@misc{RiedmuellerBuchholzZittel2025, author = {Riedm{\"u}ller, Stephanie and Buchholz, Annika and Zittel, Janina}, title = {Enhancing Multi-Energy Modeling: The Role of Mixed-Integer Optimization Decisions}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-100329}, year = {2025}, abstract = {The goal to decarbonize the energy sector has led to increased research in modeling and optimizing multi-energy systems. One of the most promising and popular techniques for modeling and solving (multi-)energy optimization problems is (multi-objective) mixed-integer programming, valued for its ability to represent the complexities of integrated energy systems. While the literature often focuses on deriving mathematical formulations and parameter settings, less attention is given to critical post-formulation decisions. Modeling multi-energy systems as mixed-integer linear optimization programs demands decisions across multiple degrees of freedom. Key steps include reducing a real-world multi energy network into an abstract topology, defining variables, formulating the relevant (in-)equalities to represent technical requirements, setting (multiple) objectives, and integrating these elements into a mixed-integer program (MIP). However, with these elements fixed, the specific transformation of the abstract topology into a graph structure and the construction of the MIP remain non-uniquely. These choices can significantly impact user-friendliness, problem size, and computational efficiency, thus affecting the feasibility and efficiency of modeling efforts. In this work, we identify and analyze the additional degrees of freedom and describe two distinct approaches to address them. The approaches are compared regarding mathematical equivalence, suitability for solution algorithms, and clarity of the underlying topology. A case study on a realistic subarea of Berlin's district heating network involving tri-objective optimization for a unit commitment problem demonstrates the practical significance of these decisions. By highlighting these critical yet often overlooked aspects, our work equips energy system modelers with insights to improve computational efficiency, scalability, and interpretability in their optimization efforts, ultimately enhancing the practicality and effectiveness of multi-energy system models.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{RiedmuellerBuchholzZittel2025, author = {Riedm{\"u}ller, Stephanie and Buchholz, Annika and Zittel, Janina}, title = {Enhancing Multi-Energy Modeling: The Role of Mixed-Integer Optimization Decisions}, booktitle = {The 38th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems - ECOS 2025}, arxiv = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14492}, year = {2025}, abstract = {The goal to decarbonize the energy sector has led to increased research in modeling and optimizing multi-energy systems. One of the most promising and popular techniques for modeling and solving (multi-)energy optimization problems is (multi-objective) mixed-integer programming, valued for its ability to represent the complexities of integrated energy systems. While the literature often focuses on deriving mathematical formulations and parameter settings, less attention is given to critical post-formulation decisions. Modeling multi-energy systems as mixed-integer linear optimization programs demands decisions across multiple degrees of freedom. Key steps include reducing a real-world multi energy network into an abstract topology, defining variables, formulating the relevant (in-)equalities to represent technical requirements, setting (multiple) objectives, and integrating these elements into a mixed-integer program (MIP). However, with these elements fixed, the specific transformation of the abstract topology into a graph structure and the construction of the MIP remain non-uniquely. These choices can significantly impact user-friendliness, problem size, and computational efficiency, thus affecting the feasibility and efficiency of modeling efforts. In this work, we identify and analyze the additional degrees of freedom and describe two distinct approaches to address them. The approaches are compared regarding mathematical equivalence, suitability for solution algorithms, and clarity of the underlying topology. A case study on a realistic subarea of Berlin's district heating network involving tri-objective optimization for a unit commitment problem demonstrates the practical significance of these decisions. By highlighting these critical yet often overlooked aspects, our work equips energy system modelers with insights to improve computational efficiency, scalability, and interpretability in their optimization efforts, ultimately enhancing the practicality and effectiveness of multi-energy system models.