@misc{RehfeldtKoch2018, author = {Rehfeldt, Daniel and Koch, Thorsten}, title = {SCIP-Jack—a solver for STP and variants with parallelization extensions: An update}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-66416}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The Steiner tree problem in graphs is a classical problem that commonly arises in practical applications as one of many variants. Although the different Steiner tree problem variants are usually strongly related, solution approaches employed so far have been prevalently problem-specific. Against this backdrop, the solver SCIP-Jack was created as a general-purpose framework that can be used to solve the classical Steiner tree problem and 11 of its variants. This versatility is achieved by transforming various problem variants into a general form and solving them by using a state-of-the-art MIP-framework. Furthermore, SCIP-Jack includes various newly developed algorithmic components such as preprocessing routines and heuristics. The result is a high-performance solver that can be employed in massively parallel environments and is capable of solving previously unsolved instances. After the introduction of SCIP-Jack at the 2014 DIMACS Challenge on Steiner problems, the overall performance of the solver has considerably improved. This article provides an overview on the current state.}, language = {en} } @article{BertholdHendelKoch2017, author = {Berthold, Timo and Hendel, Gregor and Koch, Thorsten}, title = {From feasibility to improvement to proof: three phases of solving mixed-integer programs}, volume = {33}, journal = {Optimization Methods and Software}, number = {3}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis}, doi = {10.1080/10556788.2017.1392519}, pages = {499 -- 517}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Modern mixed-integer programming (MIP) solvers employ dozens of auxiliary algorithmic components to support the branch-and-bound search in finding and improving primal solutions and in strengthening the dual bound. Typically, all components are tuned to minimize the average running time to prove optimality. In this article, we take a different look at the run of a MIP solver. We argue that the solution process consists of three distinct phases, namely achieving feasibility, improving the incumbent solution, and proving optimality. We first show that the entire solving process can be improved by adapting the search strategy with respect to the phase-specific aims using different control tunings. Afterwards, we provide criteria to predict the transition between the individual phases and evaluate the performance impact of altering the algorithmic behaviour of the non-commercial MIP solver Scip at the predicted phase transition points.}, language = {en} } @article{SchmidtAssmannBurlacuetal.2017, author = {Schmidt, Martin and Assmann, Denis and Burlacu, Robert and Humpola, Jesco and Joormann, Imke and Kanelakis, Nikolaos and Koch, Thorsten and Oucherif, Djamal and Pfetsch, Marc and Schewe, Lars and Schwarz, Robert and Sirvent, Matthias}, title = {GasLib - A Library of Gas Network Instances}, volume = {2}, journal = {Data}, number = {4}, doi = {10.3390/data2040040}, year = {2017}, language = {en} } @article{Koch2017, author = {Koch, Thorsten}, title = {The ZIMPL modeling language}, volume = {103}, journal = {Optima}, pages = {8 -- 9}, year = {2017}, language = {en} } @misc{RehfeldtKoch2017, author = {Rehfeldt, Daniel and Koch, Thorsten}, title = {Combining NP-Hard Reduction Techniques and Strong Heuristics in an Exact Algorithm for the Maximum-Weight Connected Subgraph Problem}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {10.1137/17M1145963}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-64699}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Borne out of a surprising variety of practical applications, the maximum-weight connected subgraph problem has attracted considerable interest during the past years. This interest has not only led to notable research on theoretical properties, but has also brought about several (exact) solvers-with steadily increasing performance. Continuing along this path, the following article introduces several new algorithms such as reduction techniques and heuristics and describes their integration into an exact solver. The new methods are evaluated with respect to both their theoretical and practical properties. Notably, the new exact framework allows to solve common problem instances from the literature faster than all previous approaches. Moreover, one large-scale benchmark instance from the 11th DIMACS Challenge can be solved for the first time to optimality and the primal-dual gap for two other ones can be significantly reduced.}, language = {en} } @article{RehfeldtKochMaher2019, author = {Rehfeldt, Daniel and Koch, Thorsten and Maher, Stephen J.}, title = {Reduction Techniques for the Prize-Collecting Steiner Tree Problem and the Maximum-Weight Connected Subgraph Problem}, volume = {73}, journal = {Networks}, edition = {2}, publisher = {Wiley}, doi = {10.1002/net.21857}, pages = {206 -- 233}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The concept of reduction has frequently distinguished itself as a pivotal ingredient of exact solving approaches for the Steiner tree problem in graphs. In this paper we broaden the focus and consider reduction techniques for three Steiner problem variants that have been extensively discussed in the literature and entail various practical applications: The prize-collecting Steiner tree problem, the rooted prize-collecting Steiner tree problem and the maximum-weight connected subgraph problem. By introducing and subsequently deploying numerous new reduction methods, we are able to drastically decrease the size of a large number of benchmark instances, already solving more than 90 percent of them to optimality. Furthermore, we demonstrate the impact of these techniques on exact solving, using the example of the state-of-the-art Steiner problem solver SCIP-Jack.