@misc{BertholdWitzig2020, author = {Berthold, Timo and Witzig, Jakob}, title = {Conflict Analysis for MINLP}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-78964}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The generalization of MIP techniques to deal with nonlinear, potentially non-convex, constraints have been a fruitful direction of research for computational MINLP in the last decade. In this paper, we follow that path in order to extend another essential subroutine of modern MIP solvers towards the case of nonlinear optimization: the analysis of infeasible subproblems for learning additional valid constraints. To this end, we derive two different strategies, geared towards two different solution approaches. These are using local dual proofs of infeasibility for LP-based branch-and-bound and the creation of nonlinear dual proofs for NLP-based branch-and-bound, respectively. We discuss implementation details of both approaches and present an extensive computational study, showing that both techniques can significantly enhance performance when solving MINLPs to global optimality.}, language = {en} } @misc{WitzigBerthold2019, author = {Witzig, Jakob and Berthold, Timo}, title = {Conflict-Free Learning for Mixed Integer Programming}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-58942-4_34}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-75338}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Conflict learning plays an important role in solving mixed integer programs (MIPs) and is implemented in most major MIP solvers. A major step for MIP conflict learning is to aggregate the LP relaxation of an infeasible subproblem to a single globally valid constraint, the dual proof, that proves infeasibility within the local bounds. Among others, one way of learning is to add these constraints to the problem formulation for the remainder of the search. We suggest to not restrict this procedure to infeasible subproblems, but to also use global proof constraints from subproblems that are not (yet) infeasible, but can be expected to be pruned soon. As a special case, we also consider learning from integer feasible LP solutions. First experiments of this conflict-free learning strategy show promising results on the MIPLIB2017 benchmark set.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{WitzigBerthold2020, author = {Witzig, Jakob and Berthold, Timo}, title = {Conflict-Free Learning for Mixed Integer Programming}, booktitle = {Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming. CPAIOR 2020}, number = {12296}, publisher = {Springer, Cham.}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-58942-4_34}, pages = {521 -- 530}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Conflict learning plays an important role in solving mixed integer programs (MIPs) and is implemented in most major MIP solvers. A major step for MIP conflict learning is to aggregate the LP relaxation of an infeasible subproblem to a single globally valid constraint, the dual proof, that proves infeasibility within the local bounds. Among others, one way of learning is to add these constraints to the problem formulation for the remainder of the search. We suggest to not restrict this procedure to infeasible subproblems, but to also use global proof constraints from subproblems that are not (yet) infeasible, but can be expected to be pruned soon. As a special case, we also consider learning from integer feasible LP solutions. First experiments of this conflict-free learning strategy show promising results on the MIPLIB2017 benchmark set.}, language = {en} } @misc{GamrathAndersonBestuzhevaetal.2020, author = {Gamrath, Gerald and Anderson, Daniel and Bestuzheva, Ksenia and Chen, Wei-Kun and Eifler, Leon and Gasse, Maxime and Gemander, Patrick and Gleixner, Ambros and Gottwald, Leona and Halbig, Katrin and Hendel, Gregor and Hojny, Christopher and Koch, Thorsten and Le Bodic, Pierre and Maher, Stephen J. and Matter, Frederic and Miltenberger, Matthias and M{\"u}hmer, Erik and M{\"u}ller, Benjamin and Pfetsch, Marc and Schl{\"o}sser, Franziska and Serrano, Felipe and Shinano, Yuji and Tawfik, Christine and Vigerske, Stefan and Wegscheider, Fabian and Weninger, Dieter and Witzig, Jakob}, title = {The SCIP Optimization Suite 7.0}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-78023}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The SCIP Optimization Suite provides a collection of software packages for mathematical optimization centered around the constraint integer programming frame- work SCIP. This paper discusses enhancements and extensions contained in version 7.0 of the SCIP Optimization Suite. The new version features the parallel presolving library PaPILO as a new addition to the suite. PaPILO 1.0 simplifies mixed-integer linear op- timization problems and can be used stand-alone or integrated into SCIP via a presolver plugin. SCIP 7.0 provides additional support for decomposition algorithms. Besides im- provements in the Benders' decomposition solver of SCIP, user-defined decomposition structures can be read, which are used by the automated Benders' decomposition solver and two primal heuristics. Additionally, SCIP 7.0 comes with a tree size estimation that is used to predict the completion of the overall solving process and potentially trigger restarts. Moreover, substantial performance improvements of the MIP core were achieved by new developments in presolving, primal heuristics, branching rules, conflict analysis, and symmetry handling. Last, not least, the report presents updates to other components and extensions of the SCIP Optimization Suite, in particular, the LP solver SoPlex and the mixed-integer semidefinite programming solver SCIP-SDP.}, language = {en} } @misc{RehfeldtKoch2020, author = {Rehfeldt, Daniel and Koch, Thorsten}, title = {On the exact solution of prize-collecting Steiner tree problems}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-78174}, year = {2020}, language = {en} } @misc{HendelAndersonLeBodicetal.2020, author = {Hendel, Gregor and Anderson, Daniel and Le Bodic, Pierre and Pfetsch, Marc}, title = {Estimating the Size of Branch-And-Bound Trees}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-78144}, year = {2020}, abstract = {This paper investigates the estimation of the size of Branch-and-Bound (B\&B) trees for solving mixed-integer programs. We first prove that the size of the B\&B tree cannot be approximated within a factor of~2 for general binary programs, unless P equals NP. Second, we review measures of the progress of the B\&B search, such as the gap, and propose a new measure, which we call leaf frequency. We study two simple ways to transform these progress measures into B\&B tree size estimates, either as a direct projection, or via double-exponential smoothing, a standard time-series forecasting technique. We then combine different progress measures and their trends into nontrivial estimates using Machine Learning techniques, which yields more precise estimates than any individual measure. The best method we have identified uses all individual measures as features of a random forest model. In a large computational study, we train and validate all methods on the publicly available MIPLIB and Coral general purpose benchmark sets. On average, the best method estimates B\&B tree sizes within a factor of 3 on the set of unseen test instances even during the early stage of the search, and improves in accuracy as the search progresses. It also achieves a factor 2 over the entire search on each out of six additional sets of homogeneous instances we have tested. All techniques are available in version 7 of the branch-and-cut framework SCIP.