}, language = {en} } @misc{MehlLindnerBartoszuketal.2025, author = {Mehl, Lukas and Lindner, Niels and Bartoszuk, Karolina and Zittel, Janina}, title = {Prototypical warm-starts for demand-robust LP-based energy system optimization}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-101242}, year = {2025}, abstract = {The expressiveness of energy system optimization models (ESOMs) depends on a multitude of exogenous parameters. For example, sound estimates of the future energy demand are essential to enable qualified decisions on long-term investments. However, the enormous demand fluctuations even on a fine-grained scale diminish the computational performance of large-scale ESOMs. We therefore propose a clustering-and-decomposition method for linear programming based ESOMs that first identifies and solves prototypical demand scenarios with the dual simplex algorithm, and then composes dual optimal prototype bases to a warm-start basis for the full model. We evaluate the feasibility and computational efficiency our approach on a real-world case study, using a sector-coupled ESOM with hourly resolution for the Berlin-Brandenburg area in Germany, based on the oemof framework.}, language = {en} } @misc{RiedmuellerZittelKoch2025, author = {Riedm{\"u}ller, Stephanie and Zittel, Janina and Koch, Thorsten}, title = {Warm-starting Strategies in Scalarization Methods for Multi-Objective Optimization}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-101073}, year = {2025}, abstract = {We explore how warm-starting strategies can be integrated into scalarization-based approaches for multi-objective optimization in (mixed) integer linear programming. Scalarization methods remain widely used classical techniques to compute Pareto-optimal solutions in applied settings. They are favored due to their algorithmic simplicity and broad applicability across continuous and integer programs with an arbitrary number of objectives. While warm-starting has been applied in this context before, a systematic methodology and analysis remain lacking. We address this gap by providing a theoretical characterization of warm-starting within scalarization methods, focusing on the sequencing of subproblems. However, optimizing the order of subproblems to maximize warm-start efficiency may conflict with alternative criteria, such as early identification of infeasible regions. We quantify these trade-offs through an extensive computational study.}, language = {en} } @article{PetkovicZittel2025, author = {Petkovic, Milena and Zittel, Janina}, title = {Leveraging Transfer Learning to Overcome Data Limitations in Czochralski Crystal Growth}, volume = {8}, journal = {Advanced Theory and Simulations}, number = {11}, doi = {10.1002/adts.202500677}, year = {2025}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{RiedmuellerRivettaZittel2025, author = {Riedm{\"u}ller, Stephanie and Rivetta, Fabian and Zittel, Janina}, title = {Long-Term Multi-Objective Optimization for Integrated Unit Commitment and Investment Planning for District Heating Networks}, booktitle = {Operations Research Proceedings 2024}, publisher = {Springer Cham}, arxiv = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.06673}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-92575-7_33}, pages = {235 -- 241}, year = {2025}, abstract = {The need to decarbonize the energy system has intensified the focus on district heating networks in urban and suburban areas. Therefore, exploring transformation pathways with reasonable trade-offs between economic viability and environmental goals became necessary. We introduce a network-flow-based model class integrating unit commitment and long-term investment planning for multi-energy systems. While the integration of unit commitment and investment planning has been applied to multi-energy systems, a formal introduction and suitability for the application of long-term portfolio planning of an energy provider on an urban scale has yet to be met. Based on mixed integer linear programming, the model bridges the gap between overly detailed industrial modeling tools not designed for computational efficiency at scale and rather abstract academic models. The formulation is tested on Berlin's district heating network. Hence, the challenge lies in a large number of variables and constraints and the coupling of time steps, for example, through investment decisions. A case study explores different solutions on the Pareto front defined by optimal trade-offs between minimizing costs and CO2 emissions through a lexicographic optimization approach. The resulting solution catalog can provide decision-makers valuable insights into feasible transformation pathways, highlighting distinctions between robust and target-dependent investments.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{PetkovicZittel2025, author = {Petkovic, Milena and Zittel, Janina}, title = {Resilient Forecasting of High-Dimensional Network Time Series in the Energy Domain: A Hybrid Approach}, booktitle = {Operations Research Proceedings 2023. OR 2023}, publisher = {Springer}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-58405-3_48}, pages = {375 -- 381}, year = {2025}, abstract = {Energy systems are complex networks consisting of various interconnected components. Accurate energy demand and supply forecasts are crucial for efficient system operation and decision-making. However, high-dimensional data, complex network structures, and dynamic changes and disruptions in energy networks pose significant challenges for forecasting models. To address this, we propose a hybrid approach for resilient forecasting of network time series (HRF-NTS) in the energy domain. Our approach combines mathematical optimization methods with state-of-the-art machine learning techniques to achieve accurate and robust forecasts for high-dimensional energy network time series. We incorporate an optimization framework to account for uncertainties and disruptive changes in the energy system. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated through a case study of forecasting energy demand and supply in a complex, large-scale natural gas transmission network. The results show that the hybrid approach outperforms alternative prediction models in terms of accuracy and resilience to structural changes and disruptions, providing stable, multi-step ahead forecasts for different short to mid-term forecasting horizons.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{YuekselErguenKochZittel2025, author = {Yueksel-Erguen, Inci and Koch, Thorsten and Zittel, Janina}, title = {Consistent flow scenario generation based on open data for operational analysis of European gas transport networks}, booktitle = {Operations Research Proceedings 2023. OR 2023}, publisher = {Springer}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-58405-3_63}, pages = {493 -- 499}, year = {2025}, abstract = {In recent years, European gas transport has been affected by major disruptive events like political issues such as, most recently, the Russian war on Ukraine. To incorporate the impacts of such events into decision-making during the energy transition, more complex models for gas network analysis are required. However, the limited availability of consistent data presents a significant obstacle in this endeavor. We use a mathematical-modeling-based scenario generator to deal with this obstacle. The scenario generator consists of capacitated network flow models representing the gas network at different aggregation levels. In this study, we present the coarse-to-fine approach utilized in this scenario generator.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{LindnerBartoszukDebguptaetal.2025, author = {Lindner, Niels and Bartoszuk, Karolina and Debgupta, Srinwanti and Gering, Marie-Claire and Muschner, Christoph and Zittel, Janina}, title = {Warm-starting modeling to generate alternatives for energy transition paths in the Berlin-Brandenburg area}, booktitle = {Operations Research Proceedings 2024. OR 2024}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-92575-7_35}, pages = {248 -- 253}, year = {2025}, abstract = {Energy system optimization models are key to investigate energy transition paths towards a decarbonized future. Since this approach comes with intrinsic uncertainties, it is insufficient to compute a single optimal solution assuming perfect foresight to provide a profound basis for decision makers. The paradigm of modeling to generate alternatives enables to explore the near-optimal solution space to a certain extent. However, large-scale energy models require a non-negligible computation time to be solved. We propose to use warm start methods to accelerate the process of finding close-to-optimal alternatives. In an extensive case study for the energy transition of the Berlin-Brandenburg area, we make use of the sector-coupled linear programming oemof-B3 model to analyze a scenario for the year 2050 with a resolution of one hour and 100\% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. We demonstrate that we can actually achieve a significant computational speedup.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{StomporZittelKochetal.2025, author = {Stompor, Tomasz and Zittel, Janina and Koch, Thorsten and Rusch, Beate}, title = {Fully Algorithmic Librarian: Large-Scale Citation Experiments}, booktitle = {20th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference 2025, June 23-27, 2025 | Yerevan, Armenia}, doi = {10.51408/issi2025_204}, year = {2025}, abstract = {The Fully Algorithmic Librarian (FAN) project explores application scenarios for algorithmic-intelligence(AI)-supported methods in academic libraries as central institutions for research support. To this end, the study builds on two algorithmic approaches for analyzing large-scale citation networks. A comparison of Web of Science (WoS) and OpenAlex structures using the PageRank algorithm reveals key differences. Additionally, a multi-label clustering technique designed for large-scale citation networks accounts for disciplinary variations in publication practices.