}, language = {en} } @article{RehfeldtKoch2018, author = {Rehfeldt, Daniel and Koch, Thorsten}, title = {Transformations for the Prize-Collecting Steiner Tree Problem and the Maximum-Weight Connected Subgraph Problem to SAP}, volume = {36}, journal = {Journal of Computational Mathematics}, number = {3}, doi = {10.4208/jcm.1709-m2017-0002}, pages = {459 -- 468}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Transformations of Steiner tree problem variants have been frequently discussed in the literature. Besides allowing to easily transfer complexity results, they constitute a central pillar of exact state-of-the-art solvers for well-known variants such as the Steiner tree problem in graphs. In this paper transformations for both the prize-collecting Steiner tree problem and the maximum-weight connected subgraph problem to the Steiner arborescence problem are introduced for the first time. Furthermore, we demonstrate the considerable implications for practical solving approaches, including the computation of strong upper and lower bounds.}, language = {en} } @misc{LuceDuintjerTebbensLiesenetal.2009, author = {Luce, Robert and Duintjer Tebbens, Jurjen and Liesen, J{\"o}rg and Nabben, Robert and Gr{\"o}tschel, Martin and Koch, Thorsten and Schenk, Olaf}, title = {On the Factorization of Simplex Basis Matrices}, organization = {TU Berlin, Zuse Institute Berlin, University of Basel}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-11392}, number = {09-24}, year = {2009}, abstract = {In the simplex algorithm, solving linear systems with the basis matrix and its transpose accounts for a large part of the total computation time. We investigate various methods from modern numerical linear algebra to improve the computation speed of the basis updates arising in LPs. The experiments are executed on a large real-world test set. The most widely used solution technique is sparse LU factorization, paired with an updating scheme that allows to use the factors over several iterations. Clearly, small number of fill-in elements in the LU factors is critical for the overall performance. Using a wide range of LPs we show numerically that after a simple permutation the non-triangular part of the basis matrix is so small, that the whole matrix can be factorized with (relative) fill-in close to the optimum. This permutation has been exploited by simplex practitioners for many years. But to our knowledge no systematic numerical study has been published that demonstrates the effective reduction to a surprisingly small non-triangular problem, even for large scale LPs. For the factorization of the non-triangular part most existing simplex codes use some variant of dynamic Markowitz pivoting, which originated in the late 1950s. We also show numerically that, in terms of fill-in and in the simplex context, dynamic Markowitz is quite consistently superior to other, more recently developed techniques.}, language = {en} } @misc{AchterbergBertholdHeinzetal.2008, author = {Achterberg, Tobias and Berthold, Timo and Heinz, Stefan and Koch, Thorsten and Wolter, Kati}, title = {Constraint Integer Programming: Techniques and Applications}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-10950}, number = {08-43}, year = {2008}, abstract = {This article introduces constraint integer programming (CIP), which is a novel way to combine constraint programming (CP) and mixed integer programming (MIP) methodologies. CIP is a generalization of MIP that supports the notion of general constraints as in CP. This approach is supported by the CIP framework SCIP, which also integrates techniques for solving satisfiability problems. SCIP is available in source code and free for noncommercial use. We demonstrate the usefulness of CIP on three tasks. First, we apply the constraint integer programming approach to pure mixed integer programs. Computational experiments show that SCIP is almost competitive to current state-of-the-art commercial MIP solvers. Second, we demonstrate how to use CIP techniques to compute the number of optimal solutions of integer programs. Third, we employ the CIP framework to solve chip design verification problems, which involve some highly nonlinear constraint types that are very hard to handle by pure MIP solvers. The CIP approach is very effective here: it can apply the full sophisticated MIP machinery to the linear part of the problem, while dealing with the nonlinear constraints by employing constraint programming techniques.}, language = {en} } @misc{GamrathKochRehfeldtetal.2014, author = {Gamrath, Gerald and Koch, Thorsten and Rehfeldt, Daniel and Shinano, Yuji}, title = {SCIP-Jack - A massively parallel STP solver}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-52293}, year = {2014}, abstract = {In this article we describe the impact from embedding a 15 year old model for solving the Steiner tree problem in graphs in a state-of-the-art MIP-Framework, making the result run in a massively parallel environment and extending the model to solve as many variants as possible. We end up with a high-perfomance solver that is capable of solving previously unsolved instances and, in contrast to its predecessor, is freely available for academic research.}, language = {en} } @misc{KochMartinPfetsch2013, author = {Koch, Thorsten and Martin, Alexander and Pfetsch, Marc}, title = {Progress in Academic Computational Integer Programming}, journal = {Facets of Combinatorial Optimization}, editor = {J{\"u}nger, Michael and Reinelt, Gerhard}, publisher = {Springer}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-38189-8_19}, pages = {483 -- 506}, year = {2013}, language = {en} }