@inproceedings{AchterbergHeinzKoch2008, author = {Achterberg, Tobias and Heinz, Stefan and Koch, Thorsten}, title = {Counting Solutions of Integer Programs Using Unrestricted Subtree Detection}, volume = {5015}, booktitle = {Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems, 5th International Conference, CPAIOR 2008}, editor = {Perron, Laurent and Trick, Michael}, publisher = {Springer}, pages = {278 -- 282}, year = {2008}, language = {en} } @misc{BertholdWitzig2020, author = {Berthold, Timo and Witzig, Jakob}, title = {Conflict Analysis for MINLP}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-78964}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The generalization of MIP techniques to deal with nonlinear, potentially non-convex, constraints have been a fruitful direction of research for computational MINLP in the last decade. In this paper, we follow that path in order to extend another essential subroutine of modern MIP solvers towards the case of nonlinear optimization: the analysis of infeasible subproblems for learning additional valid constraints. To this end, we derive two different strategies, geared towards two different solution approaches. These are using local dual proofs of infeasibility for LP-based branch-and-bound and the creation of nonlinear dual proofs for NLP-based branch-and-bound, respectively. We discuss implementation details of both approaches and present an extensive computational study, showing that both techniques can significantly enhance performance when solving MINLPs to global optimality.}, language = {en} } @misc{WitzigBerthold2019, author = {Witzig, Jakob and Berthold, Timo}, title = {Conflict-Free Learning for Mixed Integer Programming}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-58942-4_34}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-75338}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Conflict learning plays an important role in solving mixed integer programs (MIPs) and is implemented in most major MIP solvers. A major step for MIP conflict learning is to aggregate the LP relaxation of an infeasible subproblem to a single globally valid constraint, the dual proof, that proves infeasibility within the local bounds. Among others, one way of learning is to add these constraints to the problem formulation for the remainder of the search. We suggest to not restrict this procedure to infeasible subproblems, but to also use global proof constraints from subproblems that are not (yet) infeasible, but can be expected to be pruned soon. As a special case, we also consider learning from integer feasible LP solutions. First experiments of this conflict-free learning strategy show promising results on the MIPLIB2017 benchmark set.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{WitzigBerthold2020, author = {Witzig, Jakob and Berthold, Timo}, title = {Conflict-Free Learning for Mixed Integer Programming}, booktitle = {Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming. CPAIOR 2020}, number = {12296}, publisher = {Springer, Cham.}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-58942-4_34}, pages = {521 -- 530}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Conflict learning plays an important role in solving mixed integer programs (MIPs) and is implemented in most major MIP solvers. A major step for MIP conflict learning is to aggregate the LP relaxation of an infeasible subproblem to a single globally valid constraint, the dual proof, that proves infeasibility within the local bounds. Among others, one way of learning is to add these constraints to the problem formulation for the remainder of the search. We suggest to not restrict this procedure to infeasible subproblems, but to also use global proof constraints from subproblems that are not (yet) infeasible, but can be expected to be pruned soon. As a special case, we also consider learning from integer feasible LP solutions. First experiments of this conflict-free learning strategy show promising results on the MIPLIB2017 benchmark set.}, language = {en} } @misc{GamrathAndersonBestuzhevaetal.2020, author = {Gamrath, Gerald and Anderson, Daniel and Bestuzheva, Ksenia and Chen, Wei-Kun and Eifler, Leon and Gasse, Maxime and Gemander, Patrick and Gleixner, Ambros and Gottwald, Leona and Halbig, Katrin and Hendel, Gregor and Hojny, Christopher and Koch, Thorsten and Le Bodic, Pierre and Maher, Stephen J. and Matter, Frederic and Miltenberger, Matthias and M{\"u}hmer, Erik and M{\"u}ller, Benjamin and Pfetsch, Marc and Schl{\"o}sser, Franziska and Serrano, Felipe and Shinano, Yuji and Tawfik, Christine and Vigerske, Stefan and Wegscheider, Fabian and Weninger, Dieter and Witzig, Jakob}, title = {The SCIP Optimization Suite 7.0}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-78023}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The SCIP Optimization Suite provides a collection of software packages for mathematical optimization centered around the constraint integer programming frame- work SCIP. This paper discusses enhancements and extensions contained in version 7.0 of the SCIP Optimization Suite. The new version features the parallel presolving library PaPILO as a new addition to the suite. PaPILO 1.0 simplifies mixed-integer