}, language = {en} } @misc{D'AndreagiovanniMettPulaj2015, author = {D'Andreagiovanni, Fabio and Mett, Fabian and Pulaj, Jonad}, title = {An (MI)LP-based Primal Heuristic for 3-Architecture Connected Facility Location in Urban Access Network Design}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-31204-0_19}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-57139}, year = {2015}, abstract = {We investigate the 3-architecture Connected Facility Location Problem arising in the design of urban telecommunication access networks integrating wired and wireless technologies. We propose an original optimization model for the problem that includes additional variables and constraints to take into account wireless signal coverage represented through signal-to-interference ratios. Since the problem can prove very challenging even for modern state-of-the art optimization solvers, we propose to solve it by an original primal heuristic that combines a probabilistic fixing procedure, guided by peculiar Linear Programming relaxations, with an exact MIP heuristic, based on a very large neighborhood search. Computational experiments on a set of realistic instances show that our heuristic can find solutions associated with much lower optimality gaps than a state-of-the-art solver.}, language = {en} } @misc{BorndoerferGrimmReutheretal.2016, author = {Bornd{\"o}rfer, Ralf and Grimm, Boris and Reuther, Markus and Schlechte, Thomas}, title = {Optimization of Handouts for Rolling Stock Rotations Visualization}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-61430}, year = {2016}, abstract = {A railway operator creates (rolling stock) rotations in order to have a precise master plan for the operation of a timetable by railway vehicles. A rotation is considered as a cycle that multiply traverses a set of operational days while covering trips of the timetable. As it is well known, the proper creation of rolling stock rotations by, e.g., optimization algorithms is challenging and still a topical research subject. Nevertheless, we study a completely different but strongly related question in this paper, i.e.: How to visualize a rotation? For this purpose, we introduce a basic handout concept, which directly leads to the visualization, i.e., handout of a rotation. In our industrial application at DB Fernverkehr AG, the handout is exactly as important as the rotation itself. Moreover, it turns out that also other European railway operators use exactly the same methodology (but not terminology). Since a rotation can have many handouts of different quality, we show how to compute optimal ones through an integer program (IP) by standard software. In addition, a construction as well as an improvement heuristic are presented. Our computational results show that the heuristics are a very reliable standalone approach to quickly find near-optimal and even optimal handouts. The efficiency of the heuristics is shown via a computational comparison to the IP approach.}, language = {en} } @article{GamrathGleixnerKochetal.2019, author = {Gamrath, Gerald and Gleixner, Ambros and Koch, Thorsten and Miltenberger, Matthias and Kniasew, Dimitri and Schl{\"o}gel, Dominik and Martin, Alexander and Weninger, Dieter}, title = {Tackling Industrial-Scale Supply Chain Problems by Mixed-Integer Programming}, volume = {37}, journal = {Journal of Computational Mathematics}, doi = {10.4208/jcm.1905-m2019-0055}, pages = {866 -- 888}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The modeling flexibility and the optimality guarantees provided by mixed-integer programming greatly aid the design of robust and future-proof decision support systems. The complexity of industrial-scale supply chain optimization, however, often poses limits to the application of general mixed-integer programming solvers. In this paper we describe algorithmic innovations that help to ensure that MIP solver performance matches the complexity of the large supply chain problems and tight time limits encountered in practice. Our computational evaluation is based on a diverse set, modeling real-world scenarios supplied by our industry partner SAP.}, language = {en} } @article{HarrodSchlechte2013, author = {Harrod, Steven and Schlechte, Thomas}, title = {A Direct Comparison of Physical Block Occupancy Versus Timed Block Occupancy in Train Timetabling Formulations}, volume = {54}, journal = {Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review}, doi = {10.1016/j.tre.2013.04.003}, pages = {50 -- 66}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Two fundamental mathematical formulations for railway timetabling are compared on a common set of sample problems, representing both multiple track high density services in Europe and single track bidirectional operations in North America. One formulation, ACP, enforces against conflicts by constraining time intervals between trains, while the other formulation, RCHF, monitors physical occupation of controlled track segments. The results demonstrate that both ACP and RCHF return comparable solutions in the aggregate, with some significant differences in select instances, and a pattern of significant differences in performance and constraint enforcement overall.}, language = {en} } @article{BorndoerferKarbsteinPfetsch2012, author = {Bornd{\"o}rfer, Ralf and Karbstein, Marika and Pfetsch, Marc}, title = {Models for Fare Planning in Public Transport}, volume = {160}, journal = {Discrete Applied Mathematics}, number = {18}, doi = {10.1016/j.dam.2012.02.027}, pages = {2591 -- 2605}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @article{DuerFuegenschuhHuhnetal.2006, author = {D{\"u}r, Mirjam and F{\"u}genschuh, Armin and Huhn, Petra and Klamroth, Kathrin and Saliba, Sleman and Tammer, Christiane}, title = {EURO Summer Institute 2006 in Wittenberg}, volume = {28}, journal = {OR News}, pages = {71 -- 72}, year = {2006}, language = {en} }