@misc{OrlowskiWernerWessaely, author = {Orlowski, Sebastian and Werner, Axel and Wess{\"a}ly, Roland}, title = {Estimating trenching costs in FTTx network planning}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-29210-1_15}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-14884}, abstract = {In this paper we assess to which extent trenching costs of an FTTx network are unavoidable, even if technical side constraints are neglected. For that purpose we present an extended Steiner tree model. Using a variety of realistic problem instances we demonstrate that the total trenching cost can only be reduced by about 5 percent in realistic scenarios. This work has been funded by BMBF (German Federal Ministry of Education and Research) within the program "KMU-innovativ".}, language = {en} } @misc{HillerVredeveld, author = {Hiller, Benjamin and Vredeveld, Tjark}, title = {Probabilistic alternatives for competitive analysis}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {10.1007/s00450-011-0149-1}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-15131}, abstract = {In the last 20 years competitive analysis has become the main tool for analyzing the quality of online algorithms. Despite of this, competitive analysis has also been criticized: It sometimes cannot discriminate between algorithms that exhibit significantly different empirical behavior, or it even favors an algorithm that is worse from an empirical point of view. Therefore, there have been several approaches to circumvent these drawbacks. In this survey, we discuss probabilistic alternatives for competitive analysis.}, language = {en} } @misc{HillerVredeveld, author = {Hiller, Benjamin and Vredeveld, Tjark}, title = {Stochastic dominance analysis of Online Bin Coloring algorithms}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-16502}, abstract = {This paper proposes a new method for probabilistic analysis of online algorithms. It is based on the notion of stochastic dominance. We develop the method for the online bin coloring problem introduced by Krumke et al (2008). Using methods for the stochastic comparison of Markov chains we establish the result that the performance of the online algorithm GreedyFit is stochastically better than the performance of the algorithm OneBin for any number of items processed. This result gives a more realistic picture than competitive analysis and explains the behavior observed in simulations.}, language = {en} }