}, language = {en} } @misc{LindnerMehlBartoszuketal.2025, author = {Lindner, Niels and Mehl, Lukas and Bartoszuk, Karolina and Berendes, Sarah and Zittel, Janina}, title = {Demand Uncertainty in Energy Systems: Scenario Catalogs vs. Integrated Robust Optimization}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-102404}, year = {2025}, abstract = {Designing efficient energy systems is indispensable for shaping a more sustainable society. This involves making infrastructure investment decisions that must be valid for a long-term time horizon. While energy system optimization models constitute a powerful technique to support planning decisions, they need to cope with inherent uncertainty. For example, predicting future demand on a scale of decades is not only an intricate challenge in itself, but small fluctuations in such a forecast might also largely impact the layout of a complex energy system. In this paper, we compare two methodologies of capturing demand uncertainty for linear-programming based energy system optimization models. On one hand, we generate and analyze catalogs of varying demand scenarios, where each individual scenario is considered independently, so that the optimization produces scenario-specific investment pathways. On the other hand, we make use of robust linear programming to meet the demand of all scenarios at once. Since including a multitude of scenarios increases the size and complexity of the optimization model, we will show how to use warm-starting approaches to accelerate the computation process, by exploiting the similar structure of the linear program across different demand inputs. This allows to integrate a meaningful number of demand scenarios with fully-fledged energy system models. We demonstrate the practical use of our methods in a case study of the Berlin-Brandenburg area in Germany, a region that contains both a metropolitan area and its rural surroundings. As a backbone, we use the open-source framework oemof to create a sector-coupled optimization model for planning an energy system with up to 100\% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. This model features a fine-grained temporal resolution of one hour for the full year 2050. We consider uncertainty in demand for electricity, hydrogen, natural gas, central, and decentral heat. Based on our computations, we analyze the trade-offs in terms of quality and computation time for scenario catalogs and the robust optimization approach. We further demonstrate that our procedure provides a valuable strategy for decision makers to gain insight on the robustness and sensitivity of solutions regarding demand variability.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{LindnerMehlBartoszuketal.2025, author = {Lindner, Niels and Mehl, Lukas and Bartoszuk, Karolina and Berendes, Sarah and Zittel, Janina}, title = {Demand Uncertainty in Energy Systems: Scenario Catalogs vs. Integrated Robust Optimization}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems}, year = {2025}, abstract = {Designing efficient energy systems is indispensable for shaping a more sustainable society. This involves making infrastructure investment decisions that must be valid for a long-term time horizon. While energy system optimization models constitute a powerful technique to support planning decisions, they need to cope with inherent uncertainty. For example, predicting future demand on a scale of decades is not only an intricate challenge in itself, but small fluctuations in such a forecast might also largely impact the layout of a complex energy system. In this paper, we compare two methodologies of capturing demand uncertainty for linear-programming based energy system optimization models. On one hand, we generate and analyze catalogs of varying demand scenarios, where each individual scenario is considered independently, so that the optimization produces scenario-specific investment pathways. On the other hand, we make use of robust linear programming to meet the demand of all scenarios at once. Since including a multitude of scenarios increases the size and complexity of the optimization model, we will show how to use warm-starting approaches to accelerate the computation process, by exploiting the similar structure of the linear program across different demand inputs. This allows to integrate a meaningful number of demand scenarios with fully-fledged energy system models. We demonstrate the practical use of our methods in a case study of the Berlin-Brandenburg area in Germany, a region that contains both a metropolitan area and its rural surroundings. As a backbone, we use the open-source framework oemof to create a sector-coupled optimization model for planning an energy system with up to 100\% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. This model features a fine-grained temporal resolution of one hour for the full year 2050. We consider uncertainty in demand for electricity, hydrogen, natural gas, central, and decentral heat. Based on our computations, we analyze the trade-offs in terms of quality and computation time for scenario catalogs and the robust optimization approach. We further demonstrate that our procedure provides a valuable strategy for decision makers to gain insight on the robustness and sensitivity of solutions regarding demand variability.}, language = {en} } @article{ZittelPetkovicEinck2025, author = {Zittel, Janina and Petkovic, Milena and Einck, Mathias}, title = {Forecasting Hourly Gas Flows}, volume = {79}, journal = {Foresight - The International Journal of Applied Forecasting}, pages = {40 -- 44}, year = {2025}, language = {en} }