linear op- timization problems and can be used stand-alone or integrated into SCIP via a presolver plugin. SCIP 7.0 provides additional support for decomposition algorithms. Besides im- provements in the Benders' decomposition solver of SCIP, user-defined decomposition structures can be read, which are used by the automated Benders' decomposition solver and two primal heuristics. Additionally, SCIP 7.0 comes with a tree size estimation that is used to predict the completion of the overall solving process and potentially trigger restarts. Moreover, substantial performance improvements of the MIP core were achieved by new developments in presolving, primal heuristics, branching rules, conflict analysis, and symmetry handling. Last, not least, the report presents updates to other components and extensions of the SCIP Optimization Suite, in particular, the LP solver SoPlex and the mixed-integer semidefinite programming solver SCIP-SDP.}, language = {en} } @article{GamrathGleixnerKochetal.2019, author = {Gamrath, Gerald and Gleixner, Ambros and Koch, Thorsten and Miltenberger, Matthias and Kniasew, Dimitri and Schl{\"o}gel, Dominik and Martin, Alexander and Weninger, Dieter}, title = {Tackling Industrial-Scale Supply Chain Problems by Mixed-Integer Programming}, volume = {37}, journal = {Journal of Computational Mathematics}, doi = {10.4208/jcm.1905-m2019-0055}, pages = {866 -- 888}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The modeling flexibility and the optimality guarantees provided by mixed-integer programming greatly aid the design of robust and future-proof decision support systems. The complexity of industrial-scale supply chain optimization, however, often poses limits to the application of general mixed-integer programming solvers. In this paper we describe algorithmic innovations that help to ensure that MIP solver performance matches the complexity of the large supply chain problems and tight time limits encountered in practice. Our computational evaluation is based on a diverse set, modeling real-world scenarios supplied by our industry partner SAP.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{BertholdGleixner2013, author = {Berthold, Timo and Gleixner, Ambros}, title = {Undercover Branching}, volume = {7933}, booktitle = {Experimental Algorithms, 12th International Symposium, SEA 2013, Rome, Italy, June 5-7, 2013, Proceedings}, editor = {Bonifaci, Vincenzo and Demetrescu, Camil and Marchetti-Spaccamela, Alberto}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-38527-8_20}, pages = {212 -- 223}, year = {2013}, abstract = {In this paper, we present a new branching strategy for nonconvex MINLP that aims at driving the created subproblems towards linearity. It exploits the structure of a minimum cover of an MINLP, a smallest set of variables that, when fixed, render the remaining system linear: whenever possible, branching candidates in the cover are preferred. Unlike most branching strategies for MINLP, Undercover branching is not an extension of an existing MIP branching rule. It explicitly regards the nonlinearity of the problem while branching on integer variables with a fractional relaxation solution. Undercover branching can be naturally combined with any variable-based branching rule. We present computational results on a test set of general MINLPs from MINLPLib, using the new strategy in combination with reliability branching and pseudocost branching. The computational cost of Undercover branching itself proves negligible. While it turns out that it can influence the variable selection only on a smaller set of instances, for those that are affected, significant improvements in performance are achieved.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{GleixnerWeltge2013, author = {Gleixner, Ambros and Weltge, Stefan}, title = {Learning and Propagating Lagrangian Variable Bounds for Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming}, volume = {7874}, booktitle = {Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems, 10th International Conference, CPAIOR 2013, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA, May 18-22, 2013}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-38171-3_26}, pages = {355 -- 361}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Optimization-based bound tightening (OBBT) is a domain reduction technique commonly used in nonconvex mixed-integer nonlinear programming that solves a sequence of auxiliary linear programs. Each variable is minimized and maximized to obtain the tightest bounds valid for a global linear relaxation. This paper shows how the dual solutions of the auxiliary linear programs can be used to learn what we call Lagrangian variable bound constraints. These are linear inequalities that explain OBBT's domain reductions in terms of the bounds on other variables and the objective value of the incumbent solution. Within a spatial branch-and-bound algorithm, they can be learnt a priori (during OBBT at the root node) and propagated within the search tree at very low computational cost. Experiments with an implementation inside the MINLP solver SCIP show that this reduces the number of branch-and-bound nodes and speeds up solution times.