@article{PimentelSzengelEhlkeetal., author = {Pimentel, Pedro and Szengel, Angelika and Ehlke, Moritz and Lamecker, Hans and Zachow, Stefan and Estacio, Laura and Doenitz, Christian and Ramm, Heiko}, title = {Automated Virtual Reconstruction of Large Skull Defects using Statistical Shape Models and Generative Adversarial Networks}, series = {Towards the Automatization of Cranial Implant Design in Cranioplasty}, volume = {12439}, journal = {Towards the Automatization of Cranial Implant Design in Cranioplasty}, editor = {Li, Jianning and Egger, Jan}, edition = {1}, publisher = {Springer International Publishing}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-64327-0_3}, pages = {16 -- 27}, abstract = {We present an automated method for extrapolating missing regions in label data of the skull in an anatomically plausible manner. The ultimate goal is to design patient-speci� c cranial implants for correcting large, arbitrarily shaped defects of the skull that can, for example, result from trauma of the head. Our approach utilizes a 3D statistical shape model (SSM) of the skull and a 2D generative adversarial network (GAN) that is trained in an unsupervised fashion from samples of healthy patients alone. By � tting the SSM to given input labels containing the skull defect, a First approximation of the healthy state of the patient is obtained. The GAN is then applied to further correct and smooth the output of the SSM in an anatomically plausible manner. Finally, the defect region is extracted using morphological operations and subtraction between the extrapolated healthy state of the patient and the defective input labels. The method is trained and evaluated based on data from the MICCAI 2020 AutoImplant challenge. It produces state-of-the art results on regularly shaped cut-outs that were present in the training and testing data of the challenge. Furthermore, due to unsupervised nature of the approach, the method generalizes well to previously unseen defects of varying shapes that were only present in the hidden test dataset.}, language = {en} } @article{LiPimentelSzengeletal., author = {Li, Jianning and Pimentel, Pedro and Szengel, Angelika and Ehlke, Moritz and Lamecker, Hans and Zachow, Stefan and Estacio, Laura and Doenitz, Christian and Ramm, Heiko and Shi, Haochen and Chen, Xiaojun and Matzkin, Franco and Newcombe, Virginia and Ferrante, Enzo and Jin, Yuan and Ellis, David G. and Aizenberg, Michele R. and Kodym, Oldrich and Spanel, Michal and Herout, Adam and Mainprize, James G. and Fishman, Zachary and Hardisty, Michael R. and Bayat, Amirhossein and Shit, Suprosanna and Wang, Bomin and Liu, Zhi and Eder, Matthias and Pepe, Antonio and Gsaxner, Christina and Alves, Victor and Zefferer, Ulrike and von Campe, Cord and Pistracher, Karin and Sch{\"a}fer, Ute and Schmalstieg, Dieter and Menze, Bjoern H. and Glocker, Ben and Egger, Jan}, title = {AutoImplant 2020 - First MICCAI Challenge on Automatic Cranial Implant Design}, series = {IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging}, volume = {40}, journal = {IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging}, number = {9}, issn = {0278-0062}, doi = {10.1109/TMI.2021.3077047}, pages = {2329 -- 2342}, abstract = {The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of the MICCAI 2020 AutoImplant Challenge. The approaches and publications submitted and accepted within the challenge will be summarized and reported, highlighting common algorithmic trends and algorithmic diversity. Furthermore, the evaluation results will be presented, compared and discussed in regard to the challenge aim: seeking for low cost, fast and fully automated solutions for cranial implant design. Based on feedback from collaborating neurosurgeons, this paper concludes by stating open issues and post-challenge requirements for intra-operative use.}, language = {en} }