@article{AnztBachDruskatetal.2020, author = {Anzt, H. and Bach, F. and Druskat, S. and L{\"o}ffler, F. and Loewe, A. and Renard, B. Y. and Seemann, G. and Struck, A. and Achhammer, E. and Appell, F. and Bader, M. and Brusch, L. and Busse, C. and Chourdakis, G. and Dabrowski, P. W. and Ebert, P. and Flemisch, B. and Friedl, S. and Fritzsch, B. and Funk, M. D. and Gast, V. and Goth, F. and Grad, J.-N. and Hermann, Sibylle and Hohmann, F. and Janosch, S. and Kutra, D. and Linxweiler, J. and Muth, T. and Peters-Kottig, Wolfgang and Rack, F. and Raters, F. H. C. and Rave, S. and Reina, G. and Reißig, M. and Ropinski, T. and Schaarschmidt, J. and Seibold, H. and Thiele, J. P. and Uekermann, B. and Unger, S. and Weeber, R.}, title = {An environment for sustainable research software in Germany and beyond: current state, open challenges, and call for action [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]}, journal = {F1000Research}, number = {9:295}, doi = {10.12688/f1000research.23224.1}, pages = {28}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Research software has become a central asset in academic research. It optimizes existing and enables new research methods, implements and embeds research knowledge, and constitutes an essential research product in itself. Research software must be sustainable in order to understand, replicate, reproduce, and build upon existing research or conduct new research effectively. In other words, software must be available, discoverable, usable, and adaptable to new needs, both now and in the future. Research software therefore requires an environment that supports sustainability. Hence, a change is needed in the way research software development and maintenance are currently motivated, incentivized, funded, structurally and infrastructurally supported, and legally treated. Failing to do so will threaten the quality and validity of research. In this paper, we identify challenges for research software sustainability in Germany and beyond, in terms of motivation, selection, research software engineering personnel, funding, infrastructure, and legal aspects. Besides researchers, we specifically address political and academic decision-makers to increase awareness of the importance and needs of sustainable research software practices. In particular, we recommend strategies and measures to create an environment for sustainable research software, with the ultimate goal to ensure that software-driven research is valid, reproducible and sustainable, and that software is recognized as a first class citizen in research. This paper is the outcome of two workshops run in Germany in 2019, at deRSE19 - the first International Conference of Research Software Engineers in Germany - and a dedicated DFG-supported follow-up workshop in Berlin.}, language = {en} } @article{XieGruberCrampenetal.2025, author = {Xie, Kunpeng and Gruber, Lennart Johannes and Crampen, Martin and Li, Yao and Ferreira, Andr{\´e} and Tappeiner, Elias and Gillot, Maxime and Schepers, Jan and Xu, Jiangchang and Pankert, Tobias and Beyer, Michel and Shahamiri, Negar and ten Brink, Reinier and Dot, Gauthier and Weschke, Charlotte and van Nistelrooij, Niels and Verhelst, Pieter-Jan and Guo, Yan and Xu, Zhibin and Bienzeisler, Jonas and Rashad, Ashkan and Fl{\"u}gge, Tabea and Cotton, Ross and Vinayahalingam, Shankeeth and Ilesan, Robert and Raith, Stefan and Madsen, Dennis and Seibold, Constantin and Xi, Tong and Berg{\´e}, Stefaan and Nebelung, Sven and Kodym, Oldřich and Sundqvist, Osku and Thieringer, Florian and Lamecker, Hans and Coppens, Antoine and Potrusil, Thomas and Kraeima, Joep and Witjes, Max and Wu, Guomin and Chen, Xiaojun and Lambrechts, Adriaan and Cevidanes, Lucia H Soares and Zachow, Stefan and Hermans, Alexander and Truhn, Daniel and Alves, Victor and Egger, Jan and R{\"o}hrig, Rainer and H{\"o}lzle, Frank and Puladi, Behrus}, title = {Beyond Benchmarks: Towards Robust Artificial Intelligence Bone Segmentation in Socio-Technical Systems}, volume = {299}, journal = {Expert Systems With Applications}, number = {Part D}, doi = {10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130031}, year = {2025}, abstract = {Despite the advances in automated medical image segmentation, AI models still underperform in various clinical settings, challenging real-world integration. In this multicenter evaluation, we analyzed 20 state-of-the-art mandibular segmentation models across 19,218 segmentations of 1,000 clinically resampled CT/CBCT scans. We show that segmentation accuracy varies by up to 25\% depending on socio-technical factors such as voxel size, bone orientation, and patient conditions such as osteosynthesis or pathology. Higher sharpness, isotropic smaller voxels, and neutral orientation significantly improved results, while metallic osteosynthesis and anatomical complexity led to significant degradation. Our findings challenge the common view of AI models as "plug-and-play" tools and suggest evidence-based optimization recommendations for both clinicians and developers. This will in turn boost the integration of AI segmentation tools in routine healthcare.}, language = {en} }