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{GleixnerSteffyWolter2012, author = {Gleixner, Ambros and Steffy, Daniel and Wolter, Kati}, title = {Improving the Accuracy of Linear Programming Solvers with Iterative Refinement}, booktitle = {ISSAC '12. Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation}, doi = {10.1145/2442829.2442858}, pages = {187 -- 194}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @misc{EiflerGleixnerPulaj2018, author = {Eifler, Leon and Gleixner, Ambros and Pulaj, Jonad}, title = {Chv{\´a}tal's Conjecture Holds for Ground Sets of Seven Elements}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-70240}, year = {2018}, abstract = {We establish a general computational framework for Chv{\´a}tal's conjecture based on exact rational integer programming. As a result we prove Chv{\´a}tal's conjecture holds for all downsets whose union of sets contains seven elements or less. The computational proof relies on an exact branch-and-bound certificate that allows for elementary verification and is independent of the integer programming solver used.}, language = {en} } @article{GleixnerSteffy2020, author = {Gleixner, Ambros and Steffy, Daniel}, title = {Linear Programming using Limited-Precision Oracles}, volume = {183}, journal = {Mathematical Programming}, number = {1-2}, doi = {10.1007/s10107-019-01444-6}, pages = {525 -- 554}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Since the elimination algorithm of Fourier and Motzkin, many different methods have been developed for solving linear programs. When analyzing the time complexity of LP algorithms, it is typically either assumed that calculations are performed exactly and bounds are derived on the number of elementary arithmetic operations necessary, or the cost of all arithmetic operations is considered through a bit-complexity analysis. Yet in practice, implementations typically use limited-precision arithmetic. In this paper we introduce the idea of a limited-precision LP oracle and study how such an oracle could be used within a larger framework to compute exact precision solutions to LPs. Under mild assumptions, it is shown that a polynomial number of calls to such an oracle and a polynomial number of bit operations, is sufficient to compute an exact solution to an LP. This work provides a foundation for understanding and analyzing the behavior of the methods that are currently most effective in practice for solving LPs exactly.}, language = {en} } @article{Pulaj2019, author = {Pulaj, Jonad}, title = {Cutting planes for families implying Frankl's conjecture}, journal = {Mathematics of Computation}, doi = {10.1090/mcom/3461}, year = {2019}, abstract = {We find previously unknown families of sets which ensure Frankl's conjecture holds for all families that contain them using an algorithmic framework. The conjecture states that for any nonempty finite union-closed (UC) family there exists an element of the ground set in at least half the sets of the considered UC family. Poonen's Theorem characterizes the existence of weights which determine whether a given UC family implies the conjecture for all UC families which contain it. We design a cutting-plane method that computes the explicit weights which satisfy the existence conditions of Poonen's Theorem. This method enables us to answer several open questions regarding structural properties of UC families, including the construction of a counterexample to a conjecture of Morris from 2006.}, language = {en} } @misc{Serrano2019, author = {Serrano, Felipe}, title = {Visible points, the separation problem, and applications to MINLP}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-74016}, year = {2019}, abstract = {In this paper we introduce a technique to produce tighter cutting planes for mixed-integer non-linear programs. Usually, a cutting plane is generated to cut off a specific infeasible point. The underlying idea is to use the infeasible point to restrict the feasible region in order to obtain a tighter domain. To ensure validity, we require that every valid cut separating the infeasible point from the restricted feasible region is still valid for the original feasible region. We translate this requirement in terms of the separation problem and the reverse polar. In particular, if the reverse polar of the restricted feasible region is the same as the reverse polar of the feasible region, then any cut valid for the restricted feasible region that \emph{separates} the infeasible point, is valid for the feasible region. We show that the reverse polar of the \emph{visible points} of the feasible region from the infeasible point coincides with the reverse polar of the feasible region. In the special where the feasible region is described by a single non-convex constraint intersected with a convex set we provide a characterization of the visible points. Furthermore, when the non-convex constraint is quadratic the characterization is particularly simple. We also provide an extended formulation for a relaxation of the visible points when the non-convex constraint is a general polynomial. Finally, we give some conditions under which for a given set there is an inclusion-wise smallest set, in some predefined family of sets, whose reverse polars coincide.}, language = {en} }