limits. To improve computational performance, the complete airline recovery problem is generally formulated as a series of sequential stages. While the sequential approach greatly simplifies the complete recovery problem, there is no guarantee of global optimality or solution quality. To address this, there has been increasing interest in the development of efficient solution techniques to solve an integrated recovery problem. In this paper, an integrated airline recovery problem is proposed by integrating the schedule, crew and aircraft recovery stages. To achieve short runtimes and high quality solutions, this problem is solved using column-and-row generation. Column-and-row generation achieves an improvement in solution runtimes by reducing the problem size and thereby achieving a faster execution of each LP solve. Further, the results demonstrate that a good upper bound achieved early in the solution process, indicating an improved solution quality with the early termination of the algorithm. This paper also details the integration of the row generation procedure with branch-and-price, which is used to achieve integral optimal solutions. The benefits of applying column-and-row generation to solve the integrated recovery problem are demonstrated with a comparison to a standard column generation technique.}, language = {en} } @misc{ArnoldBertholdHeinzetal.2014, author = {Arnold, Thomas and Berthold, Timo and Heinz, Stefan and Vigerske, Stefan and Henrion, Ren{\´e} and Gr{\"o}tschel, Martin and Koch, Thorsten and Tischendorf, Caren and R{\"o}misch, Werner}, title = {A Jack of all Trades? Solving stochastic mixed-integer nonlinear constraint programs}, volume = {1}, journal = {MATHEON - Mathematics for Key Technologies}, editor = {Deuflhard, Peter and Gr{\"o}tschel, Martin and H{\"o}mberg, Dietmar and Horst, Ulrich and Kramer, J{\"u}rg and Mehrmann, Volker and Polthier, Konrad and Schmidt, Frank and Sch{\"u}tte, Christof and Skutella, Martin and Sprekels, J{\"u}rgen}, publisher = {European Mathematical Society}, doi = {10.4171/137}, pages = {135 -- 146}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Natural gas is one of the most important energy sources in Germany and Europe. In recent years, political regulations have led to a strict separation of gas trading and gas transport, thereby assigning a central role in energy politics to the transportation and distribution of gas. These newly imposed political requirements influenced the technical processes of gas transport in such a way that the complex task of planning and operating gas networks has become even more intricate. Mathematically, the combination of discrete decisions on the configuration of a gas transport network, the nonlinear equations describing the physics of gas, and the uncertainty in demand and supply yield large-scale and highly complex stochastic mixed-integer nonlinear optimization problems. The Matheon project "Optimization of Gas Transport" takes the key role of making available the necessary core technology to solve the mathematical optimization problems which model the topology planning and the operation of gas networks. An important aspect of the academic impact is the free availability of our framework. As a result of several years of research and development, it is now possible to download a complete state-of-the-art framework for mixed-integer linear and nonlinear programming in source code at http://scip.zib.de}, language = {en} } @article{CookKochSteffyetal.2013, author = {Cook, William and Koch, Thorsten and Steffy, Daniel and Wolter, Kati}, title = {A hybrid branch-and-bound approach for exact rational mixed-integer programming}, volume = {5}, journal = {Mathematical Programming Computation}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1007/s12532-013-0055-6}, pages = {305 -- 344}, year = {2013}, abstract = {We present an exact rational solver for mixed-integer linear programming that avoids the numerical inaccuracies inherent in the floating-point computations used by existing software. This allows the solver to be used for establishing theoretical results and in applications where correct solutions are critical due to legal and financial consequences. Our solver is a hybrid symbolic/numeric implementation of LP-based branch-and-bound, using numerically-safe methods for all binding computations in the search tree. Computing provably accurate solutions by dynamically choosing the fastest of several safe dual bounding methods depending on the structure of the instance, our exact solver is only moderately slower than an inexact floating-point branch-and-bound solver. The software is incorporated into the SCIP optimization framework, using the exact LP solver QSopt_ex and the GMP arithmetic library. Computational results are presented for a suite of test instances taken from the MIPLIB and Mittelmann libraries and for a new collection of numerically difficult instances.}, language = {en} } @misc{RalphsShinanoBertholdetal.2016, author = {Ralphs, Ted and Shinano, Yuji and Berthold, Timo and Koch, Thorsten}, title = {Parallel Solvers for Mixed Integer Linear Programming}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-62239}, year = {2016}, abstract = {In this article, we introduce parallel mixed integer linear programming (MILP) solvers. MILP solving algorithms have been improved tremendously in the last two decades. Currently, commercial MILP solvers are known as a strong optimization tool. Parallel MILP solver development has started in 1990s. However, since the improvements of solving algorithms have much impact to solve MILP problems than application of parallel computing, there were not many visible successes. With the spread of multi-core CPUs, current state-of-the-art MILP solvers have parallel implementations and researches to apply parallelism in the solving algorithm also getting popular. We summarize current existing parallel MILP solver architectures.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{WitzigBertholdHeinz2017, author = {Witzig, Jakob and Berthold, Timo and Heinz, Stefan}, title = {Experiments with Conflict Analysis in Mixed Integer Programming}, volume = {10335}, booktitle = {Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming. CPAIOR 2017}, publisher = {Springer}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-59776-8_17}, pages = {211 -- 222}, year = {2017}, abstract = {The analysis of infeasible subproblems plays an import role in solving mixed integer programs (MIPs) and is implemented in most major MIP solvers. There are two fundamentally different concepts to generate valid global constraints from infeasible subproblems. The first is to analyze the sequence of implications obtained by domain propagation that led to infeasibility. The result of the analysis is one or more sets of contradicting variable bounds from which so-called conflict constraints can be generated. This concept has its origin in solving satisfiability problems and is similarly used in constraint programming. The second concept is to analyze infeasible linear programming (LP) relaxations. The dual LP solution provides a set of multipliers that can be used to generate a single new globally valid linear constraint. The main contribution of this short paper is an empirical evaluation of two ways to combine both approaches. Experiments are carried out on general MIP instances from standard public test sets such as Miplib2010; the presented algorithms have been implemented within the non-commercial MIP solver SCIP. Moreover, we present a pool-based approach to manage conflicts which addresses the way a MIP solver traverses the search tree better than aging strategies known from SAT solving.}, language = {en} } @article{VigerskeGleixner2018, author = {Vigerske, Stefan and Gleixner, Ambros}, title = {SCIP: Global Optimization of Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programs in a Branch-and-Cut Framework}, volume = {33}, journal = {Optimization Methods \& Software}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1080/10556788.2017.1335312}, pages = {563 -- 593}, year = {2018}, abstract = {This paper describes the extensions that were added to the constraint integer programming framework SCIP in order to enable it to solve convex and nonconvex mixed-integer nonlinear programs (MINLPs) to global optimality. SCIP implements a spatial branch-and-bound algorithm based on a linear outer-approximation, which is computed by convex over- and underestimation of nonconvex functions. An expression graph representation of nonlinear constraints allows for bound tightening, structure analysis, and reformulation. Primal heuristics are employed throughout the solving process to find feasible solutions early. We provide insights into the performance impact of individual MINLP solver components via a detailed computational study over a large and heterogeneous test set.}, language = {en} } @masterthesis{Viernickel2016, type = {Bachelor Thesis}, author = {Viernickel, Jan Merlin}, title = {Absch{\"a}tzung der Suchbaumgr{\"o}ße und Laufzeit f{\"u}r Branch-and-Bound Algorithmen}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @misc{Gottwald2016, type = {Master Thesis}, author = {Gottwald, Robert Lion}, title = {Experiments with Concurrency and Heuristics in SCIP}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @masterthesis{Roessig2016, type = {Bachelor Thesis}, author = {Roessig, Ansgar}, title = {Formulations and algorithms for the USCCSP}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @misc{Teuchert2017, type = {Master Thesis}, author = {Teuchert, Andreas}, title = {Degeneriertheit im Simplexverfahren}, year = {2017}, language = {de} } @misc{Hendel2015, author = {Hendel, Gregor}, title = {Exploiting Solving Phases for Mixed-Integer Programs}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-42902-1_1}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-57098}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Modern MIP solving software incorporates dozens of auxiliary algorithmic components for supporting the branch-and-bound search in finding and improving solutions and in strengthening the relaxation. Intuitively, a dynamic solving strategy with an appropriate emphasis on different solving components and strategies is desirable during the search process. We propose an adaptive solver behavior that dynamically reacts on transitions between the three typical phases of a MIP solving process: The first phase objective is to find a feasible solution. During the second phase, a sequence of incumbent solutions gets constructed until the incumbent is eventually optimal. Proving optimality is the central objective of the remaining third phase. Based on the MIP-solver SCIP, we demonstrate the usefulness of the phase concept both with an exact recognition of the optimality of a solution, and provide heuristic alternatives to make use of the concept in practice.}, language = {en} } @misc{YokoyamaShinanoTaniguchietal.2014, author = {Yokoyama, Ryohei and Shinano, Yuji and Taniguchi, Syusuke and Ohkura, Masashi and Wakui, Tetsuya}, title = {Optimization of energy supply systems by MILP branch and bound method in consideration of hierarchical relationship between design and operation}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.020}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-49413}, year = {2014}, abstract = {To attain the highest performance of energy supply systems, it is necessary to rationally determine types, capacities, and numbers of equipment in consideration of their operational strategies corresponding to seasonal and hourly variations in energy demands. In the combinatorial optimization method based on the mixed-integer linear programming (MILP), integer variables are used to express the selection, numbers, and on/off status of operation of equipment, and the number of these variables increases with those of equipment and periods for variations in energy demands, and affects the computation efficiency significantly. In this paper, a MILP method utilizing the hierarchical relationship between design and operation variables is proposed to solve the optimal design problem of energy supply systems efficiently: At the upper level, the optimal values of design variables are searched by the branch and bound method; At the lower level, the values of operation variables are optimized independently at each period by the branch and bound method under the values of design variables given tentatively during the search at the upper level; Lower bounds for the optimal value of the objective function are evaluated, and are utilized for the bounding operations at both the levels. This method is implemented into open and commercial MILP solvers. Illustrative and practical case studies on the optimal design of cogeneration systems are conducted, and the validity and effectiveness of the proposed method are clarified.}, language = {en} }